Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/548,661

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 01, 2023
Examiner
CHAN, WEI
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
418 granted / 565 resolved
+6.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
590
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
66.8%
+26.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 565 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/29/2024, 09/12/2023 and 09/01/2023. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. JP2021-038897, filed on 03/11/2021. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I (Claims 1-2, 17, 20-22 and 30) in the reply filed on 12/09/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that “Applicant hereby traverses the restriction requirement, at least on the grounds that examination of all of the identified inventions and all of the pending claims would not result in a serious search and/or examination burden.”. This is not found persuasive because the figures show mutually exclusive subject matter which would require search and consideration in several different subclasses with HO1Q and H10F each containing thousands of references. The prior art applicable to one invention (embodiment) would not likely be applicable to another invention (embodiment) which creates in a serious search and/or examination burden. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 17 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al [US 2021/0376453 A1] In regards to claims 1. Han discloses a semiconductor device (Fig. 4), comprising: a substrate (Fig. 4, 440); a millimeter wave (Paragraph [0004-5]) antenna (Fig. 4, 510) provided on the substrate (Fig. 4, 440); and an image sensor (Fig. 4, 491) provided on the substrate (Fig. 4, 440), PNG media_image1.png 692 460 media_image1.png Greyscale Han does not specify wherein an antenna surface of the millimeter wave antenna and a light receiving surface of the image sensor are disposed at spatially partitioned positions. Han discloses wherein an antenna surface of the millimeter wave antenna (Fig. 9b, 512) and a light receiving surface of the image sensor (Fig. 9b, 491) are disposed at spatially partitioned positions (Fig. 9b, S). PNG media_image2.png 451 581 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention was made modify Han with an antenna surface of the millimeter wave antenna and a light receiving surface of the image sensor are disposed at spatially partitioned positions for purpose of secures the first support frame and the support frame, and the first support frame may radiate the heat generating from the first antenna module through this heat transfer as disclosed by Han (Paragraph [0175]). In regards to claims 2. Van Zeijl discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the antenna surface (Fig. 4, 510) is disposed at a position further away from the substrate (Fig. 4, bottom of 440) than the image sensor (Fig. 4, 491) in a direction perpendicular to the substrate (Fig. 4, bottom of 440). In regards to claims 17. Van Zeijl discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein an analog or digital power supply (Fig. 4, 460) provided on the substrate (Fig. 4, 400) functions as a power supply for image sensor (Fig. 4, 491) and a power supply (Fig. 5, PMIC) for millimeter wave radar (Paragraph [0004-5]). In regards to claims 30. Van Zeijl discloses an electronic device (Fig. 1,100) including a semiconductor device (Fig. 4, 400), wherein the semiconductor device (Fig. 4, 400) comprises a substrate (Fig. 4, 440), a millimeter wave (Paragraph [0004-5]) antenna (Fig. 4, 510) provided on the substrate (Fig. 4, 440); and an image sensor (Fig. 4, 491) provided on the substrate (Fig. 4, 440), Han does not specify wherein an antenna surface of the millimeter wave antenna and a light receiving surface of the image sensor are disposed at spatially partitioned positions. Han discloses wherein an antenna surface of the millimeter wave antenna (Fig. 9b, 512) and a light receiving surface of the image sensor (Fig. 9b, 491) are disposed at spatially partitioned positions (Fig. 9b, S). PNG media_image2.png 451 581 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention was made modify Han with an antenna surface of the millimeter wave antenna and a light receiving surface of the image sensor are disposed at spatially partitioned positions for purpose of secures the first support frame and the support frame, and the first support frame may radiate the heat generating from the first antenna module through this heat transfer as disclosed by Han (Paragraph [0175]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 20-22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. “wherein a module that is provided with the millimeter wave antenna and generates an analog signal, and a bottom-raising substrate that is disposed between the substrate and the module and has a plurality of through holes formed therein are further comprised, and each of a plurality of the through holes is a through hole for transmission of an input signal to the module, for transmission of an output signal from the module, or for power supply.” as shown in claim 20. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WEI (VICTOR) CHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5177. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00am to 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at 571-270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WEI (VICTOR) CHAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2844 /WEI (VICTOR) Y CHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2844
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 01, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593380
TECHNIQUES FOR COLOR CONTROL IN DIMMABLE LIGHTING DEVICES AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589686
LIGHT DISTRIBUTION CONTROL DEVICE, VEHICULAR LAMP SYSTEM, AND LIGHT DISTRIBUTION CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586886
TERAHERTZ DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580294
WIRELESS MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573761
VERTICAL ANTENNA STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 565 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month