Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/549,916

NASAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING ALCAFTADINE

Non-Final OA §102§103§DP
Filed
Sep 10, 2023
Examiner
HENLEY III, RAYMOND J
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Alkem Laboratories Limited
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1041 granted / 1248 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1279
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§102
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§112
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1248 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §DP
CLAIMS 1-16 AND 19-23 ARE PRESENTED FOR EXAMINATION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, has been examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s response/amendment filed October 24, 2025 has been received and entered into the application. Accordingly, the application papers have been amended as directed. Also, the double patenting rejection as set forth in the previous Office action dated October 24, 2025 has been overcome and is hereby withdrawn. Claim Rejection - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6-8, 10, 11 and 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Parasrampuria et al., (US 2008/0051385 A1, “Parasrampuria”, cited by the Examiner). Parasrampuria teach pharmaceutically acceptable alcaftadine-containing, (e.g., [0015]), nasal compositions, e.g., drops, suspension and gels, ([0019]), and methods for administering such compositions for the treatment of nasal symptoms of ocular allergies including nasal inflammation, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal pruitis and sneezing, ([0018], where the composition is administered to the patient’s nostrils in the form of such nasal compositions, ([0019]). The nasal compositions may contain various additives such as buffering agents, including a phosphate buffer, ([0023]), isotonizing agents, solubilizers, preservatives, viscosity-increasing agents, chelating agents, antioxidizing agents and pH regulators, (end of [0021]). Examples of such viscosity-increasing agents are methylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, chondroitin sulfate and salts thereof, ([0022]). The alcaftadine may be present in a concentration range of from about 0.005% by weight to about 10% by weight, with from about 0.1% to about 0.35% being preferred, ([0026]). A preferred pH range of the composition is taught to be from about 6.5 to about 7.5, ([0023[). In a representative compositions shown in Table 1 at [0050], sodium chloride concentrations, (i.e., isotonicity agent), were 2.4, 2.3 and 2.1 mg/ml. In all three compositions, the preservative benzalkonium chloride was present at concentration of 0.2 mg/ml. and the chelator disodium edetate was present at a concentration of 1.1 mg/ml. Accordingly, for the above reasons, the claims 1-4, 6-8, 10, 11 and 19-23 are deemed properly rejected. Claim Rejection - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-16 and 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Parasrampuria, cited above, for the reasons set forth above as applied to claims 1-4, 6-8, 10, 11 and 19-23, which reasons are here incorporated by reference. The difference between the above and the claimed subject matter lies in that the particular viscosity values of present claims 5 and 12-16 are not taught and sodium monobasic phosphate is not taught as the buffering agent. However, the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains because phosphate buffers in general are taught as is the present of viscosity-enhancing agents. The determination of the optimum phosphate buffer to employ as well as the particular viscosity, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, would have a been a matter within the purview of an ordinarily skill artisan and well within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed as a whole by Parasrampuria. None of the present claims are currently in condition for allowance. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND J HENLEY III whose telephone number is (571)272-0575. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6-2:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey S Lundgren can be reached at 571-272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND J HENLEY III/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1629 January 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §DP
Oct 24, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599604
APPLICATION OF JAK INHIBITOR IN KIDNEY DISEASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594278
METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595269
BRIDGED RING COMPOUNDS AND THEIR THERAPEUTIC USE AS CNS AGENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589097
APILIMOD COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582631
METHODS OF IMPROVING RENAL FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+2.1%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1248 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month