Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/545,349

ELECTRONIC DEVICE, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR IDENTIFYING VISUAL OBJECT CORRESPONDING TO CODE INFORMATION USING A PLURALITY OF CAMERAS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 19, 2023
Priority
Nov 21, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0156652 +2 more
Examiner
ABDOU TCHOUSSOU, BOUBACAR
Art Unit
2482
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
311 granted / 453 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
481
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 453 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ota (US 20210042485) in view of Ono (US 20030020814). As to claim 16, Ota discloses an electronic device (FIGS. 1-2), comprising: a plurality of cameras including a first camera and a second camera facing in a same direction as the first camera (FIG. 1B, cameras 114a, 114b, 114c); a display (FIG. 1A, display 105); at least one processor (FIG. 2, CPU 101); and memory for storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to (see [0018]): display, on the display, a preview image, based on first image frames obtained using the first camera from among the plurality of cameras (FIG. 4A, S401; see [0041], In S402, the CPU 101 displays, on the display 105, an LV image captured by the standard camera 114b among the three rear cameras 114 driven in S401), based at least in part on the distance (see [0036], [0047], [0048]): while maintaining displaying the preview image based on first image frames obtained using the first camera from among the plurality of cameras, obtain second image frames using the second camera (FIG. 4A, S404-S405; see [0043]-[0044], the CPU 101 determines whether the two-dimensional code is readable by the standard camera image processing unit 104b from the image captured by the standard camera 114b … If the two-dimensional code is unreadable (NO in S404), the processing proceeds to S405 … using the telecamera image processing unit 104a, the CPU 101 determines whether a subject appearing to be a two-dimensional code is included in an image captured by the telecamera 114), execute a recognition of quick response (QR) code based on the second image frames while displaying the preview image on the display (FIG. 4A, S406; see [0045], the CPU 101 determines whether the two-dimensional code is readable by the telecamera image processing unit 104a from the image captured by the telecamera 114a, e.g., determines whether a distribution pattern of the cells 602 of a subject appearing to be a two-dimensional code is detectable; see FIG. 6 and [0042], symbol 601 is a QR code). Ota fails to explicitly disclose a sensor facing in a same direction as the first camera and the second camera; obtain, by using the sensor, information regarding a distance from an external object viewed in the preview image being displayed on the display; select, by using reference data regarding a relation between candidate distances and magnifications available through the plurality of cameras, a first magnification related to a candidate distance corresponding to the distance, and change a camera for a recognition function from the first camera to the second camera supporting the first magnification. However, Ono teaches a sensor facing in a same direction as the first camera and the second camera (FIG. 2, distance sensor 52); obtain, by using the sensor, information regarding a distance from an external object viewed in the preview image being displayed on the display (see [0033]); select, by using reference data regarding a relation between candidate distances and magnifications available through the plurality of cameras, a first magnification related to a candidate distance corresponding to the distance, and change a camera for a recognition function from the first camera to the second camera supporting the first magnification (see [0085]-[0086]). At the time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art to modify Ota using Ono’s teachings to include a sensor facing in a same direction as the first camera and the second camera; obtain, by using the sensor, information regarding a distance from an external object viewed in the preview image being displayed on the display; select, by using reference data regarding a relation between candidate distances and magnifications available through the plurality of cameras, a first magnification related to a candidate distance corresponding to the distance, change a camera for a recognition function from the first camera to the second camera supporting the first magnification in order to enlarge the magnification range substantially continuously by automatically switching one of the capture signals by the two zoom lenses to the other based on the measured distance data and using it, and thereby increase the available applications in which the image capturing can be increased and also increase the amount of information that can be captured (Ono; [0085]). As to claim 17, the combination of Ota and Ono further discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: based on a candidate distance corresponding to the distance, identify two or more magnifications for accurately identifying a bar code and/or quick-response (QR) code (Ota: [0025] and FIGS. 3A-3D; and Ono: see [0085]-[0086]). As to claim 18, the combination of Ota and Ono further discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: based at least in part on determining, based on the distance, the camera for the recognition of the QR code being maintained as the first camera (Ota: FIG. 4A, YES at S403-S404; Ono: see [0085]): obtain third image frames by magnifying the first image frames obtained using the first camera, while displaying the preview image (Ota: see [0042]; Ono: see [0085]), and execute the recognition of the QR code based on at least portion of the third image frames (Ota: FIG. 4A, S404 and S413; Ono: see [0085]). As to claim 19, the combination of Ota and Ono further discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: in response to success of the recognition of the QR code, display a visual object while the preview image is maintained on the display (Ono; FIGS. 3A-3B). As to claim 20, the combination of Ota and Ono further discloses wherein the visual object is displayed along a periphery of a recognized QR code position on the external object viewed in the preview image (Ota; FIG. 3D and [0052]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s amendments and arguments, filed on 07/06/2026, with respect to the rejection of claims 1 and 10 under 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims has been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments, with respect to claim 16, have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the applied references do not disclose or suggest, among other things, selecting a magnification using reference data regarding a relation between candidate distances and magnifications available through a plurality of cameras. The examiner respectfully disagrees. Ono discloses, in [0085]-[0086], the capturing system CPU 50 causes the first capturing optical system 21a to be selected when the distance to the subject is shorter than a predetermined distance and the second capturing optical system 21b to be selected when the distance to the subject is longer than the predetermined distance, based on the measured distance data from the distance sensor 52. Thus, by automatically switching one of the capture signals by the two zoom lenses 220a and 220b to the other based on the measured distance data and using it, the magnification range can be enlarged substantially continuously … the telephoto zoom lens is used when a distant view is to be captured while the wide-angle zoom lens is used when a near view is to be captured. Therefore, the combination of Ota and Ono discloses selecting a magnification using reference data regarding a relation between candidate distances and magnifications available through a plurality of cameras. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BOUBACAR ABDOU TCHOUSSOU whose telephone number is (571)272-7625. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Kelley can be reached at 5712727331. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BOUBACAR ABDOU TCHOUSSOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2482
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 28, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 28, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739422
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WARP SAMPLE SELECTION AND GROUPING
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739417
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DECODING VIDEO DATA
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739523
IMAGING DEVICE AND MOBILE APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725040
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND LEARNING METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726626
TRANSFORMATION-BASED IMAGE CODING METHOD AND DEVICE THEREFOR
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 453 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month