Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/552,652

MOTION ANALYSIS DEVICE, MOTION ANALYSIS METHOD, MOTION ANALYSIS PROGRAM, AND MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 26, 2023
Priority
Apr 28, 2021 — JP 2021-075979 +1 more
Examiner
YANG, JIANXUN
Art Unit
2662
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Omron Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
479 granted / 645 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
686
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
91.9%
+51.9% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 645 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1 and 3-7 are pending. Claim 2 is canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more Claim(s) particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more Claim(s) particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 7 recites limitation “... a detector configured to detect a motion performed to achieve a specific target... about a target motion ... about a result caused by the motion...”. It is unclear whether the limitation “the motion” refers to the first antecedent limitation “a motion performed to achieve a specific target” or to the second antecedent limitation “a target motion”, recited in the claim. “The motion” could be either “a motion performed to achieve a specific target” or “a target motion”. The ambiguity renders the claim indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 3-6 are allowed. Applicant’s amendment and argument filed on 12/1/2025 regarding claims 1 and 5-6 are persuasive. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 12/1/2025 with respect to the 112b rejection to claim 7 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. See the updated review comments for details. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIANXUN YANG whose telephone number is (571)272-9874. The examiner can normally be reached on MON-FRI: 8AM-5PM Pacific Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amandeep Saini can be reached on (571)272-3382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center. for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272- 1000. /JIANXUN YANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2662 1/19/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639797
IMAGE INPAINTING METHOD AND DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639800
DEFECT DETECTION FOR DENTAL APPLIANCES
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633104
IMAGE FEATURE TRANSMISSION METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633082
METHOD FOR GENERATING CONTOUR DATA, COMPUTER DEVICE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626368
IMAGE ANALYSIS FOR AERIAL IMAGES
2y 12m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+19.0%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 645 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month