Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/551,365

A CASING AND A METHOD FOR ENCAPSULATION USING INJECTION MOULDING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 19, 2023
Priority
Mar 19, 2021 — FI 20215308 +1 more
Examiner
LOPEZ CRUZ, DIMARY S
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Efla OY
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
19%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
346 granted / 475 resolved
+4.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -54% lift
Without
With
+-53.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
485
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 475 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed June 11, 2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iwasaki (JP 2013181608A; hereinafter Iwasaki), Shaw et al. (US 6,838,617; hereinafter Shaw) and Showcatally et al. (US 9,635,775; hereinafter Showcatally). Regarding claim 1, Iwasaki discloses a method for encapsulation (fig. 1), the method comprising: forming a casing (10) by connecting at least a first casing component (11) and a second casing component (12), wherein at least one of the first casing component (11) or the second casing component (12) is shaped to provide a sealing groove (11c and 12c) along a seam of the first casing component (11) and the second casing component (12); hermetically sealing the seam between the first casing component (11) and the second casing (12) component by filling the sealing groove by injection moulding, wherein the materials of the first casing component and the second casing component and the material used for the injection moulding have adhesion properties with each other (see [0019]: “In addition, a recessed side 11b and a side 12b are formed on the periphery (outer periphery in this embodiment) of the mutually abutting peripheral side 11c and side 12c of the first and second molded products 11 and 12, and a sealing molding material 13 made of a sealing plastic is supplied between the recessed side 11c and the side 12c by injection-molding or the like. Then, a contact portion between the sealing molding material 13 and the first molded article 11 and a contact portion between the sealing molding material 13 and the second molded article 12 are melted and joined by heat generated when the melted sealing molding material 13 is sealed, thereby hermetically sealing the hollow sealing structure 10 including the first and second molded articles 11 and 12.”); and wherein dimensions of the sealing groove and temperature of the material used for the injection moulding are determined based on dimensions of the casing and the used materials of the first casing component and the second casing component such that the sealing groove is filled with a sufficient amount of the material used for injection moulding to cover the seam (see [0022]: “In this manner, in a state in which the integrated portion 11d and the integrated portion 12d are fitted to each other and the first molded article 11 and the second molded article 12 are integrated with each other, a sealing molding material 13 made of a sealing plastic is supplied and sealed between the recessed portion 11c and the recessed portion 12c of the first and second molded articles 11 and 12 by injection-molding or the like.”) and such that enough heat is provided by the injection moulding to melt the injection moulded seam with the first and the second casing component (see [0019]: “Then, a contact portion between the sealing molding material 13 and the first molded article 11 and a contact portion between the sealing molding material 13 and the second molded article 12 are melted and joined by heat generated when the melted sealing molding material 13 is sealed, thereby hermetically sealing the hollow sealing structure 10 including the first and second molded articles 11 and 12.”). Iwasaki does not specifically disclose materials of the first casing component and the second casing component, and a material used for injection moulding comprise an elastomer; and enough heat is provided by the injection moulding to cause the first and the second casing component to melt together at the seam. Shaw teaches a method for encapsulation (fig. 5) wherein materials of a first casing component (11) and a second casing component (12) and a material used for sealing (74) are the same materials; and enough heat is provided to cause the first (11) and the second (12) casing component to melt together at the seam (see col. 7 lines 50-66). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Shaw and make Iwasaki’s method for encapsulation with the first casing component and the second casing component, and a material used for injection moulding comprise the same material; and enough heat is provided by the injection moulding, in order to create a permanent sealing between the components. The modified Iwasaki does not specifically disclose materials for the first casing component and the second casing component and a material used for injection moulding comprise an elastomer. Showcatally teaches a method for encapsulation (Fig. 1) wherein materials for a first casing component (102) and the second casing component (104) and a material used for sealing comprise an elastomer (col. 2 lines 31-40). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Showcatally and make the modified Iwasaki’s method for encapsulation with materials for the first casing component and the second casing component and a material used for injection moulding comprising an elastomer, in order to use a material with a low melting point, capable of flowing under heat that will guarantee a sealing connection at the sealing surfaces. Regarding claim 3, Iwasaki discloses the method of claim 1. Iwasaki does not specifically disclose wherein the first casing component, the second casing component and the injection moulding comprise a same material. However, Shaw teaches the method for encapsulation (fig. 5) wherein materials of a first casing component (11) and a second casing component (12) and a material used for sealing (74) are the same materials. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Shaw and make Iwasaki’s method for encapsulation with the first casing component and the second casing component, and a material used for injection moulding comprise the same material; and enough heat is provided by the injection moulding, in order to hermetically seal the inside of the casing. Regarding claim 4, Iwasaki discloses the method of claim 1. Iwasaki does not specifically disclose wherein at least one of the first or the second casing component comprises a different material than the injection moulding and wherein the materials have good adhesion to each other. However, Showcatally teaches the method wherein at least one of the first or the second casing component (11 and 12) comprise comprises a different material than the sealing (74) and wherein the materials have good adhesion to each other (col. 7, lines 64-66). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Shaw and make Iwasaki’s method for encapsulation with at least one of the first or the second casing component comprise comprises a different material than the injection moulding and wherein the materials have good adhesion to each other, in order to create a permanent sealing between the components and hermetically seal the inside of the casing. Regarding claim 6, the modified Iwasaki discloses the method of claim 1. Iwasaki does not specifically disclose further comprising: inserting an electronics assembly inside the casing before the sealing. Showcatally (Fig. 8) teaches inserting an electronics assembly (CB) inside the casing (inserting 108, 110, 112, 114, 116) before sealing. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Showcatally and make Iwasaki’s method for encapsulation further comprising: inserting an electronics assembly inside the casing before the sealing, in order to protect the electronic assembly from the external environment. Regarding claim 9, Iwasaki discloses a casing (10) for encapsulation, comprising: a first casing component (11) connected to a second casing component (12) to form the casing, wherein the first casing component (11) and the second casing component (12) are configured to form a sealing groove (11c and 12c) along a seam between the first casing component (11) and the second casing component (12), wherein the first casing component (11) and the second casing component (12) are hermetically sealed from the seam by filling the sealing groove by injection moulding (see [0019]: “a sealing molding material 13 made of a sealing plastic is supplied between the recessed side 11c and the side 12c by injection-molding or the like.”), and the materials of the first casing component and the second casing component, and the material used for the injection moulding have adhesion properties with each other; and wherein the first casing component, the second casing component and the injection moulded seam are melted together when the seam is filled by injection moulding (see [0019]: “Then, a contact portion between the sealing molding material 13 and the first molded article 11 and a contact portion between the sealing molding material 13 and the second molded article 12 are melted and joined by heat generated when the melted sealing molding material 13 is sealed, thereby hermetically sealing the hollow sealing structure 10 including the first and second molded articles 11 and 12.”). Iwasaki does not specifically disclose materials of the first casing component and the second casing component, and a material used for injection moulding comprise an elastomer; and the first casing component, the second casing component and the injection molded seam are melted together at the seam. Shaw teaches a casing for encapsulation (fig. 5) wherein materials of a first casing component (11) and a second casing component (12) and a material used for sealing (74) are the same materials; and the first casing component, the second casing component and the sealing melt together at the seam (see col. 7 lines 50-66). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Shaw and make Iwasaki’s casing for encapsulation with the first casing component and the second casing component, and the first casing component, the second casing component and the injection molded seam are melted together at the seam, in order to create a permanent sealing between the components. The modified Iwasaki does not specifically disclose materials for the first casing component and the second casing component and a material used for injection moulding comprise an elastomer. Showcatally teaches the method (Fig. 1) wherein materials for a first casing component (102) and the second casing component (104) and a material used for sealing comprise an elastomer (col. 2 lines 31-40). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Showcatally and make the modified Iwasaki’s method with materials for the first casing component and the second casing component and a material used for injection moulding comprising an elastomer, in order to use a material with a low melting point, capable of flowing under heat that will guarantee a sealing connection at the sealing surfaces. Regarding claim 11, Iwasaki discloses an electronics assembly encapsulated with the casing (see par. [0026]): “the hollow sealing structure 10 can be used in a state where the electronic components, mechanical components, and the like disposed inside the hollow sealing structure 10 are satisfactorily protected.”). Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iwasaki, Shaw and Showcatally, and further in view of Nehm (US 5,370,150). Regarding claim 2, the modified Iwasaki discloses the method of claim 1. The modified Iwasaki does not specifically disclose a cross-section of the sealing groove is substantially semi-circular. Nehm teaches a method for encapsulation (figs 3-4) wherein a cross-section of a sealing groove is substantially semi-circular (see shape of 14). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the modified Iwasaki’s method for encapsulation with a cross- section of the sealing groove is substantially semi-circular as taught by Nehm, since the shape of the cross-section will depend on the dimensions of the housing in relation to the sealing feature and the method for integrating the sealing member. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iwasaki, Shaw and Showcatally, and further in view of Suzuki et al. (US 5,995,374; hereinafter Suzuki). Regarding claim 7, the modified Iwasaki discloses the method of claim 6. The modified Iwasaki does not specifically disclose further comprising: potting the electronics assembly before inserting the electronics assembly inside the casing, and wherein a size of the potted electronics assembly substantially corresponds to the size of the casing. Suzuki teaches (fig. 1) potting electronics assembly (1) before inserting the electronics assembly inside the casing (not shown), and wherein a size of the potted electronics assembly substantially corresponds to the size of the casing (see col 4, lines 66-64 and col 5 lines 1-3: “In the state after mold releasing where the bag-like body 5 is integrally stuck on the outside surface of the hardened sealing resin material 6, the resin-coated mount substrate 1 is accommodated, as it is, into an exterior casing (not shown) for practical use”). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of Suzuki and make the modified Iwasaki’s method for encapsulation further comprising: potting the electronics assembly before inserting the electronics assembly inside the casing, and wherein a size of the potted electronics assembly substantially corresponds to the size of the casing, in order to protect sensitive electronic components when placed inside the casing. Claim(s) 8 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iwasaki, Shaw and Showcatally, and further in view of ECOB (US 2011/0240088; hereinafter ECOB). Regarding claim 8, the modified Iwasaki discloses the method of claim 6. The modified Iwasaki does not specifically disclose the first casing component comprises wiring for the electronics assembly extending outside the casing, and wherein the first casing component and the wiring is made by injection moulding such that the wiring is hermetically sealed to the first casing component. ECOB teaches (fig. 1) a method for sealing wherein a first casing component (2) comprises wiring (22) for electronics assembly extending outside a casing, and wherein the first casing component (2) and the wiring (22) is made by injection moulding such that the wiring (22) is hermetically sealed to the first casing component (2) (see [0041]: “Main power cables 22 are shown in FIG. 1. As shown, the body 2 is molded (e.g. injection or compression) with integrally over-molded main electrical cables 22”). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of ECOB and make the modified Iwasaki’s method for encapsulation further comprising: the first casing component comprises wiring for the electronics assembly extending outside the casing, and wherein the first casing component and the wiring is made by injection moulding such that the wiring is hermetically sealed to the first casing component, in order to connect the casing with external devices and protect the electronic assembly components from the external environment. Regarding claim 10, the modified Iwasaki discloses the casing of claim 9. The modified Iwasaki does not specifically disclose wherein the first casing component comprises wiring configured to be coupled to an electronics assembly encapsulated by the casing and extending outside the casing, and wherein the wiring is hermetically sealed with the first casing component by injection moulding. ECOB teaches (fig. 1) a casing wherein a first casing component (2) comprises wiring (22) configured to be coupled to an electronics assembly encapsulated by the casing and extending outside the casing, and wherein the wiring (22) is hermetically sealed with the first casing (2) component by injection moulding (see [0041]: “Main power cables 22 are shown in FIG. 1. As shown, the body 2 is molded (e.g. injection or compression) with integrally over-molded main electrical cables 22”). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to apply the teachings of ECOB and make the modified Iwasaki’s casing wherein the first casing component comprises wiring configured to be coupled to an electronics assembly encapsulated by the casing and extending outside the casing, and wherein the wiring is hermetically sealed with the first casing component by injection moulding, in order to connect the casing with external devices and protect the electronic assembly components from the external environment. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIMARY S LOPEZ CRUZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7893. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Wellington can be reached at 571-272-4483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIMARY S LOPEZ CRUZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 19, 2023
Application Filed
May 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 15, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764214
DISPLAY MODULES
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12733123
CABINET AND SERVER
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12554284
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12554292
RECEPTACLE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12484176
ADJUSTABLE MEMBERS FOR SECURITY BEZELS
2y 1m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
19%
With Interview (-53.8%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 475 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month