Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/549,220

ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR THE LONGITUDINAL ADJUSTMENT OF A VEHICLE SEAT AND ANCILLARY LOCKING DEVICE FOR THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 06, 2023
Priority
Mar 15, 2021 — DE 10 2021 106 279.9 +1 more
Examiner
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft Coburg
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
989 granted / 1234 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1252
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
39.4%
-0.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1234 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 12 and 19-20 as best understood is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Couasnon (5,772,173). Couasnon shows the use of an ancillary locking device (14,25,41-44) for an adjustment device for adjustment of the position of a vehicle seat in a longitudinal direction, comprising: at least one pair of rails (1,2) comprising a first, fixed rail (2) and a second rail (1) movably guided in the longitudinal direction (Figs. 1-2) relative to the first rail; wherein the ancillary locking device comprises a plurality of first (48) and third locking structures (25) arranged on a first side of the pair of rails and plurality of second (25) and fourth (48) locking structures arranged a second side of one of the pair of rails (Fig. 3). The first and second locking structures are offset from one another in the longitudinal direction (as shown in Fig. 2 as the notches don’t have to be aligned with teeth until the rail is moved into position). Regarding claim 19, Couasnon shows that the first and second locking structures or the third and fourth locking structures are each arranged spaced apart from each other in the longitudinal direction by a predetermined increment (Figs. 1-2). Regarding claim 20 the integer fraction is inherently n=2 as a result of the fact distance between the plurality of first locking structures (48) are K*p +p/2, as the p is the pitch of the second locking structures. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8, 10-11, and 13-18 are allowed over the prior art made of record. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 12 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D BARFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D BARFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 adb June 27, 2027
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703275
SIDE PROTECTION MECHANISM FOR SAFETY SEAT AND SAFETY SEAT WITH SIDE PROTECTION MECHANISM
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12690687
Folding Chair with Structural Enhancements for Increased Load Bearing
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690681
MOVABLE SEATING DEVICE AND MECHANICAL EXTENSION DEVICE THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686357
OCCUPANT SAFETY RESTRAINT SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686302
CHILD SAFETY SEAT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1234 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month