Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/546,699

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONFIGURING BANDWIDTH FIELD AND INDICATOR BIT TO INDICATE BANDWIDTH OF TB A-PPDU IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 16, 2023
Priority
Mar 10, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0031546 +3 more
Examiner
WHITAKER, JUSTIN MICHAEL
Art Unit
2415
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
13 granted / 19 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
64
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
75.6%
+35.6% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 19 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/28/2026. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment filed on 07/10/2026 has been entered. Independent Claims 1, 10, and 11 have been amended. Dependent claims 2-9 and 12-17 have been amended. No claims have been cancelled. No claims are new and have been entered. Claims 1-15 are still pending in this application. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments/amendments with respect to Claim Objections have been considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the Objections are withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 01/28/2026 on pages 9 to 11, with respect to the rejection of Claims 1-17 under 35 USC § 112(b), have been fully considered and are persuasive. However, considering the amended claims, a new rejection of Claims 1-15 under 35 USC § 112(b) has been seen. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. The claims are not clearly written to define metes and bounds of the claimed invention. Regarding Claim 1, Claim 10, and Claim 11 The claims recite “receiving, by a non-access point station (non-AP STA), a trigger frame from an AP;”. The claims are not clear as to the method and specific MHz band that the non-AP STA receives the trigger frame. The claims further recite “Trigger Based Aggregated-Physical Protocol Data Unit (TB A-PPDU) triggered by the trigger frame through a 320 MHz band”. The claims are not clear as to what the trigger frame is in relation to the receiving step. The claims further recite “wherein the second bit indicates whether the first 80 MHz channel is a lower 80 MHz channel or an upper 80 MHz channel within the secondary 160 MHz channel”. The claims are not clear as to the relationship between the first 80 MHz channel, and the primary 80 MHz channel, if they are functionally the same or functionally different channels in relation to the bits. The claims further recite, more broadly, that the non-AP STA receives a trigger frame, and then processes the information. The claims are not clear as to the methodology of the non-AP STA, if the response is preconfigured with a broad update, a specific unmentioned configuration step, or a unique case from the specified AP. Claims 2-9 and 12-15 are rejected based upon claim dependency to Claim 1 or Claim 11. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN MICHAEL WHITAKER whose telephone number is (703)756-4763. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Rutkowski can be reached on (571) 270-1215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN MICHAEL WHITAKER/Examiner, Art Unit 2415 /Sudesh M. Patidar/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2415
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Oct 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 28, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 25, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12712802
EQUAL-COST MULTI-PATH (ECMP) ROUTING WITH RESILIENCY AND CONSISTENT ORDERING
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706686
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING MODULATION AND CODING SCHEME MCS INDICATION INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12563457
CELL RESELECTION
3y 4m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562856
INTER PANEL RECEPTION AT UE
3y 1m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563597
BLOCK ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LATENCY SENSITIVE TRAFFIC STREAM
3y 1m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.8%)
3y 3m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 19 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month