Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/549,220

ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR THE LONGITUDINAL ADJUSTMENT OF A VEHICLE SEAT AND ANCILLARY LOCKING DEVICE FOR THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 06, 2023
Examiner
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft Coburg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
975 granted / 1218 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1241
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§102
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 7, the phrase “the associated bottom rail” lacks antecedent basis and claim 9, the phrases “the bottom rail” and “upper rail” have no antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 as best understood is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Goy et al (EP 1188603A1). Goy et al. shows the use of an adjustment device (304,305,404,405) for adjustment of the position of a vehicle seat (1) in a longitudinal direction, comprising: at least one pair of rails (304,305,404,405) comprising a first, fixed rail (305,405) and a second rail (304,404) movably guided in the longitudinal direction (x) relative to the first rail; and an ancillary locking device (311,411); wherein the ancillary locking device comprises a plurality of first locking structures (324, 426) formed on or connected to the second rail and a plurality of second locking structures (325,427) formed corresponding to the first locking structures and formed on or connected to the first rail, and the ancillary locking device is not active in a normal mode and, after introduction of forces in the event of a crash, causes an additional locking of the second rail to the first rail by positively locking of the first and second locking structures to one another, characterized in that the first and second locking structures are arranged on both sides of the respective pair of rails (as shown in Fig. 2) and at regular distances from each other in the longitudinal direction (x), wherein the first locking structures or the second locking structures are arranged offset with respect to one other in the longitudinal direction (Figs. 7-8) on the two sides of the respective pair of rails. Regarding claims 2, 13 and 19, Goy et al., shows that the first locking structures or the second locking structures are each arranged spaced apart from each other in the longitudinal direction by a predetermined increment (Figs. 7-8) on the two sides of the respective pair of rails, and the first locking structures or the second locking structures are each arranged offset from each other in the longitudinal direction by an integer fraction n of the predetermined increment on the two sides of the respective pair of rails (see Figs. 7-8). Regarding claims 3,14 and 20 the integer fraction is inherently n=2 as a result of the fact there are twice as many locking structures arranged along the longitudinal direction in regards to the fixed rail that are offset from the locking structures being spaced along the longitudinal direction of the second movable rail. Regarding claims 4-6, and 15-17, the first locking structures on the two sides of the respective pair of rails each form a toothing (Figs. 7-8) comprising a plurality of locking teeth and a plurality of tooth gaps arranged between the locking teeth and wherein the second locking structures each form, on the two sides of the respective pair of rails, a toothing (324) comprising a plurality of locking teeth and a plurality of tooth gaps arranged between the locking teeth, or a hole pattern (325) comprising a plurality of recesses (Figs. 7), a plurality of intermediate webs separating the recesses, and a connecting web connecting the intermediate webs. The lengths of the recesses of the respective hole pattern in the longitudinal direction are greater than the lengths of (tips of) the associated locking teeth of the respective toothing (Fig. 7). Regarding claims 7-8, the hole wherein the hole pattern (325) is inherently formed respectively at the front end of lateral legs, which are formed on both sides and corresponding to a profile of connecting legs (as shown in Figs. 4-5) of “the associated bottom rail” (305) (which is the same rails as the other embodiments) and is connected to the second rail by a connecting plate as a result of the locking device (311). Regarding claim 9, the first locking structures or the second locking structures are formed on both sides of an embracing section (the sidewall) of the bottom rail with the associated upper rail (Figs. 7-8). Regarding claim 10, the ancillary locking device is connected to a belt adapter (312, 412) of a safety belt system whereby the first locking structure is connected thereto (as shown in Figs 7-8). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Reference Nos. 4,787,667, AU 595611B2 and DE 202004003359U1 show features of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D BARFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D BARFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 adb November 15, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600480
VEHICLE PASSENGER SEAT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594860
VEHICLE SEAT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594859
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593921
SEAT SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593918
CROSS-ELASTIC DIRECTOR'S CHAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month