Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/549,958

RESIN PARTICLES, TONER, METHOD FOR PRODUCING RESIN PARTICLES, METHOD FOR PRODUCING TONER, DEVELOPER, TONER STORAGE UNIT, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 11, 2023
Priority
Mar 24, 2021 — JP 2021-049691 +2 more
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
25 granted / 32 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
89.7%
+49.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 32 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-8 and 12-14 in the reply filed on 3/30/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hama (US PGP 2016/0363878) in view of Moroiwa (EP 2578611). Hama teaches a toner comprising a toner particle comprising an amorphous polyester resin, a crystalline polyester resin, and a wax, wherein the crystalline polyester resin occupies domains with an aspect ratio of 5.0 to 25.0 (Abstract). The toner further comprises a colorant ([0072]) and an external additive ([0101]). The average major axis of the domains (Dc) is from 0.8 to 2.0 times the average diameter of the wax domains (Dw) ([0019]). Since Dw is from 60 nm to 240 nm ([0018]), Dc is therefore 48 nm to 480 nm. The crystalline resin comprises a diol having 4 to 12 carbon atoms ([0088]) and a dicarboxylic acid having 6 to 14 carbon atoms ([0092]). Particularly preferable diols include ethylene glycol and 1,6-hexane diol ([0088] line 9-12). The amorphous resin comprises an alcohol component and an acid component ([0038]). The acid component may include succinic acid or sebacic acid, wherein succinic acid is a preferred compound ([0044]). The wax may preferably be carnauba wax, a vegetable wax ([0069]). Hama teaches that the toner may be used with a carrier to form a developer ([0107]). Hama is silent regarding the dicarboxylic acid component of the crystalline resin being plant-derived, or a 14C concentration of the toner. Moroiwa teaches a toner with a polyester resin comprising raw materials from biomass resources in order to reduce the effects on the environmental load ([0014],[0020-22]). Carboxylic acids for polyester resin can be produced from raw materials of plants, such as succinic acid and sebacic acid ([0071] [0090] [0102]). It is preferable to use these materials derived from plants from the viewpoint of the environmental load and carbon neutrality ([0088]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the toner of Hama to have included the carboxylic acids that are derived from plant material of Moroiwa in order to produce a toner that is more environmentally friendly. When the carboxylic acids in the polyester resins of Hama are replaced with the plant-derived components of Moroiwa, a carbon radioisotope 14C concentration of 40.0 pMC could be easily achieved. Additionally, the plant-derived carnauba wax would also contribute to the 14C concentration. It would be desirable to produce a toner with 14C concentration higher than 40.0 pMC, as the environmental load would be reduced more as more of the typical petroleum-based components are replaced with the plant-derived counterparts. Claims 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hama and Moroiwa as applied to claims 1-8 and 12 above, and further in view of Matsui (US PGP 2018/0004106). The entire discussion of Hama and Moroiwa above are included herein. Hama teaches that the toner is for use in electrophotographic systems ([0002]), but is silent regarding an image forming apparatus for use with the toner. Matsui teaches an image forming apparatus (Figures 1 and 2, [0207-209]) comprising an electrostatic latent image bearer 45, an electrostatic latent image forming unit (laser-generating apparatus) 54, and a developing unit 49. The toner is housed in a toner cartridge ([0142]). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used the image forming apparatus of Matsui with the modified toner of Hama and Moroiwa as an image forming apparatus is well known in the art as how a toner is used in an electrophotographic system. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./ Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 05/12/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2023
Application Filed
May 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681403
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675060
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669760
SILICA PARTICLE, TONER FOR DEVELOPING ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12645164
TONER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12631982
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 32 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month