Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/547,247

METHOD FOR PRODUCING NICKEL SULFATE SOLUTION FOR SECONDARY BATTERY FROM NICKEL CATHODE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Examiner
RUMP, RICHARD M
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kemco
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
782 granted / 1054 resolved
+9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1096
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1054 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Status of Application Claim 1 is pending and presented for examination. Priority Acknowledgement is made of applicant's request for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(a)-(d). Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by “Fabrication of LiNiO2 using NiSO4 Recovered from NCM (Li[Ni,Co,Mn]O2) Secondary Battery Scraps and Its Electrochemical Properties” to Kwang et al. (hereinafter, “Kwang at __”). Regarding claim 1, Kwang discloses a method of forming nickel sulfate solution (Kwang at 287 R col) comprising: Leaching a nickel cathode material to produce a leachate (NCM, “Title” & “Table 1”); Producing a neutralized solution from the leachate (289 R col); and Producing a filtrate from the neutralized solution (290 L col). Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WO2021226719 to Sonoc et al. (hereinafter, “Sonoc at __”; cited and provided by Applicants, with citations to the US equivalent of US PG Pub No. 20230187720). Regarding claim 1, Sonoc discloses a method of making a nickel sulfate solution (Sonoc at [0076]) comprising: Leaching a nickel cathode (lithium-ion battery containing Ni, Sonoc at “Abstract”) to produce a leachate (via formic acid to form a formate); Neutralizing the solution to produce a neutralized solution rom the leachate ([0048]) Producing a filtrate from the neutralized solution ([0033]). While Sonoc does later dewater the nickel sulfate, it is still in a solution prior to this step. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by RU2364641 to Evich et al. (hereinafter, “Evich at __”; cited and provided by Applicants). Regarding claim 1, Evich discloses a method of producing a nickel sulfate solution (Ishida at “Abstract”) comprising: Leaching a nickel cathode material (“Abstract”) to a sulfuric acid leach to produce a leachate (Id.); Neutralizing the solution via addition of soda ash (page 6 second paragraph); and Filtering the neutralized solution to form a filtrate (Id.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C> 103 as being unpatentable over WO2022094706 to Fraser et al. (hereinafter, “Fraser at __”; citation made to the US equivalent of US20230049318) in view of JP2017115179 to Kamihara et al. (hereinafter, “Kamihara at __”). Regarding claim 1, Fraser discloses a method of making a crystallized nickel sulfate which requires formation of a solution of such (Fraser at “Abstract”) comprising: Leaching a nickel material to produce a leachate ([0026]); Neutralizing the leached solution to form a neutralized solution (Id.); and Filtering the neutralized solution to produce a filtrate ([0044]). However, Fraser does not expressly state that the nickel material is a nickel cathode. Kamihara, in a method of recovering nickel sulfate from a nickel cathode (Kamihara at “Abstract” & 2 [9]) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the instantly claimed invention to perform the method of Fraser in view of the nickel cathode material of Kamihara. The teaching or suggested motivation in doing so being recovery of valuable metals such as Co, Ni, and Mn from a base nickel cathode source and this imparts a predictable result to combine these together (see KSR v Teleflex 398 550 U.S. (2007)). Conclusion Claim 1 is rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD M RUMP whose telephone number is (571)270-5848. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 06:45 AM to 04:45 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duane Smith can be reached at 571-272-1166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RICHARD M. RUMP Primary Examiner Art Unit 1759 /RICHARD M RUMP/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595213
PREPARATION METHOD OF SUB-MICRON POWDER OF HIGH-ENTROPY NITRIDE VIA NITRIDE THERMAL REDUCTION WITH SOFT MECHANO-CHEMICAL ASSISTANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582964
PURIFICATION OF AMINES BY ADSORPTION USING A SUPER ADSORBENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577366
CATALYSTS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING RECYCLED POLYESTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577461
A METHOD FOR PRODUCING QUANTUM DOTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577112
CARBON FIBER MATERIALS FROM WASTE POLYETHYLENE AND POLYETHYLENE OIL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+20.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1054 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month