Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/551,914

SUPPORT JACK COMPRISING A SUPPORT FOOT AND A FORCE MEASURING ELEMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Priority
Mar 25, 2021 — DE 102021001552.5 +1 more
Examiner
WILSON, LEE D
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Jost-Werke Deutschland GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1488 granted / 1860 resolved
+10.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1883
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§102
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1860 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 and 21-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by How to Install a Pressure Gauge on a Hydraulic Press PNG media_image1.png 52 382 media_image1.png Greyscale . PNG media_image2.png 944 1658 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 944 1658 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 898 1646 media_image4.png Greyscale 1. (Previously Presented) A support jack, comprising: a support foot 100 and a force measuring element 200, wherein the support jack has an outer tube 300 and an inner tube 400 movably mounted therein, and the support foot is pivotably secured to the inner tube by a foot receiving element, wherein the force measuring element is attached to the foot receiving element. 2. (Previously Presented) The support jack according to claim 1, wherein a force is determined by the force measuring element as a function of the deformation of the foot receiving element. This is the natural function of the device 21. (New) The support jack according to claim 1, wherein the foot receiving element is a component arranged in a flow of force between the support foot and the inner tube of the support jack. All parts work in concert with each other or a flow 22. (New) The support jack according to claim 1, wherein in addition to a quantitative determination of whether the support jack is in contact with a ground surface that is performed by the force measuring element, the force measuring element also provides a quantitative determination of a load acting on the support jack. This is the natural function of the device Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4 and 6-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. There are new rejections and allowable subject matter. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The 892 form discloses prior art being made of record. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEE D WILSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4499. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6;30-4;30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN KELLER can be reached at 571-272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEE D. WILSON Examiner Art Unit 3723 Ldw /LEE D WILSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723 September 11, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 31, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746608
CLAMP FOR KEY CUTTING MACHINE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745878
MULTIFUNCTIONAL CUTTING BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741348
SYSTEM FOR MACHINING WORKPIECES, MACHINE TOOL, SUPPORT DEVICE AND WORKPIECE SUPPORT
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734619
WELDING CLAMP
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734624
HOLDER PLATE FOR NEGATIVE PRESSURE CHUCKING, HOLDER DEVICE FOR NEGATIVE PRESSURE CHUCKING, AND DE-BONDING STATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1860 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month