Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/544,273

MODULAR OPEN-AIR SKID WITH ELECTRICAL VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE FOR NATURAL GAS COMPRESSION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 18, 2023
Priority
Dec 16, 2022 — provisional 63/387,809
Examiner
BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Teco-Westinghouse Motor Company
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
608 granted / 977 resolved
-7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1019
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
86.6%
+46.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 977 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4, and 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oehring et al (US PGPub No. 2020/0109616) in view of Vicknair et al (US PGPub. No. 2015/0354322) in further view of Oehring et al (US Patent No. 12,221,872). Oehring teaches: limitations from claim 1, a system (400), comprising: an open-air skid (FIG. 4), further comprising: an electric drive (paragraph 74, “VFD’s” 418); wherein the electric drive (418) provides electrical power to one or more natural gas compressors (pump 404; paragraph 72, the system provides power to a pump and therefore is capable of providing power to a compressor; paragraph 83 further teaches that the system can include various types and numbers of pumps); wherein the open-air skid further comprises a plurality of motor control cabinets (MCC 423) and an input cabinet that provides utility power from a high voltage power line to the electric drive and sync reactor (see cabinet about transformer 424; FIG. 3-4); Oehring ‘616 teaches that multiple pumps can be used (paragraph 83) and the use of control cabinets (MCC 426), but does not each multiple dedicated motor control cabinets or specifically four pumps; However, Oehring ‘872 teaches: limitations from claims 1 and 4, a mobile power supply (FIG. 3) in which individual pumps (10) are respectively provided with VFD and controls (see C. 3 Line 62 through C. 4 Line 4); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of power supply systems to provide multiple control cabinets in the system of Oehring ‘616, such that each pump has a dedicated control and drive as taught by Oehring ‘872, in order to independent control and redundancy in case of failure (C. 4 Lines 5-15 of Oehring ‘872); Further, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to utilize multiple pumps (see paragraph 83 of Oehring ‘616 and C. 7 Lines 46-48 of Oehring ‘872 teaching two or more pumps per trailer), such as four pumps, in order to control the output of the pumping assembly; it has been held that the mere duplication of parts alone is not patentably significant: MPEP 2144.04 Section VI.B). Oehring teaches relying on a power grid amongst other power sources to provide power to the system (paragraphs 51, 83), but does not teach a sync reactor; Vicknair teaches a mobile substation providing conditioned power from a grid, wherein synchronizers (48) are utilized to synchronize the power provided from multiple sources including a power grid to supply power to a user (paragraph 15); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of power supply systems at the time the invention was filed to provide a sync reactor (synchronizer) in the system of Oehring ‘616, as taught by Vicknair, in order to synchronized the frequency of multiple sources and users. Oehring ‘616 further teaches: limitations from claim 8, wherein the skid further comprises: a height in between, and including, 11 feet to 13 feet, a length in between and including 40 feet to 43 feet, and a width in between and including 10 feet to 15 feet (Oehring does not teach particular dimensions for the skid; However, at paragraph 88, Oehring teaches that sizing a trailer effectively can reduce the permitting required; It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of power supply systems to choose skid dimensions both to fit all required components of the system as well as to remain within permitted restrictions); limitations from claim 9, wherein the skid does not comprise side walls (see FIG. 4-5); limitations from claim 10, wherein the open-air skid further comprises, a step-down transformer (424), and a remote cooling unit (428); wherein the remote cooling unit cools the electric drive (paragraph 84); Claim(s) 5 and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oehring et al (US PGPub No. 2020/0109616) in view of Vicknair et al (US PGPub. No. 2015/0354322) in view of Oehring et al (US Patent No. 12,221,872) as applied to claims 1 and 4 above, and in further view of Gable et al (US Patent No. 11,852,133). Oehring ‘616 teaches a “black start generator”, but does not teach a particular start-up of multiple pumps; Gable teaches: limitations from claim 5, a power system (FIG. 1-2) including multiple pumps (224) driven by motors (212) powered by VFD’s (216); and wherein the electric drive and the sync reactor provide electrical power to the one or more natural gas compressors comprises: providing start-up power to a first natural gas compressor of the one or more natural gas compressors via the electric drive and the sync reactor (see Vicknair teaching synchronizers; see FIG. 8 steps 304-312; C. 9 Lines 48-57); transferring the first natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet; and providing start-up power to a second natural gas compressor of the one or more natural gas compressors via the electric drive and the sync reactor (see FIG. 8 steps 316-332; C. 9 Lines 57-63 and C. 11 Lines 22-64); and providing start-up power to a third natural gas compressor of the second set of one or more natural gas compressors via the electric drive and sync reactor; transferring the third natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet, providing start-up power to a fourth natural gas compressor of the second set of one or more natural gas compressors via the electric drive and the sync reactor, and transferring the fourth natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet (Oehring ‘616 teaches that multiple pumps can be used, paragraph 83; see FIG. 8; C. 11 Lines 22-64 of Gable); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of power supply systems at the time the invention was filed to start each pump at a time utilizing a “soft-start” to ramp up the power system of Oehring ‘616, as taught by Gable, in order to safely and efficiently start the system/pumps from cold. Oehring ‘616 further teaches: limitations from claim 7, wherein each of the four natural gas compressors exerts up to 2500 horsepower (paragraph 66); Claim(s) 11-12 and 14-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oehring et al (US PGPub No. 2020/0109616) in view of Vicknair et al (US PGPub. No. 2015/0354322) in view of Gable et al (US Patent No. 11,852,133). Oehring teaches: limitations from claim 11, a system (400), comprising: an open-air skid (FIG. 4), further comprising: an electric drive (paragraph 74, “VFD’s” 418); wherein the electric drive (418) provides electrical power to four natural gas compressors (pump 404; paragraph 72, the system provides power to a pump and therefore is capable of providing power to a compressor; paragraph 83 further teaches that the system can include various types and quantities of pumps); an input cabinet that provides utility power from a high voltage power line to the electric drive and sync reactor (see cabinet about transformer 424; FIG. 3-4), a control cabinet (MCC 426; paragraph 78 teaching a control enclosure for the MCC); Oehring teaches relying on a grid amongst other power sources to provide power to the system (paragraphs 51, 83), but does not teach a sync reactor; Vicknair teaches a mobile substation providing conditioned power from a grid, wherein synchronizers (48) are utilized to synchronize the power provided from multiple sources including the grid to supply power to a user (paragraph 15); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of power supply systems at the time the invention was filed to provide a sync reactor (synchronizer) in the system of Oehring, as taught by Vicknair, in order to synchronized the frequency of multiple sources and users. Oehring ‘616 teaches a “black start generator” and the use of multiple pumps (paragraph 83), but does not teach a particular start-up of multiple pumps; Gable teaches: limitations from claim 11, a power system (FIG. 1-2) including multiple pumps (224) driven by motors (212) powered by VFD’s (216); and wherein the electric drive and the sync reactor provide electrical power to the multiple pumps, comprises: providing start-up power to a first pump of the pumps via the electric drive and the sync reactor (see Vicknair teaching synchronizers; see FIG. 8 steps 304-312; C. 9 Lines 48-57); transferring the first natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet; and providing start-up power to a second pump via the electric drive and the sync reactor (see FIG. 8 steps 316-332; C. 9 Lines 57-63 and C. 11 Lines 22-64); further comprising: providing start-up power to a third pump via the electric drive and the sync reactor; transferring the third natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet; providing start-up power to a fourth pump via the electric drive and the sync reactor; and transferring the fourth natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet (Oehring ‘616 teaches that multiple pumps can be used, paragraph 83; see FIG. 8; C. 11 Lines 22-64 of Gable); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of power supply systems at the time the invention was filed to utilize a “soft-start” to ramp up the power system of Oehring ‘616, as taught by Gable, in order to safely and efficiently start the system/pumps from cold. Further, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to utilize multiple pumps (see paragraph 83 of Oehring ‘616 and C. 7 Lines 46-48 of Oehring ‘872 teaching two or more pumps per trailer), such as four pumps, in order to control the output of the pumping assembly. Further, it has been held that the mere duplication of parts alone is not patentably significant: MPEP 2144.04 Section VI.B). Gable further teaches: limitations from claim 12, wherein transferring the first natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet comprises: syncing, by the sync reactor (via the combination with Vicknair), a power and frequency of the first natural gas compressor with a power and frequency of the utility power, removing the start-up power provided by the electric drive and sync reactor, and connecting the utility power with the synced first natural gas compressor (Oehring ‘616 teaches that multiple pumps can be used, paragraph 83; see FIG. 8; C. 11 Lines 22-64 of Gable); limitations from claim 16, further comprising: transporting the open-air skid to a second site (Oehring teaches a mobile skid, FIG. 4 for example; Gable teaches a mobile unit, FIG. 2A; therefore the skids are capable of movement to different site locations) having a second set of one or more natural gas compressors; providing start-up power to a first pump of the pumps via the electric drive and the sync reactor (see Vicknair teaching synchronizers; see FIG. 8 steps 304-312; C. 9 Lines 48-57); transferring the first natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet; and providing start-up power to a second pump via the electric drive and the sync reactor (see FIG. 8 steps 316-332; C. 9 Lines 57-63 and C. 11 Lines 22-64), and providing start-up power to a third natural gas compressor of the second set of one or more natural gas compressors via the electric drive and sync reactor; transferring the third natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet, providing start-up power to a fourth natural gas compressor of the second set of one or more natural gas compressors via the electric drive and the sync reactor, and transferring the fourth natural gas compressor from start-up power to utility power provided by the input cabinet (Oehring ‘616 teaches that multiple pumps can be used, paragraph 83; see FIG. 8; C. 11 Lines 22-64 of Gable); Oehring further teaches: limitations from claim 14, wherein the skid further comprises: a height in between, and including, 11 feet to 13 feet, a length in between and including 40 feet to 43 feet, and a width in between and including 10 feet to 15 feet (Oehring does not teach particular dimensions for the skid; However, at paragraph 88, Oehring teaches that sizing a trailer effectively can reduce the permitting required; It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of power supply systems to choose skid dimensions both to fit all required components of the system as well as to remain within permitted restrictions); limitations from claim 15, wherein the skid does not comprise side walls (see FIG. 4-5); Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/10/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant has amended the claims to include limitations that four compressors and associated cabinets are provided in the system. Applicant argues that Oehring ‘616 does not teach how multiple pumps are powered, and as such does not teach multiple pumps connected to a single power source (page 10 of the response). The examiner maintains that Oehring ‘616, and in particular the combination of Oehring ‘616 with Oehring ‘872 teaches the limitations requiring power to be provided to multiple pump drives. Oehring ‘616 teaches providing grid power to the pumps (paragraphs 51 and 83 disclose single-source power as an alternative to plural sources; see also FIG. 3 in which 1 power source can power multiple pieces of equipment); Oehring ‘872 teaches the use of two or more pumps (C. 7 Lines 46-48; and also FIG. 5 teaching multiple pumps 210A powered by a single generator through dedicated cabinets 223A) driven by a VFD/power source discrete to each pump (C. 6 Lines 40-43). Therefore, the combination of the Oehring references leads to a system having a single power source for multiple pumps. Gable additionally teaches providing selective power to multiple pumps through a VFD (see above rejection, and abstract of Gable). The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 2023/0272700 teaches providing grid power (paragraph 36) to a multitude of pumps (paragraph 23, 27, 55) and a single source power (paragraph 58); US 2022/0162933 teaches multiple pumps (56) on a single trailer; Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S BOBISH whose telephone number is (571)270-5289. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Essama Omgba can be reached at 469-295-9278. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S BOBISH/Examiner, Art Unit 3746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680556
DIVERSIFIED AND REMOVABLE PUMP SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INFLATING AND DEFLATING INFLATABLE OBJECTS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680542
OPERATING MULTIPLE FRACTURING PUMPS TO DELIVER A SMOOTH TOTAL FLOW RATE TRANSITION
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674443
MULTI-PIPING SPIRAL-PUMP FOR TREATING FOOD ITEMS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671295
ELECTRIC SCROLL COMPRESSOR WITH MOTOR CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY AND MOTOR CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY FOR ELECTRIC SCROLL COMPRESSOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663010
CENTRIFUGAL-TYPE ELECTRIC REFRIGERANT COMPRESSOR HAVING INTEGRAL ORIFICE-REGULATED BEARING COOLING ARRANGEMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+29.2%)
3y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 977 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month