Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/548,746

ARTICLE WITH RANDOMIZED MOTION

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 09, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2021 — provisional 63/155,875 +1 more
Examiner
HAN, JASON
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Schnu LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
684 granted / 1002 resolved
At TC average
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
1013
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§102
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1002 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remark Pages 1-2, filed June 2, 2026, with respect to the 102 rejection of Schnuckle et al. (U.S. Patent 7,261,455 B2) and Applicant’s amendment to Claim 1 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims has been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed June 2, 2026 with respect to Claims 33-38 and the 102 rejection of Lee (U.S. Patent 9,133,992 B2) have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to Applicant’s argument, “In particular, Lee does not teach or suggest that any component of the lamp unit moves along a surface of the container body,” Lee remains commensurate in teaching an object (10, 12, 14, 16, 18-19) that moves along a surface [e.g., (24)] of the container body. Applicant argues that “it does not contact or travel along any surface”; however, it remains clear that the object [specifically, the part (18)] travels along the surface (24) within the container body. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 33-38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee (U.S. Patent 9,133,992 B2). With regards to Claim 33, Lee discloses an apparatus for generating randomized motion [Figures 1-6], including: An electromagnetic coil (36) for generating a magnetic field; An object (10, 12, 14, 16, 18-19) that is magnetically responsive to the magnetic field; A container (1, 6, 20) having a surface [e.g., (24)] and a boundary that confines movement of the object along the surface, wherein the magnetic response of the object to the magnetic field includes movement along the surface, and wherein the surface is configured to convey the movement of the object in multiple degrees of freedom [note Figures 1-4]. With regards to Claim 34, Lee discloses the surface defines a rest position for the object at which the object is restable in the absence of the magnetic field [note Figure 1]. With regards to Claim 35, Lee discloses the electromagnetic coil (36) includes a polar axis that is offset from the rest position [note Figure 1]. With regards to Claim 36, Lee discloses wherein the surface (24) is non-planar within the boundary [note Figure 1]. With regards to Claim 37, Lee discloses an article (12) that is magnetically responsive to one or more of the object and the magnetic field [via (19)]. With regards to Claim 38, Lee discloses the article (12) is secured to a housing [e.g., (22)] in an arrangement that permits a plurality of degrees of freedom of movement [note Figures 1-6]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8, 12, and 15 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: With regards to Independent Claim 1, the Applicant has sufficiently amended and claimed the article with randomized motion including the housing, the motion generator, the artificial flame assembly, and the light source. The prior art fails to teach or suggest the combination of structural and functional limitations claimed therein, specifically to the details and dispositions of the above elements relative to one another, and in particular to both the details of the object movable within the container and the response body movable by interacting with the object or the magnetic field, wherein the response body is configured to transfer motion to the artificial flame assembly so that the artificial flame assembly is movable with a plurality of degrees of freedom. The prior art to Schnuckle et al. (U.S. Patent 7,261,455 B2) discloses an article with randomized motion [Figures 1-22], including: A housing [(302, 304, 306, 320) or (302, 304, 306, 320, 322)]; A motion generator (316) capable of generating a magnetic field, a container (318) defining a boundary, and an object (330) movably responsive to the magnetic field, wherein the object is urged by the magnetic field to move through a space within the boundary [note Figures 7-22]; An article apparatus (324) coupled to the housing and including a response body (326) that is movable by interacting with the one or more of the object and the magnetic field, wherein the response body transfers motion to the article so that the article is movable with a plurality of degrees of freedom [Column 5, Line 32 – Column 6, Line 11]; and A light source (308) coupled to the housing and arranged to emit light in a beam that is intersectable with the article. As noted above, Schnuckle fails to teach or suggest the combination of structural and functional limitations claimed therein, specifically to both the details of the object movable within the container and the response body movable by interacting with the object or the magnetic field, wherein the response body is configured to transfer motion to the artificial flame assembly so that the artificial flame assembly is movable with a plurality of degrees of freedom. All subsequent claims are allowed due to dependency. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON M HAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2207. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdulmajeed Aziz can be reached at 571-270-5046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Thursday, July 9, 2026 /Jason M Han/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 09, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698873
IMPROVED THERMAL PERFORMANCE FOR SPOT LAMPS
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698872
LED LIGHTING DEVICE
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687285
INTEGRATED LIGHTING AND POWER FOR CABINETRY AND CONNECTORS FOR SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12668170
VEHICLE HAVING ROAD-SURFACE RENDERING FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668176
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE
1y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.9%)
2y 4m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1002 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month