Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/552,866

TERMINAL, BASE STATION, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Priority
Mar 29, 2021 — JP 2021-056210 +1 more
Examiner
SOE, KYAW Z
Art Unit
2412
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
319 granted / 356 resolved
+31.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
388
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
76.3%
+36.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 356 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This office action is a response to an application filed on 09/27/2023. Claims 1- 14 are pending for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Drawings The Examiner contends that the drawings submitted on 09/27/2023 are acceptable for examination proceedings. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) were submitted. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102[a][2] as being anticipated by Oh et al. (US 20210144660 A1); hereinafter “Oh”. Regarding claim 1, Oh teaches A terminal, comprising: reception circuitry, which, in operation, receives a synchronization signal[Oh: Figs. 12-13]; and control circuitry, which, in operation, determines a correspondence relation between a transmission position of a synchronization signal block and an index of the synchronization signal block [Oh: Figs. 7, 10-11; Par. 207- 209 teaches terminal determine the number N of the synchronization signal blocks through SIB information includes the signal block index used for synchronization acquisition and detected or obtained using the number N of the blocks], wherein the control circuitry changes the correspondence relation between a first reception timing and a second reception timing of the synchronization signal block [Oh: Par. 152, 172- 175 teaches transmission period is set differently according to sync signal block transmission period, the signal block is transmitted in time period such as T1- 20ms]. Regarding claim 2, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches the control circuitry changes the correspondence relation by shifting the index of the synchronization signal block with respect to the transmission position of the synchronization signal block by a fixed amount [Oh: Par. 152, 172- 175 teaches transmission period is set differently according to sync signal block transmission period, the signal block is transmitted in time period such as T1- 20ms]. Regarding claim 3, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches the control circuitry changes the correspondence relation by shifting the index of the synchronization signal block with respect to the transmission position of the synchronization signal block depending on a system frame number [Oh: par. 114 teaches of transmitting over frame number of block index]. Regarding claim 4, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches the control circuitry reverses the correspondence relation of the index of the synchronization signal block with respect to the transmission position of the synchronization signal block between the first reception timing and the second reception timing [Oh: par. 57 teaches of scheduling information transmitted on transmitting timing indicators]. Regarding claim 5, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches the control circuitry changes the correspondence relation by inputting a system frame number into a pseudo-random number expression [Oh: Par. 112 teaches of configuration expressed by numbers in equation]. Regarding claim 6, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches the control circuitry changes the correspondence relation using a system frame number with reference to a table indicating the correspondence relation for each system frame number [Oh: Par. 91- 92]. Regarding claim 7, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches the control circuitry changes the correspondence relation using a cell identifier [Oh: Par. 112 teaches of including Cell ID]. Regarding claim 8, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches using a cell identifier or information included in a System Information Block (SIB), the control circuitry switches a changing method for changing the correspondence relation [Oh: Par. 114 teaches of transmitting through SIB PDCCH configuration]. Regarding claim 9, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches based on information included in a System Information Block (SIB), the control circuitry changes the fixed amount of the shifting [Oh: Par. 162- 163 included acquired information through SIB, and determine he number N of SS blocks]. Regarding claim 10, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches based on information included in a System Information Block (SIB), the control circuitry changes a shift amount of the shifting [Oh: Par. 162- 163 included acquired information through SIB, and determine he number N of SS blocks]. Regarding claim 11, Oh teaches all the limitations in the parent claim 1. Oh further teaches the control circuitry changes the correspondence relation further based on a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) or a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) [Oh: Par. 114 teaches of transmitting through SIB PDCCH configuration]. Regarding claim 12 , , Oh teaches A base station, comprising: transmission circuitry, which, in operation, transmits a synchronization signal; and [Oh: Figs. 12-13]; control circuitry, which, in operation, determines a correspondence relation between a transmission position of a synchronization signal block and an index of the synchronization signal block [Oh: Figs. 7, 10-11; Par. 207- 209 teaches terminal determine the number N of the synchronization signal blocks through SIB information includes the signal block index used for synchronization acquisition and detected or obtained using the number N of the blocks], the control circuitry changes the correspondence relation between a first transmission timing and a second transmission timing of the synchronization signal block [Oh: Par. 152, 172- 175 teaches transmission period is set differently according to sync signal block transmission period, the signal block is transmitted in time period such as T1- 20ms]. Regarding claim 13 , the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 1. Regarding claim 14, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record (see attached PTO-892) and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A shortened statutory period for reply to this action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of the action. An extension of time may be obtained under 37 CFR 1.136(a). However, in no event, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYAW Z SOE whose telephone number is (571)270-0304. The examiner can normally be reached on 9am-5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles C Jiang can be reached on 5712707191. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KYAW Z SOE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2412
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641589
METHODS AND DEVICES OF CLEAR MEDIUM CALIBRATION COORDINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641654
Remote Mobile Device Management
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12550085
TIMING ADVANCE LOOPS
2y 4m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543129
EMPLOYING DITHERED CLOCK IN DISTRIBUTED RADIO SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12532272
TRANSMISSION DIVERSITY FOR ALE NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 356 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month