Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/546,314

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIDELINK RESOURCE RESERVATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 14, 2023
Examiner
JAIN, RAJ K
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
717 granted / 818 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
861
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 818 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 28-30,35,51,54,63-64 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LUO et al (US 20210314935 A1) hereinafter as LUO in view of SHIN et al (US 20220329301 A1) hereinafter as SHIN. Regarding claim(s) 28,51,54,63, LUO discloses a wireless communication method for dynamically adapting resource reservation of a sidelink channel using semi persistent scheduling (See Fig(s). 1), the method comprising the following steps: receiving, at a first item of user equipment, a first and a second item of data for transmission via a semi persistent scheduling mode, and a status indication of a shared wireless resource pool of the first item of user equipment and one or more second items of user equipment (See Fig(s). 1, See ¶ 197, In the SPS mode, the terminal device sends a traffic type (traffic pattern) to the local coordinator, and the local coordinator configures an SPS parameter for the terminal…. the local coordinator broadcasts one or more resource pools on one or more carriers, by using a control plane message…. See ¶ 42 BFR includes the status of resources request messaging.); notifying, by the first item of user equipment, an initial semi persistent scheduling reservation for the first item of data to the one or more second items of user equipment via the shared resource pool (See Fig(s). 6, step 601, See ¶ 197, The scheduling mode may be classified into a dynamic resource allocation mode and a semi-persistent (SPS) mode. In the dynamic resource allocation mode, the terminal device requests, from the local coordinator, a sidelink to send a resource (for example, send a buffer status report (BSR)), and the local coordinator allocates a specified resource pool to the terminal based on the request. In the SPS mode, the terminal device sends a traffic type (traffic pattern) to the local coordinator, and the local coordinator configures an SPS parameter for the terminal.); notifying, by the first item of user equipment, the one or more second items of user equipment of at least one reservation of a wireless resource defined in the shared wireless resource pool according to (See ¶ 16,47, the first node properly allocates a resource to a managed terminal device, or the first node properly allocates a resource to the first terminal device that communicates with the first node, and sends the second resource information to the first terminal device, so that resource utilization is improved.). LUO fails to disclose a declaration included in the initial or a further semi persistent scheduling reservation of the sidelink channel, wherein the declaration signals the establishment or alteration or cancellation of at least one semi persistent scheduling reservation in respect of the first and/or second item of data. SHIN discloses a declaration included in the initial or a further semi persistent scheduling reservation of the sidelink channel, wherein the declaration signals the establishment or alteration or cancellation of at least one semi persistent scheduling reservation in respect of the first and/or second item of data (See ¶ 551,554-557, the UE performs an RLM/RLF operation to declare RLF,…The UE corresponding to the transmitting end may perform ..methods for sidelink recovery and re-establishment ….which is interpreted same as alteration.). If a primary link fails, the UE can switch to a secondary link without significant service interruption via link re-establishment thus enhancing SPS use of resource allocations. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate the teachings of SHIN within LUO, for continuity of sidelink communications without disruption or failure. Further with regards to claims 54 and 63, Luo discloses a processor and memory for performing the method of claim 28, (See Fig(s). 12). Regarding claim(s) 29,64, SHIN discloses transmitting, by the first item of user equipment, the second item of data for transmission to the one or more second items of user equipment via the sidelink channel in a transmission opportunity of the shared wireless resource pool defined by the declaration included in the initial or the further semi persistent scheduling reservation (See ¶ See ¶ 551,554-555, The UE corresponding to the transmitting end may perform one or more of the following methods for sidelink recovery and re-establishment.). Reasons for combining same as claim 28. Regarding claim(s) 30, SHIN discloses releasing or vacating, by the first item of user equipment, at least one of the initial or the further semi persistent scheduling reservations in the wireless resource of the shared wireless resource pool according to the declaration (See ¶ 551-553). Reasons for combining same as claim 28. Regarding claim(s) 35, Luo discloses wherein the further semi persistent scheduling reservation uses the same set of frequency resources as those used by the semi persistent scheduling reservation, wherein the set of frequency resources include at least one frequency resource having a first frequency index (See ¶ 214, the first indication information sent by the first node further includes a CBR measurement result. The CBR measurement result includes a list, where each information element in the list is an identifier (pool index) of a resource pool and a corresponding CBR measurement result.). Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 31-34,36-43,55-62 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's election with traverse of Group 1 claims (28-43,51,54-64) in the reply filed on 2/9/26 is acknowledged. Based on the newly added claims reciting features simile to independent claim 28, all claims stated above are examined on the merits without prejudice. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Raj Jain whose telephone number is (571) 272-3145. The examiner can normally be reached on M-Th ~8 ~6. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached on 571-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /RAJ JAIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 14, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12568472
CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REPORTING BASED ON SUB-RESOURCE POOLS FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568514
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568512
Method and Apparatus for Determining Sidelink Transmission Resource
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563561
SIGNALING ASPECTS OF APERIODIC CSI REPORTING TRIGGERED BY A DOWNLINK GRANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563578
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RESERVING RESOURCES IN NR V2X
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 818 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month