Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/550,678

IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR FRAUD DETECTION

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Sep 14, 2023
Examiner
WASHINGTON, JAMARES
Art Unit
2681
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Rakuten Group Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
545 granted / 671 resolved
+19.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§103
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 671 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Amendments and response received 11/21/2025 have been entered. Claims 1 and 4-15 are currently pending in this application. Claims 1, and 4-8 have been amended and claims 2, 3, 16 and 17 canceled. Amendments and response are addressed hereinbelow. Specification In light of the amendment to the title of the invention the examiner hereby withdraws the previous grounds of objection as the new title is more indicative of the invention as claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1 and 4-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to a judicial exception (i.e., a law of nature, a natural phenomenon, or an abstract idea) without significantly more. The claims recite acquiring a target image showing a target foreground and background, acquiring a reference image showing a reference background, and estimating fraud relating to the target foreground based on the target background and the reference background without significantly more. Further, the invention discloses acquiring a first and second score related to the fraud and estimating fraud based on the first and second scores using different evaluation methods for obtaining the scores. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because there is no meaningful limitations beyond generally linking the use of an abstract idea to a particular technical environment. Furthermore, the process or method steps performed are not enough to qualify as “significantly more” than the abstract idea itself as the steps may be performed in the human mind as a human visually determine similarities between an acquired image and stored reference images to make a determination. Furthermore, determinations can be made by human activity with evaluation parameters including patterns and colors as both evaluation parameters can be used in visually distinguishing or likening images. The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the additional elements when considered both individually and as an ordered combination do not amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. The claims recite an image processing system comprising at least one processor and a user terminal to display a guide to causing the target background to be shown in the target image. The aforementioned additional elements amount to merely using generic computer components to display an image to a user while the user makes desired determinations. Generic computer components recited as performing generic functions that are well-understood, routine and conventional amount to no more than implementing the abstract idea with a computerized system. Thus, taken alone, the additional elements do not amount to significantly more than the above-identified abstract idea. There is no indication that the elements improve the functioning of a computer or improves any other technology. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Identity Document and Banknote Security Forensics: A Survey (Albert B. Centeno et al; Oct. 22 2019) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMARES Q WASHINGTON whose telephone number is (571) 270-1585. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Akwasi M. Sarpong can be reached at (571) 270-3438. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMARES Q WASHINGTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2681 January 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 14, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Nov 21, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Mar 24, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602832
SIGNAL PROCESSING DEVICE, CONTROL CIRCUIT, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602937
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND INTERFACES FOR IDENTIFYING COATING SURFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602741
SYSTEMS AND METHODS REGULATING FILTER STRENGTH FOR TEMPORAL FILTERING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603966
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM CAPABLE OF SUPPRESSING IMAGE DEGRADATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12561779
PREDICTING RAILROAD BALLAST FOULING CONDITIONS BASED ON BALLAST IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 671 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month