Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/544,581

PRINTING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PRINTING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 19, 2023
Examiner
HUFFMAN, JULIAN D
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
538 granted / 675 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
687
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 675 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse is acknowledged. Claims 2-4 and 13-17 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 9/8/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the minimum number" in 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 5, change “equal to” to “is equal to”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 6, 18 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tsubotani (EP 3318405 A1). Tsubotani discloses, with regards to claim: A printing apparatus comprising: a selection unit (figure 1, element 20, [0052] ) configured to select a predetermined number of nozzles (Figure 5, Element 123) from nozzles of a printhead including a plurality of nozzles configured to discharge a liquid droplet; and a detection unit (15, fig. 4, [0042] ) configured to detect a discharge state of a liquid droplet by using the predetermined number of nozzles being selected, wherein the selection unit selects the predetermined number of nozzles such that a nozzle having a discharge abnormality is not included in the predetermined number of nozzles ( [0064], [0088] ). 5. The printing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the selection unit selects the predetermined number of nozzles from nozzle groups having a same drive timing in the nozzles of the printhead (the term “drive timing” is not defined, the nozzles are detected within the same timing window). 6. The printing apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the selection unit selects the predetermined number of nozzles from a nozzle group including the minimum number of nozzles having a discharge abnormality among the nozzle groups (the head unit detected has some minimum number of nozzles having a discharge abnormality). Claims 18 and 19 are rejected for similar rationale as claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Julian D Huffman whose telephone number is (571)272-2147. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Group Director Andrea Wellington can be reached at (571)272-4483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JULIAN D. HUFFMAN Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 2859 /JULIAN D HUFFMAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594852
BIDIRECTIONAL ENERGY TRANSFER SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING A CORDSET
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583220
Liquid Discharge Apparatus And Liquid Discharge Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12545024
LIQUID DISCHARGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12500172
3D SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING INTER-FINGER STRUCTURE AND INTERLAYER INSULATING LAYERS CONFIGURED TO ABSORB COMPRESSING STRESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12467793
ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER AND THERMOPILE ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+0.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 675 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month