Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/552,557

SETTER FOR CERAMIC FIRING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 26, 2023
Priority
Mar 31, 2021 — JP 2021-060508 +1 more
Examiner
AUER, LAURA A
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Denka Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
231 granted / 470 resolved
-15.9% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
519
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
81.6%
+41.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 470 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Watanabe et al. (JP 2000-119068). Regarding claim 1, Watanabe discloses a setter comprising a boron nitride sintered plate with a porous structure, see abstract and [0001]. The reference further discloses that the porous boron nitride sintered body has a porosity of 40 to 60% by volume [0018]. Note that the disclosed range overlaps the claimed ranges and that a prima facie case of obviousness exists where ranges “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art”; see MPEP 2144.05 I. Additionally, the reference discloses the average pore diameter of the through holes is preferably 1 micron or less [0013]. Given the average pore diameter is 1 micron or less, the reference is considered to render obvious the claimed proportion of pore having a pore diameter of 0.2 to 0.9 microns; see MPEP 2144.05 I. Lastly, it is noted that the claimed method of measuring the porosity does not structurally limit the claim. Regarding claim 2, while the reference does not specifically disclose the claimed coefficient of thermal expansion, given the disclosed material and the claimed material have the same composition and microstructure (i.e. porous boron nitride), it is expected the disclosed and claimed setters will have the same coefficient of thermal expansion; see above discussion and MPEP 2112.01 II: “if the composition is physically the same, it must have the same properties.” Regarding claim 3, given the reference discloses the porous structure as through-holes, the reference is considered to disclose all the pores as open pores [0013]. Regarding claims 4 and 5, the reference discloses the boron nitride as having a purity of 99% or more by weight, which is considered to render obvious the claimed content of iron and of calcium [0018]. Regarding claims 6 and 7, given the reference discloses the average pore diameter as 1 micron or less, the reference is considered to render obvious the claimed value of the peak position in a distribution curve of the pore diameters [0013]; see MPEP 2144.05 I. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAURA A AUER whose telephone number is (571)270-5669. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9 am - 4 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, M. Veronica Ewald can be reached at (571)272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA A AUER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630463
GLASS COMPOSITION, AND GLASS FIBER AND GLASS ARTICLE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623945
METHOD OF AUTOMATIC MASS PRODUCTION OF GLASS CONTAINERS, OBTAINED GLASS CONTAINERS AND MOLD FOR OBTAINING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626862
DIELECTRIC COMPOSITION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623956
GLASS-CERAMIC AND SUBSTRATE THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12600675
CERAMIC MATERIAL FOR THERMAL BARRIER COATING AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+34.6%)
3y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 470 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month