Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/548,220

ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 29, 2023
Examiner
GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nidec Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
871 granted / 1148 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1182
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1148 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 4-6, filed 09/26/2025, with respect to claims 1-5 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1-5 has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Inoue (US PG Pub 2018/0358848) and Osugi (JP 2018061319). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Inoue (US PG Pub 2018/0358848) in view of Kim (US PG Pub 2012/0139377) and Osugi (JP 2018061319). As to independent claim 1, Inoue teaches a rotary electric machine comprising: a rotor (40), the rotor (40) being rotatable; a stator (10) fixed around the rotor (40) and provided with a plurality of coils (15) in a stator core (13); and a motor housing (60) that accommodates the rotor (40) and the stator (10) therein, wherein the stator (10) is fixed to the motor housing (60) by a fastener (70) inserted into a plurality of fixing portions (13T) protruding radially outward from an outer peripheral edge of the stator core (13), and a flux barrier (13B) penetrating in an axial direction is formed near the fixing portion (13T) of the stator core (13) and at a position not overlapping the fixing portion (13T) in a radial direction as shown in figures 1, 5, 12. However Inoue teaches the claimed limitation as discussed above except a rotor in which a plurality of permanent magnets are embedded in an outer peripheral portion, wherein the flux barrier is completely radially inward with respect to the outer peripheral edge of the stator core. Kim teaches a rotor (20) in which a plurality of permanent magnets (10) are embedded in an outer peripheral portion as shown in figure 1, for the advantageous benefit of providing an interior permanent magnet motor and manufacturing method for the same which optimizes the arraying of permanent magnets and fixing strength. Osugi teaches the flux barrier (114a , 114b) is completely radially inward with respect to the outer peripheral edge of the stator core (112) as shown in figure 5, for the advantageous benefit of providing a simple structure to reduce eddy current loss by layer short of stator core. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Inoue by using a rotor in which a plurality of permanent magnets are embedded in an outer peripheral portion, wherein the flux barrier is completely radially inward with respect to the outer peripheral edge of the stator core, as taught by Kim ad Osugi, to provide an interior permanent magnet motor and manufacturing method for the same which optimizes the arraying of permanent magnets and fixing strength and provide a simple structure to reduce eddy current loss by layer short of stator core. As to claim 2/1, Inoue teaches wherein the fixing portion (13T) is disposed at an equiangular pitch in a circumferential direction of the stator (10), and the flux barriers (13B) are formed on both sides of the fixing portion (13T) in a circumferential direction as shown in figures 1 and 12. As to claim 3/1, Inoue teaches wherein the flux barrier (13B) is formed at a position not overlapping the fixing portion (13T) in a circumferential direction as shown in figures 1 and 12. As to claim 4/1, Inoue teaches wherein the fixing portion (13T) is a substantially triangular portion that bulges radially outward from an outer peripheral edge of the stator (10), and a through hole (13H) is provided through a center portion of the fixing portion (13T) as shown in figures 1 and 12 . As to claim 5/1, Inoue teaches wherein four of the fixing portions (13T) are formed at an equiangular pitch in a circumferential direction of the stator (10) as shown in figure 1. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE A GONZALEZ QUINONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7850. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:30-2:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, OLUSEYE IWARERE can be reached at (571)270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSE A GONZALEZ QUINONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834 October 10, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 26, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592595
ELECTRIC MOTOR WITH AXIAL AND RADIAL PERMANENT MAGNETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592601
MOTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587068
ELECTRIC MOTOR COOLING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583593
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OIL MAINTENANCE IN GEARBOXES FOR eVTOL AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580434
ROTOR FOR ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ROTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1148 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month