Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/551,809

COMPOSITE DRUG PARTICLES AND USES THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 21, 2023
Priority
Mar 31, 2021 — provisional 63/168,829 +2 more
Examiner
DAVIS, BRIAN J
Art Unit
1614
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
The Regents of the University of Michigan
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1336 granted / 1575 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1612
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1575 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction Inventor’s election, without traverse, of the claims of Group I (claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 9-11, 14, 15, 18, 19, 26 and 27) and the species combination of sodium deoxycholate combined with Au(III) ions as the Group and species, respectively, elected to begin prosecution is acknowledged. The election/restriction is hereby made FINAL. Markush Search All elected claims have been examined with respect to formal matters. The elected combination has been searched and is deemed free of the prior art. The search was, therefore, expanded as called for under Markush examination practice to include a single additional combination. That combination is (i) abiraterone acetate (a salt of a compound having a steroid core structure) and (ii) an acid with is citric acid. All claimed but as yet unexamined subject matter which does not read on the above combination is hereby withdrawn from consideration, for purposes of this Office Action, as being drawn to non-elected subject matter. This subject matte will be rejoined as appropriate as the Markush examination progresses. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 9, 18, 26 and 27, in so far as they read on the combination above, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by US 10,045,998 B2. The reference teaches a solid, cocrystalline combination of abiraterone acetate with acids, such as citric acid, utilized as a pharmaceutical preparation (abstract; column 4, line 47). The solid, cocrystalline combinations are obtained as fine powders with a median size between 1-50 µm and preferably between 1-10 µm (column 6, line 65). Convention pharmaceutical carriers may be incorporated in the pharmaceutical formulations and are explicitly taught (column 7, line 29). Claim 26 is included in this rejection because its limitation (that the particle is essentially free of transition metal nanoparticles) is intrinsic to the prior art solid, cocrystalline combination. Allowable Subject Matter The elected combination being free of the prior art, any claim, or portion of a claim, drawn exclusively to this elected combination constitutes allowable subject matter. That being the case, claims 2, 5 and 14 are objected to because they are drawn to both allowable subject matter (the elected combination), as well as subject matter which has not yet been completely searched. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN J DAVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-0638. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:00 PM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ali Soroush, can be reached at 571-272-9925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN J DAVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1614 6/19/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678516
IMMUNOSTIMULATORY TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR AGONIST-NANOPARTICLE FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673026
LIPOSOMAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF FOR IMPROVED STABILITY, BIOAVAILABILITY & SUSTAINED RELEASE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667560
CO-ADMINISTRATION OF MIRDAMETINIB AND LIFIRAFENIB FOR USE IN TREATING CANCERS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667555
IMPROVED TREATMENT OF OVARIAN CANCER WITH NIROGACESTAT
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667814
PREPARATION OF AN AMINO-FUNCTIONAL POLYORGANOSILOXANE EMULSION
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (-4.2%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month