Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/547,251

POLYFLUORINATED CANNABINOID AND CANNABINOID-LIKE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Priority
Feb 23, 2021 — provisional 63/152,674 +1 more
Examiner
SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Burkhard Koenig
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
117 granted / 170 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
240
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 170 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims Claims 1-12 are pending and are examined on their merits. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kyulux (US 2020/0136060 A1 published on April 30th 2020). Claim 1 is directed towards a compound of Formula I: PNG media_image1.png 182 130 media_image1.png Greyscale . Kyulux teaches PNG media_image2.png 205 142 media_image2.png Greyscale (Kyulux, pg. 117), which is anticipatory of claim 1. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Burton (Burton et al., Preparation of p-substituted tetrafluoropyridyl derivatives via the tetrafluoropyridylcopper reagent, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, Volume 135, 2012, Pages 144-154). Claim 7 is directed to a compound of Formula II: PNG media_image3.png 188 159 media_image3.png Greyscale . Burton teaches PNG media_image4.png 225 329 media_image4.png Greyscale (Burton, pg. 146, compound 10), anticipating claim 7. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6 and 8-12 are free of the prior art. Claims 11-12 are allowed. Applicant has developed a series of polyfluorinated cannabinoid derivatives falling into the compound genera of Formulas I, II, and III: PNG media_image1.png 182 130 media_image1.png Greyscale (I) PNG media_image3.png 188 159 media_image3.png Greyscale (II) PNG media_image5.png 194 201 media_image5.png Greyscale .(III). Compounds of Formula I and II are found in the prior art in Kyulux (US 2020/0136060 A1 published on April 30th 2020) and Burton (Burton et al., Preparation of p-substituted tetrafluoropyridyl derivatives via the tetrafluoropyridylcopper reagent, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, Volume 135, 2012, Pages 144-154), respectively. Formula III is free of the prior art. However, the compounds of Kyulux and Burton are relevant in the fields of organic light-emitting diodes and general organic synthesis, respectively, are not of particular relevance to applicant’s cannabinoid compounds, and only incidentally anticipate Formulas I and II. Thus, applicant’s further embodied compounds and further limitations to the R groups are nonobvious. Claims 2-6 and 8-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anthony Seitz whose telephone number is (703)756-4657. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 AM ET - 5:00 PM ET M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Lundgren can be reached at (571)272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.J.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1629 /JEFFREY S LUNDGREN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637424
A PHARMACEUTICAL SALT OF AN ARYLPYRROLE DERIVATIVE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630559
SPIROCYCLIC-SUBSTITUTED 6,7-DIHYDRO-PYRANO[2,3-d]PYRIMIDINE INHIBITORS OF KRAS G12C MUTANT
2y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630546
RNF4 TARGETING COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12606537
THIOPHENE DERIVATIVES
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606550
METHODS FOR SYNTHESIS OF CHK1 INHIBITORS
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+28.3%)
3y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 170 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month