Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/549,132

FUNCTIONALISED HYDROGELS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 05, 2023
Priority
Mar 05, 2021 — AU 2021900632 +1 more
Examiner
IQBAL, SYED TAHA
Art Unit
1736
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
680 granted / 850 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
870
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 09/16/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 10-13, 18, 19, 38, 43, 80 and 81 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sahiner et al. “PEI-based hydrogels with different morphology and sizes: Bulkgel, microgel, and cryogel…” Regarding claims 1, 10-13, 18, 19 and 43, Sahiner teaches a crosslinked PEI hydrogel (See Pg. 159, last para). The reference teaches the following structure in Fig. 1: [AltContent: textbox ([img-media_image1.png])] The reference shows polyamines where an amine group has been substituted or replaced with a hydroxyethyl group. The reference shows the combination of the polyamine with a functionalizing epoxide (See Fig. 1 on Pg. 160). Glycerol is taught as the crosslinking agent (Pg. 158, first para). Water is considered as the liquid swelling agent. Alternatively the glycerol is considered as the swelling agent since it provides the cross linking ability which allows the hydrogel to swell. The functional group R1 and R2 are considered to be hydrogen. Additionally, any of the CH2-CH2-OH groups will read on the claimed limitation as the substitution for a previously present amine group. Regarding claim 38, the ability for the glycerol to swell to a capacity in the range of 1-200 g/g of liquid swelling agent is considered intrinsic to the glycerol. The instant invention describes the swelling agent to be any one or more of alcohols, polyols and amines (See Instant Spec Pg. 17, lines 22-26). This includes glycerol which is disclosed by the Sahiner reference (See Pg. 158, first para). The swelling capacity would be expected to be within the broad range claimed because the swelling agent is described to include a compound such as glycerol. Regarding claims 80 and 81, the Sahiner reference teaches particulate microgel and film shaped cryogel (See Fig. 1, (c) and (d)). Allowable Subject Matter In view of Applicant’s IDS submission of 09/16/2026, the notice of allowability of 08/12/2026 has been withdrawn. Claim 82 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 82 requires “The hydrogel of claim 1, wherein the one or more amine groups is substituted with 2-hydroxybutane.” Sahiner et al. does not teach or suggest “… the one or more amine groups is substituted with 2-hydroxybutane”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SYED TAHA IQBAL whose telephone number is (571)270-5857. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 7-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Zimmer can be reached at (571) 270-3591. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SYED T IQBAL/Examiner, Art Unit 1736 /ANTHONY J ZIMMER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767549
UNIVERSAL PREPARATION METHOD FOR IN-SITU GROWTH OF LAYERED DOUBLE HYDROXIDE (LDH) LAYER ON SUBSTRATE SURFACE
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767899
USE OF TRANSITION METAL DOPED NANOPARTICLES AND SILICA NANOPARTICLES FOR H2S REMOVAL
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759891
OXIDATIVE ROASTING OF BLACK DROSS AND SALT CAKE
4y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760390
PURIFICATION OF SCANDIUM CONCENTRATE
4y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759893
Recovery Of Chlorine From Hydrogen Chloride Generated In Carbochlorination Processes
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.3%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month