Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/552,439

CR-SI FILM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 26, 2023
Priority
Mar 29, 2021 — JP 2021-054735 +1 more
Examiner
SHERMAN, ERIC SCOTT
Art Unit
1736
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Tosoh Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
65 granted / 90 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
124
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
65.4%
+25.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 90 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-9 are pending, of which claims 8-9 have been withdrawn. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 8-9 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/11/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 4392992 (“Paulson”). Regarding claim 1, Paulson teaches a resistor film comprising chromium and silicon (see e.g. col. 2, lines 56-65). The film can have chromium in an amount that is preferably 25-29% and silicon in an amount that is preferably 55-67%, which gives a value of Cr/(Cr+Si) of 0.27 to 0.35, the entirety of which is within the claimed range (see e.g. col. 3, lines 25-26). When 6% nitrogen is added, the TCR is constant with respect to temperature across the entire recited temperature range and is near 0 ppm/°C, which is within the claimed range (see e.g. FIG. 3 and col. 8, lines 47-52). Regarding claim 2, Paulson teaches that, at least in certain embodiments, the TCR is constant with respect to temperature, which means that the difference between the minimum and maximum values would be less than 100 ppm/°C (see e.g. FIG. 3 and col. 8, lines 47-52). Regarding claim 3, Paulson teaches that, at least in certain embodiments, the TCR is constant with respect to temperature and nearly 0, which means that the absolute values of TCR are less than 50 ppm/°C (see e.g. FIG. 3 and col. 8, lines 47-52). Regarding claim 4, Paulson teaches that, at least in certain embodiments, the TCR is constant with respect to temperature and nearly 0, which means that the absolute value of an average TCR across the recited temperature range is less than 50 ppm/°C (see e.g. FIG. 3 and col. 8, lines 47-52). Regarding claim 5, Paulson teaches that the film can have chromium in an amount that is preferably 25-29% and silicon in an amount that is preferably 55-67%, which gives a value of Cr/(Cr+Si) of 0.27 to 0.35 and overlaps significantly with the claimed range (see e.g. col. 3, lines 25-26). Regarding claim 6, Paulson teaches that the film further comprises nitrogen (see e.g. col. 2, lines 56-65). Regarding claim 7, Paulson teaches that the film can have silicon in an amount that is preferably 55-67% and nitrogen in an amount of preferably 8-16%, meaning that the value of Si – N is between 39-59%, the entirety of which is within the claimed range (see e.g. col. 3, lines 25-26). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC S SHERMAN whose telephone number is (703)756-4784. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5:00 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Zimmer can be reached at (571)270-3591. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /E.S.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1736 /ANTHONY J ZIMMER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671122
FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR AND METHOD FOR RECOVERING ACTIVE METAL OF LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY USING SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668496
Methods and Apparatuses for Making Nanomaterials in Space
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665100
URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE BYPRODUCTS AND/OR MATERIALS DISPOSAL
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662397
COMPOUNDS AND PROCESSES FOR REMEDIATION OF PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661639
INORGANIC COMPOUND, DISPERSION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND FILM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, INORGANIC COMPOUND, METHOD FOR PRODUCING METHANE AND HYDROGEN, DISPERSION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND FILM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+14.6%)
3y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 90 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month