Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/548,203

CONFIGURATION FOR QOE MEASUREMENT COLLECTION

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Aug 28, 2023
Priority
Feb 26, 2021 — provisional 63/154,560 +1 more
Examiner
MORLAN, ROBERT M
Art Unit
2409
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
367 granted / 495 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
512
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 495 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 4-11, 14-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Rune (US 2024/0098532) in view of Sakhnini (US 2021/0352506) and Hu (US 2023/0156767). Regarding Claims 1, 10, 11 and 20, Rune teaches base station for wireless communication (figure 3, see specifically eNB), comprising: at least one memory (figure 14, see specifically memory); and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory and configured to cause the base station (figure 14, see specifically processor) to: generate a first configuration for quality of experience (QoE) measurements (¶ [0010], see specifically configure application measurements), the first configuration comprising list of QoE measurement configurations to set up or to modify for at least one service type and at least one reporting configuration for the at least one service type (¶ [0096], see specifically service type), wherein the list of QoE measurement configurations a corresponding service type, and a corresponding measurement configuration (¶ [0010], see specifically configure application measurements), and transmit the first configuration to a communication device (¶ [0168], see specifically RRC connection reconfiguration); and receive a reporting message from the communication device, the reporting message comprising one or more QoE measurements collected in accordance with the first configuration (¶ [0168], see specifically the Measurement Report). Rune fails to explicitly teach wherein the list of QoE measurement configurations comprises a QoE configuration index, wherein the corresponding measurement configuration indicates a public land mobile network (PLMN) target, an application session to record, an area for measurement, a QoE destination, QoE metrics of the corresponding service type, or a combination thereof: Sakhnini fails to explicitly teach wherein the list of QoE measurement configurations comprises a QoE configuration index (¶ [0060], see specifically measurement index). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of telecommunications at the time of the filing of the invention to use an index in the case where multiple configurations are used in the system of Rune as taught by Sakhnini The motivation is that Rune teaches multiple configurations, an index is a well known tool to more easily differentiate between additional configurations. Hu from the same or similar field of endeavor teaches the corresponding measurement configuration indicates a public land mobile network (PLMN) target, an application session to record, an area for measurement , a QoE destination, QoE metrics of the corresponding service type, or a combination thereof (¶ [0377], see specifically area scope for the QoE measurement) Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of telecommunications at the time of the filing of the invention to use an area scope to determine an area for a QoE measurement in the system of Rune as taught by Hu. The motivation is that it allows the system to better control where the measurements are taken. Regarding Claims 4, 14, and 21, Rune teaches the at least one processor is configured to cause the base station to transmit, further comprising transmitting a second configuration to the communication device, second configuration comprising an indication to deactivate and release one or more QoE measurement configurations (¶ [0029], see specifically remove configurations.) Regarding Claims 5, 15 and 22, Rune teaches the indication to deactivate and release one or more QoE measurement configurations comprises a list of QoE measurement configurations to deactivate and release (¶ [0029], see specifically remove configurations.) Rune fails to explicitly teach each entry in the list of QoE measurement configurations comprises an QoE configuration index. Sakhnini from the same or similar field of endeavor teaches each entry in the list of QoE measurement configurations comprises an QoE configuration index (¶ [0060], see specifically measurement index). The motivation is that Rune teaches multiple configurations, an index is a well known tool to more easily differentiate between additional configurations. Regarding Claims 6, 16 and 23, Rune teaches the at least one processor is configured to cause the base station to transmit, further comprising transmitting a second configuration to the communication device, a second configuration comprising at least one indication to pause reporting of a particular QoE measurement configuration (¶ [0221], see specifically see specifically pause) Regarding Claims 7, 17 and 24, Rune teaches the at least one processor is configured to cause the base station to transmit, further comprising transmitting a third configuration to the communication device, a third configuration comprising at least one indication to resume reporting of the particular QoE measurement configuration (¶ [0219], see specifically resume) Regarding Claims 8 and 18, Rune teaches the reporting message comprises a plurality of QoE measurement reports (¶ [0237] – [0241], see specifically add to the QoE report) Regarding Claims 9 and 19, Rune teaches to transmit transmitting the first configuration to the communication device, the at least one processor is configured to cause the base station to transmit comprises transmitting ans a radio resource control (RRC) reconfiguration message to a User Equipment user equipment (UE) device (¶ [0168], see specifically RRC connection reconfiguration); Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks, filed May 26, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 4, 6-11, 14 and 16-20 under 35 USC 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Hu (US 2023/0156767) Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT M MORLAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5674. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10 AM - 4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hadi Armouche can be reached at 571-270-3618. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT M MORLAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2409 ROBERT M. MORLAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2409
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745194
IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF SERVICE OF CELL-EDGE USER EQUIPMENT WHEN SERVED BY A POWER LIMITED BASE STATION
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739888
COMMUNICATION METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739713
EARLY SYNCHRONIZATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727056
COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD AND USER EQUIPMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12707233
MANAGING POINT-TO-POINT AND POINT-TO-MULTIPOINT TRANSMISSION
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 495 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month