Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/547,615

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING DEFAULT BEAM AND PATHLOSS REFERENCE SIGNAL FOR TRANSMISSION OF UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 23, 2023
Priority
Mar 19, 2021 — IN 202131011740 +1 more
Examiner
PEREZ GUTIERREZ, RAFAEL
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
19%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
28%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 19% of cases
19%
Career Allowance Rate
35 granted / 181 resolved
-42.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
245
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
85.6%
+45.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 181 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species I, claims 1-8 in the reply filed on February 26, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Species I and Species II are essentially and mutually linked for the reasons set forth on pages 3 and 4 of the remarks. This is found persuasive. The requirement is therefore withdrawn and all claims are being examined below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu (US Pub. 2023/0261719). Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses a terminal in a communication system, the terminal comprising: a transceiver; and a controller (par.080 transceiver and “a processor” which reads on “a controller”) configured to: receive, from a base station, a higher layer parameter enabling a default beam and a default pathloss reference signal (RS) for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) (par.036 “On the other hand…..higher layer parameter to ‘enable’, which means that a default spatial relation and a default PL-RS”), identify a spatial relation for the PUCCH (par.007 “the higher layer parameters related to spatial relation is PUCCH-spatialRelationInfo”), transmit, to the base station, the PUCCH based on the spatial relation, wherein the spatial relation for the PUCCH is associated with a transmission configuration indication (TCI) state of a control resource set (CORESET) with the lowest ID on an active downlink (DL) BWP (par.003 “The default spatial relation….dedicated-PUCCH resource….The UE may determine the default spatial relation by the activated TCI state with the lowest ID….in the active DL-BWP”, par.008 “each of the activated TCI states…..is associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value”, par.058 “CoresetsPoolindex=0”), and wherein, in case that the CORESET corresponds to more than one activated TCI state, the spatial relation for the PUCCH is associated with a first TCI state among the more than one activated TCI state (par.008 “TCI states……each of the activated TCI states…..is associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value”, par.058 “CoresetsPoolindex=0”). Regarding claims 2, 6, 10 and 14, Liu discloses identify a pathloss RS index used to determine power for the PUCCH, wherein the pathloss RS index is associated with the TCI state of the CORESET with the lowest ID on an active DL BWP, and wherein, in case that the CORESET corresponds to more than one activated TCI state, the pathloss RS index is associated with the first TCI state among the more than one activated TCI state (par.008 “a first TCI state pointed to by the lowest TCI codepoint….each of the activated TCI states….associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value……determining the default PL-RS comprises determining a RS resource index”). Regarding claims 3, 7, 11 and 15, Liu discloses value of CORESET pool index does not corresponds to 1 for any CORESET (par.058 CORESETs in the PCell are associated with CORESETPoolindex=0”), or the value of CORESET pool index corresponds to 1 for all CORESETs (par.058 “while other CORESETs in the PCell are associated with CORESETPoolindex=1 (i.e. associated with TRP1)”). Regarding claims 4, 8 and 12, Liu discloses a dedicated pathloss RS for the PUCCH and a dedicated spatial relation for the PUCCH are not configured from the base station (par.035 “The spatial relation and the PL-RS….may not configured for the target uplink signa”, par.061 “dedicated PUCCH resource without configured spatial relation and PL-RS”). Regarding claim 5, Liu discloses a method performed by a terminal in a communication system, the method comprising: receive, from a base station, a higher layer parameter enabling a default beam and a default pathloss reference signal (RS) for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) (par.036 “On the other hand…..higher layer parameter to ‘enable’, which means that a default spatial relation and a default PL-RS”), identify a spatial relation for the PUCCH (par.007 “the higher layer parameters related to spatial relation is PUCCH-spatialRelationInfo”), transmit, to the base station, the PUCCH based on the spatial relation, wherein the spatial relation for the PUCCH is associated with a transmission configuration indication (TCI) state of a control resource set (CORESET) with the lowest ID on an active downlink (DL) BWP (par.003 “The default spatial relation….dedicated-PUCCH resource….The UE may determine the default spatial relation by the activated TCI state with the lowest ID….in the active DL-BWP”, par.008 “each of the activated TCI states…..is associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value”, par.058 “CoresetsPoolindex=0”), and wherein, in case that the CORESET corresponds to more than one activated TCI state, the spatial relation for the PUCCH is associated with a first TCI state among the more than one activated TCI state (par.008 “TCI states……each of the activated TCI states…..is associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value”, par.058 “CoresetsPoolindex=0”). Regarding claim 9, Liu discloses base station in a communication system, the base station comprising: a transceiver; and a controller (par.080 “The gNB…includes a processor, a memory, and a transceiver”) configured to: transmit, to a terminal, a higher layer parameter enabling a default beam and a default pathloss reference signal (RS) for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) (par.036 “On the other hand…..higher layer parameter to ‘enable’, which means that a default spatial relation and a default PL-RS”), and receive, from the terminal, the PUCCH based on the spatial relation, wherein the spatial relation for the PUCCH is associated with a transmission configuration indication (TCI) state of a control resource set (CORESET) with the lowest ID on an active downlink (DL) BWP (par.003 “The default spatial relation….dedicated-PUCCH resource….The UE may determine the default spatial relation by the activated TCI state with the lowest ID….in the active DL-BWP”, par.008 “each of the activated TCI states…..is associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value”, par.058 “CoresetsPoolindex=0”), and wherein, in case that the CORESET corresponds to more than one activated TCI state, the spatial relation for the PUCCH is associated with a first TCI state among the more than one activated TCI state (par.008 “TCI states……each of the activated TCI states…..is associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value”, par.058 “CoresetsPoolindex=0”). Regarding claim 13, Liu discloses a method perform by a base station in a communication system, the base station comprising: transmit, to a terminal, a higher layer parameter enabling a default beam and a default pathloss reference signal (RS) for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) (par.036 “On the other hand…..higher layer parameter to ‘enable’, which means that a default spatial relation and a default PL-RS”), and receive, from the terminal, the PUCCH based on the spatial relation, wherein the spatial relation for the PUCCH is associated with a transmission configuration indication (TCI) state of a control resource set (CORESET) with the lowest ID on an active downlink (DL) BWP (par.003 “The default spatial relation….dedicated-PUCCH resource….The UE may determine the default spatial relation by the activated TCI state with the lowest ID….in the active DL-BWP”, par.008 “each of the activated TCI states…..is associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value”, par.058 “CoresetsPoolindex=0”), and wherein, in case that the CORESET corresponds to more than one activated TCI state, the spatial relation for the PUCCH is associated with a first TCI state among the more than one activated TCI state (par.008 “TCI states……each of the activated TCI states…..is associated with a CORESETPoolIndex value”, par.058 “CoresetsPoolindex=0”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Tu Nguyen whose telephone number is (571)272-7883. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-5PM Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor Rafael Perez-Gutierrez can be reached on 571-272-7915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300 or mailed to: Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Hand-delivered responses should be brought to Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Delany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TU X. NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672095
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665661
SYNCHRONIZATION OF UPLINK TRANSMISSION FROM A USER EQUIPMENT (UE) IN A NON-TERRESTRIAL WIRELESS NETWORK (NTN)
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659696
COMMUNICATION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM ON PACKET DATA CONVERGENCE PROTOCOL (PDCP)
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659903
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659906
NON-ACCESS STRATUS (NAS) SIGNALING CONNECTION HANDLING FOR PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETEWORK (PLMN) SELECTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
19%
Grant Probability
28%
With Interview (+8.3%)
4y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 181 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month