Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/549,755

CONFIGURATION FOR ASYMMETRIC QUALITY OF SERVICE (QOS) FLOWS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 08, 2023
Priority
Jun 04, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCT/CN2021/098327 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, CHONG G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
371 granted / 444 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
476
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 444 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The office action is non-final due to a new ground of rejection in response to Applicant’s arguments filed on 6/8/2026. Response to Amendment The Amendment filed on 6/8/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-6, 9, 10, 12-17, 20, 21 and 23-30 remain pending in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments on pages 10-12 with respect to claims 1, 12, 23 and 28 have been considered but are moot upon a further consideration and a new ground of rejection made under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang-Fu (US PGPub 2020/0275305) in view of Xu (US PGPub 2024/0056889). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6, 9, 10, 12-17, 20, 21 and 23-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang-Fu (US PGPub 2020/0275305) in view of Xu (US PGPub 2024/0056889). Regarding claims 1 and 23, Huang-Fu teaches an apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE) (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0042, a UE-requested PDU session establishment process for establishing a PDU session), comprising: at least one processor; at least one memory coupled with the at least one processor; and instructions stored in the at least one memory and executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus (Huang-Fu, see figure 1, UE 110) to: establish a connection with a network entity, wherein the connection corresponds to a quality of service flow for communications between the UE and the network entity (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0042-0043, a UE-requested PDU session establishment process for establishing a PDU session. The PDU session 101 can include one or more quality of service (QoS) flows 210-220 each having a QoS flow identifier (QFI), and be associated with one or more QoS rules and a QoS flow description); receive control signaling comprising a configuration for the quality of service flow in response to establishing the connection (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0078, the session 101 has been established between the UE 110 and the DN 140. The PDU session modification process 400 can be initiated, and the PDU session modification command message 411 can be transmitted from SMF 132 to the UE 110), wherein the configuration comprises a set of one or more parameters specific to a direction of the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0079, the QoS rule parameter 1002 can indicate an rule operation 1003 of “modify existing QoS rule”. Based on the rule operation 1003, the QoS rule 1010 can be modified to generate a QoS rule 1020), wherein one or more values of the set of one or more parameters indicate a guaranteed flow bit rate of zero, a maximum flow bit rate of zero, or both for one of an uplink direction or a downlink direction to indicate that the quality of service flow is unidirectional (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0079, a QoS rule of a GBR QoS flow can have a corresponding QoS flow description providing sufficient parameters (e.g., 5QI, GFBR UL, GFBR DL, MFBR UL, MFBR DL, or the like) for defining the respective GBR QoS flow. The parameters 5QI, GFBR UL, GFBR DL, MFBR UL, and MFBR DL, can be referred to as QoS flow description (QFD) parameters); and communicate data in the direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the set of one or more parameters (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0043, The PDU session 101 can include one or more quality of service (QoS) flows 210-220 each having a QoS flow identifier (QFI), and be associated with one or more QoS rules and a QoS flow description). Huang-Fu teaches the above yet fails to teach wherein the set of one or more parameters indicates a maximum data burst volume associated with the quality of service flow. Then Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters indicates a maximum data burst volume associated with the quality of service flow (Xu, see paragraph 0033, the access-network-side device sends third information to a control plane of a core network system, where the third information indicates at least one of the following reference information determined by the access-network-side device. A reference maximum data burst volume that the access-network-side device can bear for the downlink data burst within a packet delay budget of the air interface, and the downlink data burst includes at least one data packet that belongs to a same quality of service QoS flow of a same service). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Huang-Fu with Communication processing method for data transmission and related device of Xu, because doing so would make Huang-Fu more efficient in improving a load balancing capability of a wireless communication system (Xu, see paragraph 0005). Regarding claims 2 and 24, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters comprises a flow direction parameter configured to indicate the direction of the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claims 3 and 25, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters comprises a quality of service identifier for the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0007, a QoS flow identifier (QFI) in the QoS flow description), and the direction of the quality of service flow is based at least in part on a mapping between the quality of service identifier and a quality of service flow characteristic configured to indicate the direction (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0045, A 5QI can be used as an index to determine a set of QoS parameters (referred to as 5G QoS characteristics) in a mapping table providing a mapping between 5QI values and respective QoS characteristics). Regarding claims 4 and 26, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the instructions to receive the control signaling are executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to: receive the control signaling based at least in part on establishing the connection with the network entity, an establishment of the quality of service flow, a modification of the quality of service flow, or any combination thereof (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0042, The 5GSM procedures can include a UE-requested PDU session establishment process for establishing a PDU session, a network-initiated PDU session modification process (may be requested by a UE), and a network-initiated PDU session release process (may be requested by a UE)). Regarding claims 5 and 27, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters comprise a first guaranteed flow bit rate, a first maximum flow bit rate, or both specific to the uplink direction in the quality of service flow, and a second guaranteed flow bit rate, a second maximum flow bit rate, or both specific to the downlink direction in the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL), and wherein the instructions to communicate the data are executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to: transmit uplink data in the uplink direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the first guaranteed flow bit rate, the first maximum flow bit rate, or both, wherein the second guaranteed flow bit rate is the guaranteed flow bit rate of zero, the second maximum flow bit rate is the maximum flow bit rate of zero, or both (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL); or receive downlink data in the downlink direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the second guaranteed flow bit rate, the second maximum flow bit rate, or both, wherein the first guaranteed flow bit rate is the guaranteed flow bit rate of zero, the first maximum flow bit rate is the maximum flow bit rate of zero, or both (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claim 6, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein: the maximum data burst volume corresponds to a bandwidth assumption for the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL); and the first guaranteed flow bit rate, the first maximum flow bit rate, the second guaranteed flow bit rate, the second maximum flow bit rate, or any combination thereof override the bandwidth assumption (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claim 9, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters indicates the direction of the quality of service flow is the uplink direction (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL), and wherein the instructions to communicate the data are executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to: transmit uplink data in the uplink direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the set of one or more parameters (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claim 10, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters indicates the direction of the quality of service flow is the downlink direction (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL), and wherein the instructions to communicate the data are executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to: receive downlink data in the downlink direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the set of one or more parameters (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claims 12 and 28, Huang-Fu teaches an apparatus for wireless communication at a network entity (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0042, The 5GSM procedures can include … a network-initiated PDU session modification process (may be requested by a UE)), comprising: at least one processor; at least one memory coupled with the at least one processor; and instructions stored in the at least one memory and executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus (Huang-Fu, see figure 1, AN 120) to: establish a connection with a user equipment (UE), wherein the connection corresponds to a quality of service flow for communications between the network entity and the UE (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0042-0043, a UE-requested PDU session establishment process for establishing a PDU session. The PDU session 101 can include one or more quality of service (QoS) flows 210-220 each having a QoS flow identifier (QFI), and be associated with one or more QoS rules and a QoS flow description); transmit, to the UE, control signaling comprising a configuration for the quality of service flow in response to establishing the connection (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0078, the session 101 has been established between the UE 110 and the DN 140. The PDU session modification process 400 can be initiated, and the PDU session modification command message 411 can be transmitted from SMF 132 to the UE 110), wherein the configuration comprises a set of one or more parameters specific to a direction of the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0079, the QoS rule parameter 1002 can indicate an rule operation 1003 of “modify existing QoS rule”. Based on the rule operation 1003, the QoS rule 1010 can be modified to generate a QoS rule 1020), wherein one or more values of the set of one or more parameters indicate a guaranteed flow bit rate of zero, a maximum flow bit rate of zero, or both for one of an uplink direction or a downlink direction to indicate that the quality of service flow is unidirectional (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0079, a QoS rule of a GBR QoS flow can have a corresponding QoS flow description providing sufficient parameters (e.g., 5QI, GFBR UL, GFBR DL, MFBR UL, MFBR DL, or the like) for defining the respective GBR QoS flow. The parameters 5QI, GFBR UL, GFBR DL, MFBR UL, and MFBR DL, can be referred to as QoS flow description (QFD) parameters); and communicate data in the direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the set of one or more parameters (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0043, The PDU session 101 can include one or more quality of service (QoS) flows 210-220 each having a QoS flow identifier (QFI), and be associated with one or more QoS rules and a QoS flow description). Huang-Fu teaches the above yet fails to teach wherein the set of one or more parameters indicates a maximum data burst volume associated with the quality of service flow. Then Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters indicates a maximum data burst volume associated with the quality of service flow (Xu, see paragraph 0033, the access-network-side device sends third information to a control plane of a core network system, where the third information indicates at least one of the following reference information determined by the access-network-side device. A reference maximum data burst volume that the access-network-side device can bear for the downlink data burst within a packet delay budget of the air interface, and the downlink data burst includes at least one data packet that belongs to a same quality of service QoS flow of a same service). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Huang-Fu with Communication processing method for data transmission and related device of Xu, because doing so would make Huang-Fu more efficient in improving a load balancing capability of a wireless communication system (Xu, see paragraph 0005). Regarding claims 13 and 29, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters comprises a flow direction parameter configured to indicate the direction of the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claims 14 and 30, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters comprises a quality of service identifier for the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0007, a QoS flow identifier (QFI) in the QoS flow description), and wherein the direction of the quality of service flow is based at least in part on a mapping between the quality of service identifier and a quality of service flow characteristic configured to indicate the direction (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0045, A 5QI can be used as an index to determine a set of QoS parameters (referred to as 5G QoS characteristics) in a mapping table providing a mapping between 5QI values and respective QoS characteristics). Regarding claim 15, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the instructions to transmit the control signaling are executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to: transmit the control signaling based at least in part on establishing the connection with the UE, an establishment of the quality of service flow, a modification of the quality of service flow, or any combination thereof (Huang-Fu, see paragraph 0042, The 5GSM procedures can include a UE-requested PDU session establishment process for establishing a PDU session, a network-initiated PDU session modification process (may be requested by a UE), and a network-initiated PDU session release process (may be requested by a UE)). Regarding claim 16, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters comprises a first guaranteed flow bit rate, a first maximum flow bit rate, or both specific to the uplink direction in the quality of service flow, and a second guaranteed flow bit rate, a second maximum flow bit rate, or both specific to the downlink direction in the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL), and wherein the instructions to communicate the data are executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to: receive uplink data in the uplink direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the first guaranteed flow bit rate, the first maximum flow bit rate, or both, wherein the first guaranteed flow bit rate is the guaranteed flow bit rate of zero, the first maximum flow bit rate is the maximum flow bit rate of zero, or both (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL); or transmit downlink data in the downlink direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the second guaranteed flow bit rate, the second maximum flow bit rate, or both, wherein the first guaranteed flow bit rate is the guaranteed flow bit rate of zero, the first maximum flow bit rate is the maximum flow bit rate of zero, or both (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claim 17, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein: the maximum data burst volume corresponds to a bandwidth assumption for the quality of service flow (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL); and the first guaranteed flow bit rate, the first maximum flow bit rate, the second guaranteed flow bit rate, the second maximum flow bit rate, or any combination thereof override the bandwidth assumption (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claim 20, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters indicates the direction of the quality of service flow is the uplink direction (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL), and wherein the instructions to communicate the data are executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to: receive uplink data in the uplink direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the set of one or more parameters (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Regarding claim 21, Huang-Fu in view of Xu teaches wherein the set of one or more parameters indicates the direction of the quality of service flow is the downlink direction (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL), and wherein the instructions to communicate the data are executable by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to: transmit downlink data in the downlink direction of the quality of service flow in accordance with the set of one or more parameters (Huang-Fu, see paragraphs 0048-0053, each QoS flow description of the PDU session 101, if the QoS flow is a GBR QoS flow, may further include the following parameters: 1) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for UL; 2) Guaranteed flow bit rate (GFBR) for DL; 3) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for UL; 4) Maximum flow bit rate (MFBR) for DL; and 5) optionally averaging window, applicable for both UL and DL). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG G KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0619. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri @ 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R. Taylor can be reached at 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG G KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2443 /NICHOLAS R TAYLOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Nov 06, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 08, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707301
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING A MOBILE NETWORK EXPERIENCE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701634
IN-VEHICLE CONTROL OF WIRELESS CONNECTION DENSITY
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696326
Frequency Hopping Scheme For Improved Operation In Congested Environments
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695670
METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO DETERMINE AND MONITOR TOPOLOGIES OF 5G SERVICE-BASED ARCHITECTURES
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683912
MULTI-USER FLEXIBLE ETHERNET FINE GRANULARITY TIME SLOT ALLOCATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.5%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 444 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month