Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/547,154

Method for Determining at least One System State by Means of a Kalman Filter

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Aug 19, 2023
Priority
Feb 24, 2021 — DE 10 2021 104 425.1 +2 more
Examiner
GRIFFIN, ALEX BROCK
Art Unit
3665
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
3 (Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allowance Rate
11 granted / 22 resolved
-2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +52% interview lift
Without
With
+52.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
59
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
82.2%
+42.2% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 22 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Introduction This is a response to applicant’s submissions filed on March 3, 3036. Claims 2-8 are pending. Examiner' s Note Examiner has cited particular paragraphs / columns and line numbers or figures in the references as applied to the claims below for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant, in preparing the responses, to fully consider the references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Applicant is reminded that the Examiner is entitled to give the broadest reasonable interpretation to the language of the claims. Furthermore, the Examiner is not limited to Applicants' definition which is not specifically set forth in the disclosure. Response to Arguments All of applicant’s arguments filed March 3, 2026 have been considered. Regarding applicant’s argument that a skilled person would understand that the determination of the system state and the corrected item of information are included as parts of the invention (Applicant’s Response, pg. 7),the examiner agrees. Regarding applicant’s argument that a skilled person would understand that the context of automated or autonomous driving includes operating the vehicle for autonomous or partially autonomous movement (Applicant’s Response, pg. 7), the examiner respectfully disagrees. It is noted that a person of ordinary skill could interpret the context as outputting information to a driver, for example. There is nothing in the specification expressly, implicitly, or inherently using the invention for movement of a vehicle. Drawings The drawings were received on March 3, 2026. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 2-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. In claim 2, lines 12-13, and claim 4, lines 21-13, the limitation “operating a vehicle for autonomous or partially autonomous movement based on the corrected item of information” appears to be new matter. Paragraph 0007 states that the vehicle is configured for at least partially automated or autonomous driving operation, but there is not detail stating the vehicle uses the corrected item of information during the driving operation. Claims 3 and 5-8 are also rejected as being dependent upon a rejected base claim as they do not clear the deficiencies of the claims from which they depend. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX GRIFFIN whose telephone number is (703)756-1516. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ERIN BISHOP can be reached at (571)270-3713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX B GRIFFIN/Examiner, Art Unit 3665 /Erin D Bishop/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2023
Application Filed
May 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 12, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 03, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638589
VEHICLE CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12623665
DRIVE ASSIST APPARATUS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612016
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING PLANNING METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12534090
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF A LOAD SHIFT AT A VEHICLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12522167
CONTROL DEVICE FOR A PERSONAL PROTECTION SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.4%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 22 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month