Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/551,972

TWO-COMPONENT CURABLE RESIN COMPOSITION AND CURED PRODUCT THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Priority
Apr 08, 2021 — JP 2021-065804 +1 more
Examiner
FIORITO, JAMES A
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Threebond Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
530 granted / 740 resolved
+6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
770
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 740 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 7, the phrase “a curing catalyst of component c” is indefinite because it is unclear whether the curing catalyst is for curing component c or part of component c. For the purpose of examination, the Office interprets this feature to mean that the curing catalyst is a component for curing component c. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2014017218. Regarding claims 1-6, and 8-9, WO ‘218 discloses a two-part curable composition, specifically as shown in Example 1: Dose A and Dose B were prepared by mixing the respective compounding substances in the compounding ratio shown in Table 2 and by degassing and stirring at 25 C. Agent A: bisphenol A type epoxy resin 100 parts, tin based cure catalyst B1 7 parts, KBM-403 (3- glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane). 1 part; Agent B: SAT200 (polymer with backbone of polyoxypropylene and dimethoxysilyl group at molecular end) 90 parts, EH30 (2, 4, 6-tris (dimethylamino) methylphenol) 8 parts, KBM-603 (N-2-(aminoethyl)-3- aminopropyltrimethoxysilane) 2 parts. (See Example 1). WO ‘218 does not expressly state in an example that the expoxy resin comprise component contains both (a-1) hydrogenated epoxy resin and (a-2) bisphenol type epoxy resin. However, WO ‘218 teaches that previously known epoxy resins can be widely used, without being particularly limited, one may cite, for example, bisphenol A type epoxy resins, a bisphenol F type epoxy resin, a bisphenol AD type epoxy resin, bisphenol S type epoxy resins, epoxy resins obtained by hydrogenating them, glycidyl ester type epoxy resins, glycidyl amine type epoxy resins, alicyclic epoxy resins, aliphatic epoxy resins, novolac type epoxy resins, urethane-modified epoxy resins having urethane linkages, fluorinated epoxy resins, rubber-modified epoxy resins (e.g., a flame retardant epoxy resin such as a glycidyl ether of tetrabromobisphenol A and the like. These epoxy resins can be used alone or in combination with two or more kinds (see paragraph 17 of the specification). Thus, based on the disclosure of WO ’218, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art to choose a hydrogenated epoxy resin for co-use with a bisphenol type epoxy resin as an obvious combination of known prior art elements that would provide predictable results (See MPEP 2143). Regarding claim 7, WO ‘218 does not expressly state that a ratio of a-1 and a-2. However, it would have been obvious to the person having ordinary skill in the art to form a combination of expoxy resins having at least equal proportion with predictable results. Regarding claim 10-11, WO ‘218 discloses the mixture was coated and thinly stretched on the surface of the adherend, attached at a temperature of 23 C and a relative humidity of 50%, and pressed with a clamp having a width of 30 mm in such a manner that the thickness of the adhesive layer became 0.1 mm in 2. The attachment area was 12.5 mm X 25 mm. The attached adherend was left under conditions of temperature 23 C and relative humidity 50% for 24 hours as a test body of a tensile shear test. A curable composition having fast curability with excellent storage stability and fast curing speed is obtained. In addition, the curable composition exhibits excellent adhesive properties (see paragraphs 113, 136 of the specification). As such, WO ‘218 also discloses a cured article as well as a composite. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A FIORITO whose telephone number is (571)272-9921. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES A FIORITO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741869
SODIUM BOROHYDRIDE PRODUCTION METHOD
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735324
RUTHENIUM PROMOTER CATALYST COMPOSITIONS
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735326
HIGH-PERFORMANCE SODIUM ION ELECTROLYTES AND EFFICIENT METHODS FOR MAKING THE SAME
11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729123
Method for Obtaining Bimodal Mesoporous Materials Based on Silicon Oxides Using Microwave Radiation
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729130
DOPED RARE EARTH-CONTAINING MATERIALS AND THEIR PROPERTIES
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.9%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 740 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month