Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/552,175

Switching Device Using Split Movable Carrier Set With Incorporated Main And Auxiliary Electrical Conductors

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 11, 2024
Priority
Mar 26, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTBR2021050127
Examiner
TALPALATSKI, ALEXANDER
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Weg Drives & Controls - Automação Ltda
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
608 granted / 846 resolved
+3.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
881
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
81.1%
+41.1% vs TC avg
§102
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 846 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 10, and 12-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Puetz et al. (US 3643188) in view of De Barros Albuquerque (US 9601290). In re claim 1, Puetz, in figures 1-4, discloses an electromagnetic switching device comprising: a lower set that houses at least one pair of main fixed elongated conductor members (34), each of the main fixed elongated conductor members comprising a main fixed conductor end, wherein the main fixed conductor ends of the pair of main fixed elongated conductor members are separated from each other by a gap (as best seen in figure 3); a stationary intermediate set that comprises a fixed core (96) and coil (98), arranged above the lower set; an upper cover (22) arranged above the stationary intermediate set (2); a split movable carrier (figure 5) of the stationary intermediate set, comprising an upper portion arranged above the fixed core, and a lower portion, arranged below the fixed core, which houses at least one main movable conductor bridge (36), comprising main movable conductor ends; the upper portion of the split movable carrier houses a movable core (as seen in the figures). Puetz does not teach auxiliary contacts. De Barros Albuquerque however, in figures 1-5, discloses a similar device having at least one auxiliary movable conductor bridge (73), comprising conductor ends. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have adapted auxiliary conductor bridge structure as taught by De Barros Albuquerque to the device of Puetz to provide additional switching capacity to the device. In re claim 2, Puetz, in figures 1-4, discloses that the split movable carrier is configured to operate between a first and a second operating position, wherein in the first operating position, the main fixed and main movable conductor ends are separated from each other by the gap and wherein in the second operating position, the main fixed elongated conductor members are electrically connected by means of the main fixed conductor ends in contact with the main movable conductor ends of the main movable conductor bridge (inherent function of the shown device). In re claim 3, Puetz, in figures 1-4, discloses that the fixed core of the stationary intermediate set is fastened by means of fastening latches (112,114). In re claim 10, Puetz, in figures 1-4, discloses a connection set provides an electric power connection access for the main fixed elongated conductor members, by means of the fastening elements (52). In re claim 12, De Barros Albuquerque discloses that the auxiliary conductor movable bridge of the movable split carrier operates alternatively between a first and a second operating position, wherein the stationary intermediate set further comprises an auxiliary fixed support for one or more auxiliary fixed elongated conductor members (as best seen in figure 4); wherein in the first operating position auxiliary fixed conductor ends of a pair of auxiliary fixed elongated conductor members (31,32), each comprise a spacing in a gap and wherein in the second operating position, the auxiliary fixed conductor ends are connected to the auxiliary movable bridge by means of the auxiliary movable conductor ends (inherent function of the shown structure). In re claim 13, Puetz, in figures 1-4, discloses the split movable carrier slides on sliding guides (at surface 58 between structures 178 as seen in figures 1 and 4) of the stationary intermediate set; and wherein the lower portion comprises at least one lower laying chamber (between 64 and 70) for the main movable conductor bridge and for main springs (inside 66). In re claim 14, De Barros Albuquerque discloses that the upper cover comprises an electrical conductor passage groove (41) and can configured to house a block (43) in a cavity. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-9 and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A list of pertinent prior art is attached in form PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alexander Talpalatski whose telephone number is (571)270-3908. The examiner can normally be reached 10 AM - 6 PM PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 5712723985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Alexander Talpalatski/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676274
METHODS AND SYSTEMS INCLUDING LEAF SPRINGS FOR A RELAY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671047
RELAY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658349
ACTUATOR AND OPTICAL DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651936
FOUR-POLE SYNCHRONOUS RELUCTANCE MOTOR
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12651718
MOVABLE CONTACT PART AND DC RELAY INCLUDING SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 7m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 846 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month