Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/547,056

Method and System for Commissioning an HVAC System

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Aug 18, 2023
Examiner
AHMED, ISTIAQUE
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
VIESSMANN CLIMATE SOLUTIONS SE
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
134 granted / 194 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
216
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 194 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the Amendment filed on 12/30/2025 Claim 1, 10 and 12-17 are amended. Claims 1-17 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Page 9 of remarks, filed 12/30/2025, with respect to rejection of claims 14-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 14-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 has been withdrawn in light of the amendments. Applicant’s arguments, see page 11-12 of remarks, filed 12/30/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-11 and 14-17 in view of Khan (US Pat. No. 10,778,460) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Applicant argues, “Khan does not indicate that the method disclosed therein involves generating a configuration file at a "configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold" for an "HVAC system [that] is to be delivered to an operation site where the HVAC system is to be installed" and that is different than the "configuration site."” Examiner agrees. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of KHAN (US10778460B1) modified in view of Land (US20160116179A1). Applicant’s arguments, see page 12 of remarks, filed 12/30/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 12-13 in view of Khan (US Pat. No. 10,778,460) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Applicant argues, “Khan does not indicate that the disclosed location for the server 430, i.e., the airside system 130 (or 300) in building 10 where the HVAC system is operated or in the "cloud," is where the Khan HVAC system is manufactured or sold.” Examiner agrees. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of KHAN (US10778460B1) modified in view of Land (US20160116179A1). Drawings The drawings were received on 12/30/2025. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 14-16 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 14 recites, A computing device comprising a non-transitory computer readable media with a computer program stored thereon with instructions which, when being executed by the computing device, cause the computing device to carry out the steps of the method of claim 1. Claim 1 recites some steps being performed by a computing device and some steps being performed by a mobile device. It is unclear whether the claim 14 is directed to the computing device performing all of the steps if claim 1 or only the steps recited as being performed by a computing device in claim 1. For the sake of compact prosecution the computing device of claim 14 is being interpreted to only carry out the steps recited as being performed by a computing device in claim 1 Claim 15 recites, A mobile device comprising a non-transitory computer readable media with a computer program stored thereon with instructions which, when being executed by the mobile device, cause the mobile device to carry out the steps of the method of claim 1. Claim 1 recites some steps being performed by a computing device and some steps being performed by a mobile device. It is unclear whether the claim 15 is directed to the mobile device performing all of the steps if claim 1 or only the steps recited as being performed by a mobile device in claim 1. For the sake of compact prosecution the mobile device of claim 15 is being interpreted to only carry out the steps recited as being performed by a mobile device in claim 1 Claim 16 recites, A computing device comprising a non-transitory computer readable media with a computer program stored thereon with instructions which, when being executed by the computing device, cause the computing device to carry out the steps of the method of claim 10. Claim 10 recites some steps being performed by a computing device and some steps being performed by a central storage device. It is unclear whether the claim 16 is directed to the computing device performing all of the steps if claim 10 or only the steps recited as being performed by a computing device in claim 10. For the sake of compact prosecution the computing device of claim 16 is being interpreted to only carry out the steps recited as being performed by a computing device in claim 10. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 17 recites, A mobile device comprising a non-transitory computer readable media with a computer program stored thereon with instructions which, when being executed by the mobile device, cause the mobile device to carry out the steps of the method of claim 10. According to published specification ¶0121-¶0125 the steps of the method of claim 10 is performed by a central storage device and computing device. Specification does not describe the method of claim 10 being performed by a mobile device. Therefore, the claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-6 and 10-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KHAN (US10778460B1) in view of Land (US20160116179A1) Regarding claim 1, Khan teaches, A method for configuring and commissioning an HVAC system, comprising: generating, …a configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system such that the HVAC system is brought into operation, (Column 19 Line 40-55 teaches configuration data generator 852 of server 430 generates configuration data) uploading, by the computing device, the generated configuration file to a central storage unit; (Column 4 Line 40-44 teaches, A server (also referred to as “a central computing device”) generates and stores configuration data specifying one or more parameters of the edge devices for climate control. Column 19 Line 43-45 teaches configuration data generator 852 of server 430 stores the default values of the operating parameters at the memory 850. downloading, by a mobile device, the uploaded configuration file from the central storage unit; (Column 15 Line 7-20 teaches configuration data retriever 652 of controller device retrieves and stores configuration data from the server. Column 11 Line 35-40 teaches, “the controller device 410 is implemented as a smart phone”) transmitting, by the mobile device, the downloaded configuration file to an HVAC control unit comprised in the HVAC system located at the operation site; and (Column 13 Line 1-5 teaches, the controller device may automatically connect to multiple edge devices within the predetermined distance through wireless networks hosted by the edge devices and transmit configuration data through the wireless networks. Column 18 Line 7-15 teaches edge device includes a HVAC controller.) commissioning, by the HVAC control unit, the HVAC system located at the operation site with the transmitted configuration file. (Column 13 Line 5-7 teaches, the controller device 410 may configure multiple edge devices within the predetermined distance through a seamless process. Column 18 Line 7-15 teaches edge device includes a HVAC controller.) Khan doesn’t teach, generating, by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold, a configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system such that the HVAC system is brought into operation, wherein the configuration file is generated at the configuration site and the HVAC system is to be delivered to an operation site where the HVAC system is to be installed and that is different than the configuration site; (Khan in Column 19 Line 40-55 teaches computing device (server 430) generating configuration data. However it doesn’t teach the configuration data is generated by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold. Land in ¶0023 teaches, server system 120 may facilitate the ability of the client system 130 to specify and program the configuration of the controller 104 at a customer's site and the server system 120 may allow the client system 130 to establish (create), edit, and/or manage templates of configuration parameters and/or settings. Also teaches, the server system 120 may allow the client system 130 to remotely push individual and/or bulk parameters or settings to the installed system (e.g., controller 104). ¶0023 also teaches, the client system 130 located at a dealer location (“computer at the dealer location”). ¶0010 teaches HVAC systems located at customer location) Land is an art in the area of interest as it teaches, configuring electronically programmable heating, ventilation, and/or air conditioning (“HVAC”) (see Abstract). A combination of Land with Khan would allow generating configuration file by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to combine the teaching of Land with Khan. Creating configuration file at dealer location is known in the art as evident by Land in ¶0023 and ¶0025. The claimed invention is merely a combination of old elements, and in the combination each element merely would have performed the same function as it did separately, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. Regarding claim 2, Khan and Land teaches, The method of claim 1, further comprising: displaying, by the mobile device, the configuration file downloaded from the central storage unit; and (Khan in Column 15 Line 58-65 teaches, The user interface generator 670 is a component that generates a user interface allowing a user (e.g., field engineer) to generate and execute various instructions for operating the controller device 410 disclosed herein. In one aspect, the user interface generator 670 generates a user interface that allows a user to authenticate retrieving configuration data) before transmitting, by the mobile device, the downloaded configuration file to the HVAC control unit, obtaining, by the mobile device, a confirmation from a user at the operation site. (Khan in Column 15 Line 58-65 teaches, the user interface generator 670 generates a user interface that allows a user to authenticate retrieving configuration data, modifying configuration data, and uploading modified configuration data) Regarding claim 3, Khan and Land teaches, The method of claim 2, further comprising: before obtaining, by the mobile device, the confirmation from the user, determining, by the mobile device, that a local connection at the operation site between the mobile device and the HVAC control unit is established. (Khan in Column 20 Line 48-55 teaches, a field engineer may place the controller device 410 near (e.g., within 5 inch) the edge device 460, and the controller device 410 may detect the edge device 460 through a short range communication (e.g., near field communication, Bluetooth Low Energy communication, etc.). After detecting the edge devices 460, the controller device 410 generates a list of detected edge devices 460, and forwards the list to the server 430 through a connection 415 (e.g., wired, WLAN or cellular connection). Regarding claim 4, Khan and Land teaches, The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing, by the computing device, the configuration file with identity information including at least one of first HVAC object information, first user information and first HVAC service information of the HVAC system to be delivered to the operation site; and (Khan in Column 20 Line 5-10 teaches, server transmits the requested configuration data to the edge device 460 identified by the received identification through the edge device communication interface 820 before transmitting, by the mobile device, the downloaded configuration file to the HVAC control unit, checking, by the mobile device, whether the identity information comprised in the downloaded configuration file corresponds to installation information comprised in the HVAC system located at the operation site, wherein the installation information comprises at least one of second HVAC object information, second user information and second HVAC service information of the HVAC system located at the operation site. (Khan in Column 15 Line 10-20 teaches, the configuration data retriever 652 of the controller device 410 transmits a request for configuration data for one or more edge devices 460 through the server communication interface 610. In response to the request, the configuration data retriever 652 receives, through the server communication interface 610, requested configuration data and stores the received configuration data at a local storage (e.g., memory 650). The configuration data stored may be indexed by corresponding identifications of edge devices 460.) Regarding claim 5, Khan and Land teaches, The method of claim 1, further comprising: storing, by the central storage unit, a first parameter set comprising a plurality of operation site parameters obtained from the operation site; (Khan in Column 19 Line 40-58 teaches storing configuration data indexed by corresponding identifications (site parameter) of edge devices 460 in memory of server 430. Column 10 Line 51 teaches, “The edge device 460 is a HVAC”) storing, by the central storage unit, a second parameter set comprising a plurality of HVAC configuration parameters of the HVAC system to be delivered to the operation site; and (Khan in Column 19 Line 40-58 teaches storing target set points and determines operating parameters of edge devices. Column 10 Line 51 teaches, “The edge device 460 is a HVAC”) generating, by the computing device, the configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system on the basis of the first parameter set and the second parameter set stored in the central storage unit. (Khan in Column 19 Line 40-55 teaches configuration data generator 852 of server 430 generates configuration data) Regarding claim 6, Khan and Land teaches, The method of claim 5, further comprising: storing, by the central storage unit, a plurality of previous first parameter sets, wherein each set comprises a plurality of previous operation site parameters obtained from a corresponding previous operation site; (Khan in Column 19 Line 59-67 teaches server storing identifications of the edge devices sent by the controller device 410) storing, by the central storage unit, a plurality of previous second parameter sets, wherein each set comprises a plurality of previous HVAC configuration parameters of a corresponding previous HVAC system; (Khan in Column 19 Line 59-67 teaches server storing configuration data of the edge devices sent by the controller device 410) generating, by the computing device, a plurality of previous configuration files each associated with any one set comprised in the plurality of previous first parameter sets and any one set comprised in the plurality of previous second parameter sets; (Khan in Column 19 Line 59-67 teaches server storing configuration data identified by corresponding identifications of the edge devices) matching, by the computing device, the stored first parameter set with a previous first parameter set comprised in the plurality of previous first parameter sets; (Khan in Column 20 Line 1-16 teaches configuration data transmitter 858 identifying an edge device by the received identification) matching, by the computing device, the stored second parameter set with a previous second parameter set comprised in the plurality of previous second parameter sets; and (Khan in Column 20 Line 1-16 teaches configuration data transmitter 858 identifying configuration data based on the received identification of edge device) obtaining, by the computing device, the configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system on the basis of the plurality of previous configuration files. (Khan in Column 15 Line 7-20 teaches configuration data retriever 652 of controller device retrieves and stores configuration data from the server.) Regarding claim 10, Khan teaches, A method for configuring and commissioning an HVAC system, comprising: storing, by a central storage unit, a first parameter set comprising a plurality of operation site parameters obtained from an operation site, where the HVAC system is to be installed; (Column 19 Line 40-58 teaches storing configuration data indexed by corresponding identifications (site parameter) of edge devices 460 in memory of server 430. Column 10 Line 51 teaches, “The edge device 460 is a HVAC”) storing, by the central storage unit, a second parameter set comprising a plurality of HVAC configuration parameters of the HVAC system; (Column 19 Line 40-58 teaches storing target set points and determines operating parameters of edge devices. Column 10 Line 51 teaches, “The edge device 460 is a HVAC”) generating, by a computing device,…. a configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system such that the HVAC system is brought into operation, wherein the configuration file is generated ….on the basis of the first parameter set and the second parameter set stored in the central storage unit; and (Column 19 Line 40-58 teaches configuration data generator 852 of server 430 generates configuration data based on target set points and identifications of edge devices) commissioning, by an HVAC control unit comprised in the HVAC system, the HVAC system located at the operation site with the transmitted configuration file. (Column 15 Line 7-20 teaches configuration data retriever 652 of controller device retrieves and stores configuration data from the server. Column 13 Line 1-5 teaches, the controller device may automatically connect to multiple edge devices within the predetermined distance through wireless networks hosted by the edge devices and transmit configuration data through the wireless networks. Column 13 Line 5-7 teaches, the controller device 410 may configure multiple edge devices within the predetermined distance through a seamless process) Khan doesn’t teach, generating, by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold and that is different than the operation site, a configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system such that the HVAC system is brought into operation, wherein the configuration file is generated at the configuration site (Khan in Column 19 Line 40-55 teaches computing device (server 430) generating configuration data. However it doesn’t teach the configuration data is generated by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold. Land in ¶0023 teaches, server system 120 may facilitate the ability of the client system 130 to specify and program the configuration of the controller 104 at a customer's site and the server system 120 may allow the client system 130 to establish (create), edit, and/or manage templates of configuration parameters and/or settings. Also teaches, the server system 120 may allow the client system 130 to remotely push individual and/or bulk parameters or settings to the installed system (e.g., controller 104). ¶0023 also teaches, the client system 130 located at a dealer location (“computer at the dealer location”). ¶0010 teaches HVAC systems located at customer location) Land is an art in the area of interest as it teaches, configuring electronically programmable heating, ventilation, and/or air conditioning (“HVAC”) (see Abstract). A combination of Land with Khan would allow generating configuration file by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to combine the teaching of Land with Khan. Creating configuration file at dealer location is known in the art as evident by Land in ¶0023 and ¶0025. The claimed invention is merely a combination of old elements, and in the combination each element merely would have performed the same function as it did separately, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. Regarding claim 11, Khan and Land teaches, The method of claim 10, further comprising: storing, by the central storage unit, a plurality of previous first parameter sets, wherein each set comprises a plurality of previous operation site parameters obtained from a corresponding previous operation site; (Khan in Column 19 Line 59-67 teaches server storing identifications of the edge devices sent by the controller device 410) storing, by the central storage unit, a plurality of previous second parameter sets, wherein each set comprises a plurality of previous HVAC configuration parameters of a corresponding previous HVAC system; (Khan in Column 19 Line 59-67 teaches server storing configuration data of the edge devices sent by the controller device 410) generating, by the computing device, a plurality of previous configuration files each associated with any one set comprised in the plurality of previous first parameter sets and any one set comprised in the plurality of previous second parameter sets; (Khan in Column 19 Line 59-67 teaches server storing configuration data identified by corresponding identifications of the edge devices) matching, by the computing device, the stored first parameter set with a previous first parameter set comprised in the plurality of previous first parameter sets; (Khan in Column 20 Line 1-16 teaches configuration data transmitter 858 identifying an edge device by the received identification) matching, by the computing device, the stored second parameter set with a previous second parameter set comprised in the plurality of previous second parameter sets; and (Khan in Column 20 Line 1-16 teaches configuration data transmitter 858 identifying configuration data based on the received identification of edge device) obtaining, by the computing device, the configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system on the basis of the plurality of previous configuration files. (Khan in Column 15 Line 7-20 teaches configuration data retriever 652 of controller device retrieves and stores configuration data from the server.) Regarding claim 12, Khan teaches, A system for configuring and commissioning an HVAC system, comprising a computing device, a central storage unit, a mobile device and the HVAC system, wherein: (Khan in Column 10 Line 36-50 teaches, a server 430 (computing device), Column 19 Line 20-25 teaches memory 850 (central storage device), Column 10 Line 50-52 teaches The edge device 460 is a HVAC device and Column 10 Line 35-40 teaches, “the controller device 410 is implemented as a smart phone”) the computing device is…. configured to generate a configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system such that the HVAC system is brought into operation, (Khan in Column 19 Line 40-55 teaches configuration data generator 852 of server 430 generates configuration data) the computing device is further configured to upload the generated configuration file to the central storage unit; (Khan in Column 4 Line 40-44 teaches, A server (also referred to as “a central computing device”) generates and stores configuration data specifying one or more parameters of the edge devices for climate control. Column 19 Line 43-45 teaches configuration data generator 852 of server 430 stores the default values of the operating parameters at the memory 850. the mobile device is configured to download the uploaded configuration file from the central storage unit, and to transmit the downloaded configuration file to an HVAC control unit comprised in the HVAC system located at the operation site; and (Khan in Column 15 Line 7-20 teaches configuration data retriever 652 of controller device retrieves and stores configuration data from the server. Column 11 Line 35-40 teaches, “the controller device 410 is implemented as a smart phone”. Column 13 Line 1-5 teaches, the controller device may automatically connect to multiple edge devices within the predetermined distance through wireless networks hosted by the edge devices and transmit configuration data through the wireless networks. Column 18 Line 7-15 teaches edge device includes a HVAC controller.) the HVAC control unit is configured to commission the HVAC system located at the operation site with the transmitted configuration file. (Khan in Column 13 Line 5-7 teaches, the controller device 410 may configure multiple edge devices within the predetermined distance through a seamless process. Column 18 Line 7-15 teaches edge device includes a HVAC controller.) Khan doesn’t teach, the computing device is located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold and is configured to generate a configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system such that the HVAC system is brought into operation, wherein the configuration file is generated at the configuration site and the HVAC system is to be delivered to an operation site where the HVAC system is to be installed and that is different than the configuration site; (Khan in Column 19 Line 40-55 teaches computing device (server 430) generating configuration data. However it doesn’t teach the configuration data is generated by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold. Land in ¶0023 teaches, server system 120 may facilitate the ability of the client system 130 to specify and program the configuration of the controller 104 at a customer's site and the server system 120 may allow the client system 130 to establish (create), edit, and/or manage templates of configuration parameters and/or settings. Also teaches, the server system 120 may allow the client system 130 to remotely push individual and/or bulk parameters or settings to the installed system (e.g., controller 104). ¶0023 also teaches, the client system 130 located at a dealer location (“computer at the dealer location”). ¶0010 teaches HVAC systems located at customer location) Land is an art in the area of interest as it teaches, configuring electronically programmable heating, ventilation, and/or air conditioning (“HVAC”) (see Abstract). A combination of Land with Khan would allow generating configuration file by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to combine the teaching of Land with Khan. Creating configuration file at dealer location is known in the art as evident by Land in ¶0023 and ¶0025. The claimed invention is merely a combination of old elements, and in the combination each element merely would have performed the same function as it did separately, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. Regarding claim 13, Khan teaches, A system for configuring and commissioning an HVAC system, comprising a computing device, a central storage unit, a mobile device and the HVAC system, wherein: (Column 10 Line 36-50 teaches, a server 430 (computing device), Column 19 Line 20-25 teaches memory 850 (central storage device), Column 10 Line 50-52 teaches The edge device 460 is a HVAC device and Column 10 Line 35-40 teaches, “the controller device 410 is implemented as a smart phone”) the central storage unit is configured to store a first parameter set comprising a plurality of operation site parameters obtained from an operation site, where the HVAC system is to be installed; (Column 19 Line 40-58 teaches storing configuration data indexed by corresponding identifications (site parameter) of edge devices 460 in memory of server 430. Column 10 Line 51 teaches, “The edge device 460 is a HVAC”. Column 5 line 40-54 teaches HVAC is located at building 10) the central storage unit is further configured to store a second parameter set comprising a plurality of HVAC configuration parameters of the HVAC system; (Column 19 Line 40-58 teaches storing target set points and determines operating parameters of edge devices. Column 10 Line 51 teaches, “The edge device 460 is a HVAC”) the computing device ….is configured to generate a configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system such that the HVAC system is brought into operation, wherein the configuration file is generated … on the basis of the first parameter set and the second parameter set stored in the central storage unit; and (Column 19 Line 40-58 teaches configuration data generator 852 of server 430 generates configuration data based on target set points and identifications of edge devices) an HVAC control unit comprised in the HVAC system is configured to commission the HVAC system located at the operation site with the transmitted configuration file. (Column 15 Line 7-20 teaches configuration data retriever 652 of controller device retrieves and stores configuration data from the server. Column 13 Line 1-5 teaches, the controller device may automatically connect to multiple edge devices within the predetermined distance through wireless networks hosted by the edge devices and transmit configuration data through the wireless networks. Column 13 Line 5-7 teaches, the controller device 410 may configure multiple edge devices within the predetermined distance through a seamless process) Khan doesn’t teach, the computing device is located at a configuration site, which is where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold and which is different than the operation site, and is configured to generate a configuration file for commissioning the HVAC system such that the HVAC system is brought into operation, wherein the configuration file is generated at the configuration site (Khan in Column 19 Line 40-55 teaches computing device (server 430) generating configuration data. However it doesn’t teach the configuration data is generated by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold. Land in ¶0023 teaches, server system 120 may facilitate the ability of the client system 130 to specify and program the configuration of the controller 104 at a customer's site and the server system 120 may allow the client system 130 to establish (create), edit, and/or manage templates of configuration parameters and/or settings. Also teaches, the server system 120 may allow the client system 130 to remotely push individual and/or bulk parameters or settings to the installed system (e.g., controller 104). ¶0023 also teaches, the client system 130 located at a dealer location (“computer at the dealer location”). ¶0010 teaches HVAC systems located at customer location) Land is an art in the area of interest as it teaches, configuring electronically programmable heating, ventilation, and/or air conditioning (“HVAC”) (see Abstract). A combination of Land with Khan would allow generating configuration file by a computing device located at a configuration site where the HVAC system is manufactured or sold. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to combine the teaching of Land with Khan. Creating configuration file at dealer location is known in the art as evident by Land in ¶0023 and ¶0025. The claimed invention is merely a combination of old elements, and in the combination each element merely would have performed the same function as it did separately, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. Regarding claim 14, Khan and Land teaches, A computing device comprising a non-transitory computer readable media with a computer program stored thereon with instructions which, when being executed by the computing device, cause the computing device to carry out the steps of the method of claim 1. (Khan in Column 19 Line 18-39 teaches, the processing circuit 840 of server 430 includes a processor 845 , and memory 850 storing instructions ( or program code ) executable by the processor 845.) Regarding claim 15, Khan and Land teaches, A mobile device comprising a non-transitory computer readable media with a computer program stored thereon with instructions which, when being executed by the mobile device, cause the mobile device to carry out the steps of the method of claim 1. (Khan in Column 14 Line 51-67 teaches, the processing circuit 640 of controller device 410 includes a processor 645, and memory 650 storing instructions (or program code) executable by the processor 645. Column 11 Line 35-40 teaches, “the controller device 410 is implemented as a smart phone”) Regarding claim 16, Khan and Land teaches, A computing device comprising a non-transitory computer readable media with a computer program stored thereon with instructions which, when being executed by the computing device, cause the computing device to carry out the steps of the method of claim 10. (Khan in Column 19 Line 18-39 teaches, the processing circuit 840 of server 430 includes a processor 845 , and memory 850 storing instructions ( or program code ) executable by the processor 845.) Regarding claim 17, Khan and Land teaches, A mobile device comprising a non-transitory computer readable media with a computer program stored thereon with instructions which, when being executed by the mobile device, cause the mobile device to carry out the steps of the method of claim 10. (Khan in Column 14 Line 51-67 teaches, the processing circuit 640 of controller device 410 includes a processor 645, and memory 650 storing instructions (or program code) executable by the processor 645. Column 11 Line 35-40 teaches, “the controller device 410 is implemented as a smart phone”) Claim(s) 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KHAN (US10778460B1) in view of Land (US20160116179A1) and further in view of Atchison (US20180031262A1) Regarding claim 7, Khan and Land as modified doesn’t explicitly teach, The method of claim 1,further comprising: providing, by the central storage unit, the uploaded configuration file with test run data for validation of the HVAC system and expected test result data associated with the test run data; (Atchison in ¶0056 teaches, the system controller 300 may instruct one or more components of the HVAC system 100 to perform a self-diagnostic check and provide the results to the system controller 300. Information about the components and correct operation may be stored in the memory 316 of the system controller 300 and may be accessed on the user interface 302 or may be stored on the network 318 and may be available using the communications interface 310) initiating, by the HVAC control unit, a test run on the HVAC system located at the operation site according to the test run data comprised in the configuration file transmitted from the mobile device; and (Atchison in ¶0056 teaches, a system diagnostic is performed at process block 612) generating, by the HVAC control unit, validation analysis data on the basis of actual test result data obtained from the initiated test run and the expected test result data comprised in the configuration file transmitted from the mobile device. (Atchison in ¶0056 teaches, at process block 614, the processor evaluates the results of the system diagnostics check and provides the results to the technician using the user interface 302. For example, the user interface 302 will display an alert if a component of the HVAC system 100 is not operating correctly.) Atchison is an art in the area of interest as it teaches, an HVAC system (see Abstract). A combination of Atchison with Khan and Land would allow the combine system to perform validation of the HVAC system using the configuration information. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to combine the teaching of Atchison with Khan and Land. One would have been motivated to do so because doing so will allow the system to perform a diagnostics check to ensure proper function of all the HVAC components after commissioning, as taught by Atchison in ¶0047. Regarding claim 8, Khan, Land and Atchison teaches, The method of claim 7, further comprising: transmitting, by the HVAC control unit, the obtained actual test result data to the central storage unit, wherein the obtained actual test result data is directly transmitted to the central storage unit and/or transmitted to the central storage unit via the mobile device; (Atchison in ¶0056 and Fig. 6 step 614 teaches receiving diagnostic results) and generating, by the central storage unit and/or by the mobile device, validation analysis data on the basis of the transmitted actual test result data and the expected test result data comprised in the configuration file. (Atchison in ¶0056 teaches, At process block 614, the processor evaluates the results of the system diagnostics check and provides the results to the technician using the user interface 302.) Regarding claim 9, Khan, Land and Atchison teaches, The method of claim 7, further comprising: receiving, by the mobile device, the generated validation analysis data from the HVAC control unit or the central storage unit; (Atchison in ¶0056 teaches user interface 302 receiving result of the system diagnostics check) generating, by the mobile device, user instructions on the basis of the transmitted validation analysis data; and (Atchison in ¶0056 teaches generating an alert if a component of the HVAC system 100 is not operating correctly) displaying, by the mobile device, the generated user instructions and/or the transmitted validation analysis data. (Atchison in ¶0056 teaches, the user interface 302 will display an alert if a component of the HVAC system 100 is not operating correctly) Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ISTIAQUE AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-7087. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 10AM -6PM and alternate Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth M Lo can be reached at (571) 272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ISTIAQUE AHMED/Examiner, Art Unit 2116 /KENNETH M LO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 18, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Dec 30, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 30, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595925
AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12541192
Operator Display Switching Preview
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12541804
POWER CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12535778
METHOD AND INTERNET OF THINGS (IoTs) SYSTEM FOR SMART GAS FIREFIGHTING LINKAGE BASED ON GOVERNMENT SAFETY SUPERVISION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12480677
GENERATING DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+17.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 194 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month