Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/544,538

VEHICLE SEAT WITH ELECTRONIC DEVICE CHARGER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 19, 2023
Examiner
BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
FCA US LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
958 granted / 1180 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1231
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1180 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION In Response to Applicant’s Remarks Filed 10/30/25 The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1, 5-11 and 15-20 are pending. Claims 1, 5-11 and 15-20 have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 5-7 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (CN 109383338) (“Wang”) in view of Line. Wang teaches a vehicle seat configured to be disposed within a vehicle, the vehicle seat comprising: a seat bottom (fig. 1: shown); a seat back (fig. 1: 1); a seat ventilation unit (fig. 1: 15) disposed within the seat bottom; a storage compartment system, comprising: a storage compartment (fig. 2: 14) disposed within the seat bottom and configured to receive an electronic device; and wherein the seat ventilation unit includes one or more fans to generate a cooling airflow to the vehicle seat to cool a passenger seated therein. Wang does not teach wherein the storage compartment includes a wireless charging device and the seat ventilation unit provides cooling airflow to the storage compartment. However, Line teaches a storage compartment including a wireless charging device (paragraph 0024) and a cooling module (fig. 6: 121) configured to provide cooling to the storage compartment to cool the electronic device. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to provide a wireless charger in order to allow charging of devices while they are stored and to provide cooling by way of the existing ventilation unit in order to maintain a desired temperature in the storage compartment, as taught by Line. As concerns claim 5, Wang, as modified, teaches a first duct configured to supply a first cooling airflow to the vehicle seat (shown in fig. 2 extending from 15 toward 17); and a second duct fluidly coupled to the storage compartment and configured to supply a second cooling airflow to the storage compartment (as discussed above and taught by the combination with Line). As concerns claim 6, Wang, as modified, teaches wherein the wireless charger is an inductive charger (Line, paragraph 0024). As concerns claim 7, Wang, as modified, teaches wherein the storage compartment includes a door (Wang, 10) configured to move between an open position that enables the electronic device to be inserted into or removed from the storage compartment, and a closed position that encloses the storage compartment. As concerns claim 9, Wang, as modified, teaches wherein the storage compartment comprises: a base, wherein the wireless charger is integrated into the base; a top wall; opposed side walls; a rear wall; and a door (fig. 2: shows the storage compartment 14 having a top wall, rear wall, side walls and a door 10 with the base including the wireless charger so that the device may be placed upon it for charging). As concerns claim 10, Wang, as modified, teaches a headrest having one or more speakers (fig. 1: 5). Claim(s) 11, 15-17, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang in view of Line and further in view of Grupo (FR 2977202). Wang teaches a vehicle seat configured to be disposed within a vehicle, the vehicle seat comprising: a seat bottom (fig. 1: shown); a seat back (fig. 1: 1); a seat ventilation unit (fig. 1: 15) disposed within the seat bottom; a storage compartment system, comprising: a storage compartment (fig. 2: 14) disposed within the seat bottom and configured to receive an electronic device; and wherein the seat ventilation unit includes one or more fans to generate a cooling airflow to the vehicle seat to cool a passenger seated therein. Wang does not teach wherein the storage compartment includes a wireless charging device and the seat ventilation unit provides cooling airflow to the storage compartment or a track system. However, Line teaches a storage compartment including a wireless charging device (paragraph 0024) and a cooling module (fig. 6: 121) configured to provide cooling to the storage compartment to cool the electronic device. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to provide a wireless charger in order to allow charging of devices while they are stored and to provide cooling by way of the existing ventilation unit in order to maintain a desired temperature in the storage compartment, as taught by Line. Further, Grupo teaches a rotatable attachment for the seat base to be rotated on a track system (fig. 1: 8). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to provide a rotatable attachment for the seat base in order to allow the user to rotate to a desired position. As concerns claim 15, Wang, as modified, teaches a first duct configured to supply a first cooling airflow to the vehicle seat (shown in fig. 2 extending from 15 toward 17); and a second duct fluidly coupled to the storage compartment and configured to supply a second cooling airflow to the storage compartment (as discussed above and taught by the combination with Line). As concerns claim 16, Wang, as modified, teaches wherein the wireless charger is an inductive charger (Line, paragraph 0024). As concerns claim 17, Wang, as modified, teaches wherein the storage compartment includes a door (Wang, 10) configured to move between an open position that enables the electronic device to be inserted into or removed from the storage compartment, and a closed position that encloses the storage compartment. As concerns claim 19, Wang, as modified, teaches wherein the storage compartment comprises: a base, wherein the wireless charger is integrated into the base; a top wall; opposed side walls; a rear wall; and a door (fig. 2: shows the storage compartment 14 having a top wall, rear wall, side walls and a door 10 with the base including the wireless charger so that the device may be placed upon it for charging). As concerns claim 20, Wang, as modified, teaches a headrest having one or more speakers (fig. 1: 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art references of Line, Wang and Grupo fail to teach wherein the storage compartment is accessible from an inboard side of the seat bottom as there is no teaching, suggestion or motivation to modify the seat bottom of Wang to allow for inboard access to the storage compartment without substantial redesign of the system. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/30/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive with respect to Wang, and moot with respect to Line as a primary reference as it is not used in the manner in the present Office Action, as necessitated by amendment. With respect to Wang, Applicant argues that Wang in combination with Line does not teach claim 11, as Wang does not teach cooling of the storage compartment and Line merely describes a refrigerating unit to cool the storage compartment within the seat. The Office disagrees. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to use the teaching of Line providing a cooled storage compartment in combination with Wang to provide an additional duct from the ventilation system to cool the storage compartment therein. This is simply a duplication of parts (ducts) to provide the result of Line. Further, Examiner does not concede that the refrigeration unit of Line would not include a fan therein to circulate the cooled air. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY J BRINDLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7231. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 5712726670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY J BRINDLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 30, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600478
RECLINING SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600277
BACKREST FOR A VEHICLE SEAT AND A METHOD FOR MOUNTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595060
SEAT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588766
SEAT COMPRISING A FRAME AND A COVER, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583366
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month