Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/547,676

RENDERING ADDITIONAL CONTENT FOR A STREAMED PIECE OF AUDIO CONTENT BY USING WATERMARK-BASED IDENTIFICATION

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Aug 23, 2023
Examiner
JAIN, ANKUR
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sonobeacon GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
436 granted / 583 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
592
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 583 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 19 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter due to a computer-readable medium not being defined to exclude transitory propagating signals, and thus ineligible. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Levy (US 20030021441). Regarding Claim 1, 10, 19, Levy discloses server comprising a database configured to store a look-up table between identification numbers of a plurality of pieces of audio content identifying a specific piece of audio content of a plurality of pieces of audio content and providing additional related content on a mobile device (paragraph [0005, 0013, 0058]), comprising: modulating an audio watermark onto each piece of audio content of the plurality of pieces of audio content (paragraph [0005, 0013, 0058]), a first server comprising a database configured to store a plurality of pieces of audio content modulated, wherein the audio watermark comprises a unique identification number for each piece of audio content (paragraph [0005, 0013, 0058)); a second server comprising a database configured to store a look-up table between identification numbers of a plurality of pieces of audio content and corresponding additional content (paragraph [0005, 0013, 0058); a network configured to connect the first server and the second server to a mobile device (Paragraphs 0005, 0013, 0058, Figures 1-4); storing said modulated pieces of audio content on a streaming platform (paragraph [0021]); opening a first identifying application on the mobile device, wherein the identifying application is configured to be capable of identifying a specific piece of audio content and providing related additional content (paragraphs [0076] and [0078]- [0080)); opening a second streaming application on the mobile device and playing back a specific piece of audio content, wherein the identifying application remains open in the background (paragraphs [0075] and [0078)}); receiving and demodulating, by the identifying application, the specific played back piece of audio content (paragraph [0078)); identifying, by the identifying application, the specific played back piece of audio content based on the identification number comprised in the audio watermark (paragraph [0058)); retrieving, by the identifying application, a specific additional content corresponding to the identified specific piece of audio content (paragraphs [0059] and [0133]); and rendering the specific additional content corresponding to the identified specific piece of audio content on a display of the mobile device (paragraph [0086)). Regarding Claim 2, Levy discloses wherein modulating the audio watermark onto each piece of the plurality of pieces of audio content comprises dividing the first 40 seconds of each piece of audio content into five time intervals and modulating a data signal onto each piece of audio content in each of said five intervals at least eight times (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 3, Levy discloses wherein each of said data signals has a size of 10 bits (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 4, Levy discloses wherein the five time intervals are of a same or of a different size (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 5, Levy discloses wherein the data signal of the first time interval comprises a start signal being identical for each piece of audio content of the plurality of pieces of audio content and is configured to trigger the step of identifying the specific piece of audio content by the first application, and wherein the data signals of the second to fifth time intervals are characteristic for each piece of audio content of the plurality of pieces of audio content. (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 6, Levy discloses wherein identifying the played back specific piece of audio content is based on the identifying application consulting a cache including a look-up table between the identification numbers of the plurality of pieces of audio content and their corresponding additional contents on the mobile device (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 7, Levy discloses wherein identifying the played back specific piece of audio content by the identifying application comprises trying to perform said identification already after receiving and demodulating merely the second or merely the second and the third data signal; and if said identification is already possible, rendering the specific additional content corresponding to the identified specific piece of audio content in the identifying application on the mobile device (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 8, Levy discloses wherein the last part of the identification number corresponding to the data signal of the fifth interval is unknown to the identifying application and is transmitted to a server for a confirmation (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 9, Levy discloses after receiving and demodulating all five data signals, transmitting the complete identification number to the server, wherein the part of the identification number corresponding to the first four data signals is transmitted as plain text and the last part of the identification number corresponding to the fifth data signal is transmitted in the form of a hash generated from the identification number (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 11, Levy discloses wherein the audio watermark comprises five data signals modulated onto each piece of audio content within five time intervals at least eight times (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 12, Levy discloses wherein each of said data signals has a size of 10 bits (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 13, Levy discloses wherein the five time intervals are of a same or of a different size (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 14, Levy discloses wherein the data signal of the first time interval comprises a start signal being identical for each piece of audio content of the plurality of pieces of audio content and is configured to trigger the identification process of the specific piece of audio content, and wherein the data signals of the second to fifth time intervals are characteristic for each piece of audio content of the plurality of pieces of audio content (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 15, Levy discloses wherein the mobile device is further configured to identify the played back specific piece of audio content based on consulting a cache including a look-up table between the identification numbers of the plurality of pieces of audio content and their corresponding additional contents comprised in the memory of the mobile device (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 16, Levy discloses wherein the mobile device is configured to try to identify the played back specific piece of audio content already after receiving and demodulating merely the second or merely the second and the third data signal and further to render the specific additional content corresponding to the identified specific piece of audio content on the display, if the identification has been possible (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 17, Levy discloses wherein the mobile device is unable to verify a last part of the identification number corresponding to the data signal of the fifth time interval and thus is configured to transmit said last part of the identification number to the second server for performing a confirmation (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Regarding Claim 18, Levy discloses wherein the mobile device is further configured to transmit the part of the identification number corresponding to the first four data signals as plain text and the last part of the identification number corresponding to the fifth data signal in the form of a hash generated from the identification number (Paragraph 0005, 0013, 0021, 0058-0059, 0075-0080, 0086, 0133; Figures 1-4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANKUR JAIN whose telephone number is (571)272-9747. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 10:00-6:00 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information /ANKUR JAIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604287
WIRELESS MODEM AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598606
PRIORITIZATION FOR SCHEDULING REQUEST AND PHYSICAL UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL WITHOUT LOGICAL CHANNEL ASSOCIATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598607
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12574099
Apparatus and Method for Transmitting or Receiving a Beam Direction Configuration
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573286
HEALTH CARE SANITATION MONITORING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+5.4%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 583 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month