Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/553,621

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DATA TRANSMISSION IN FULL DUPLEX MODE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 02, 2023
Examiner
CUNNINGHAM, KEVIN M
Art Unit
2461
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Lenovo (Beijing) Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
413 granted / 577 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
634
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
58.0%
+18.0% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 577 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fakoorian et al (US 2021/0329646, hereinafter Fakoorian, claiming priority date of provisional application 63/013,433). Regarding claim 1, Fakoorian discloses a method performed by a user equipment (UE), the method comprising: determining a first plurality of bandwidth parts (BWPs) for a first set of slots, wherein the first set of slots are preconfigured for a first link (UE is configured with multiple BWPs, Para [0070], BWP configuration may indicate downlink BWPs and uplink BWPs, Para [0108], slots can be configured for TDD communications (i.e. uplink slots or downlink slots), Para [0055] or configured for sub-band full duplex, Para [0122]); and receiving, from a base station, a configuration indicating utilizing a first bandwidth part for the first set of slots for a second link (BS transmits a second BWP configuration to the UE, where second (i.e. first) BWP is for one or more slots, Para [0056]), wherein the first link is one of uplink and downlink and the second link is the other one of uplink and downlink (the second BWP can be for uplink BWP, downlink BWP or both, Para [0056]. Also see Para [0066] from the provisional application). Regarding claim 16, Fakoorian discloses a user equipment (UE, Para [0006]), comprising: at least one memory and at least one processor (processor and memory, Para [0006]) coupled with the at least one memory and configured to cause the UE to: determine a first plurality of bandwidth parts (BWPs) for a first set of slots, wherein the first set of slots are preconfigured for a first link (UE is configured with multiple BWPs, Para [0070], BWP configuration may indicate downlink BWPs and uplink BWPs, Para [0108], slots can be configured for TDD communications (i.e. uplink slots or downlink slots), Para [0055] or configured for sub-band full duplex, Para [0122]); and receive, from a base station, a configuration indicating utilizing a first bandwidth part for the first set of slots for a second link (BS transmits a second BWP configuration to the UE, where second (i.e. first) BWP is for one or more slots, Para [0056]), wherein the first link is one of uplink and downlink and the second link is the other one of uplink and downlink (the second BWP can be for uplink BWP, downlink BWP or both, Para [0056]. Also see Para [0066] from the provisional application). Regarding claim 20, Fakoorian discloses a processor (processor, Para [0006]) for wireless communication, comprising: at least one controller coupled with at least one memory (processor and memory, Para [0006]) and configured to cause the processor to: determine a first plurality of bandwidth parts (BWPs) for a first set of slots, wherein the first set of slots are preconfigured for a first link (UE is configured with multiple BWPs, Para [0070], BWP configuration may indicate downlink BWPs and uplink BWPs, Para [0108], slots can be configured for TDD communications (i.e. uplink slots or downlink slots), Para [0055] or configured for sub-band full duplex, Para [0122]); and receive, from a base station, a configuration indicating utilizing a first bandwidth part for the first set of slots for a second link (BS transmits a second BWP configuration to the UE, where second (i.e. first) BWP is for one or more slots, Para [0056]), wherein the first link is one of uplink and downlink and the second link is the other one of uplink and downlink (the second BWP can be for uplink BWP, downlink BWP or both, Para [0056]. Also see Para [0066] from the provisional application). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-11, 14, 15 and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fakoorian and in view of Hsieh et al (US 2021/0144644, hereinafter Hsieh). Regarding claim 10, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 1, but not wherein the configuration is associated with an RRC signaling with a bitmap. Hsieh discloses the BS can transmit an RRC message with a bitmap, where the bitmap corresponds to the configured BWPs, Para [0070]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to utilize the techniques taught by Hsieh in the system of Fakoorian in order to reduce power consumption and properly indicate the BWPs in the configuration. Regarding claims 2 and 17, Fakoorian discloses the method/UE of claim 1/16, wherein the first bandwidth part is included in a first additional plurality of bandwidth parts (UE is configured with multiple BWPs, Para [0070], obvious to one of ordinary skill this can be additional BWPs). Regarding claims 3 and 18, Fakoorian discloses the method/UE of claim 2/17, further comprising: performing data transmission or reception with at least one of the first plurality of bandwidth parts for the first link and the first bandwidth part for the second link in a same slot (full duplex, both UL and DL BWP are in the same slot, Fig. 4). Regarding claims 4 and 19, Fakoorian discloses the method/UE of claim 1/16, further comprising: determining a second plurality of bandwidth parts for a second set of slots, wherein the second set of slots are preconfigured for the second link (UE is configured with multiple BWPs, Para [0070], BWP configuration may indicate downlink BWPs and uplink BWPs, Para [0108], slots can be configured for TDD communications (i.e. uplink slots or downlink slots), Para [0055] or configured for sub-band full duplex, Para [0122]). Regarding claim 5, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 4, wherein the configuration further indicates utilizing a second bandwidth part for the second set of slots for the first link (BS transmits a second BWP configuration to the UE, where second BWP is for one or more slots, Para [0056]). Regarding claim 6, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 5, wherein the second bandwidth part is selected from a second additional plurality of bandwidth parts for the first link (UE is configured with multiple BWPs, Para [0070], obvious to one of ordinary skill this can be additional BWPs). Regarding claim 7, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 6, further comprising: performing data transmission with at least one of the first plurality of bandwidth parts for the first link and the first bandwidth part for the second link in a same slot; and performing data transmission with the second plurality of bandwidth parts for the second link and the second bandwidth part for the first link in a same slot (UE is configured with multiple BWPs, Para [0070], BWP configuration may indicate downlink BWPs and uplink BWPs, Para [0108], configured for sub-band full duplex, Para [0122]/Fig. 4). Regarding claim 8, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 4, further comprising: each of the first plurality of bandwidth parts has a same center frequency as a corresponding one in the second plurality of bandwidth parts (UL and DL BWPs may have the same center frequencies, Para [0035]). Regarding claim 9, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 4, further comprising: each of the first plurality of bandwidth parts is paired with a corresponding one in the second plurality of bandwidth parts, which has a same bandwidth part ID (UL and DL BWPs may have the same BWP identifiers, Para [0035], they can be paired, Para [0108]). Regarding claim 11, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the configuration is associated downlink control information (DCI) (the second BWP configuration may include instructions for receiving DCI, Para [0014]). Regarding claim 14, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 2, wherein each of the bandwidth part in the first plurality of the bandwidth parts is associated with a corresponding bandwidth part of a first additional plurality of the bandwidth parts configured for the UE, and a first bandwidth part in the first plurality of the bandwidth parts is associated with a first bandwidth part of the first additional plurality of the bandwidth parts (UL and DL BWPs can be paired together, Para [0108], also obvious variation the BWPs have some association with each other). Regarding claim 15, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 14, wherein if bandwidth part switching happens between two bandwidth parts in the first plurality of BWPs, bandwidth part switching happens between two bandwidth parts in the first additional plurality of bandwidth parts associated with the two bandwidth parts in the first additional plurality of bandwidth parts (optional limitation, dynamic switching BWP configurations, Para [0103], DCI BWP switching field, Para [0108]). Claims 12 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fakoorian and in view of Shi (US 2020/0328867, hereinafter Shi). Regarding claim 12, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 1, but not wherein the configuration further indicates a first time duration for activating the first bandwidth part. Shi discloses activation time rule for the terminal to control activation of at least one BWP, Para [0020], which can be a pre-configured time pattern, Para [0060]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to utilize the techniques taught by Shi in the system of Fakoorian in order to allow for possible BWP activation control on the terminal side. Regarding claim 13, Fakoorian discloses the method of claim 1, but not wherein the configuration further indicates a second time duration for deactivating the first bandwidth part. Shi discloses deactivation time rule for the terminal to control deactivation of at least one BWP, Para [0020], which can be a pre-configured time pattern, Para [0060]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN CUNNINGHAM whose telephone number is (571) 272-1765. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday 7:30-18:00 (EST). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Vu can be reached on (571) 272-3155. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN M CUNNINGHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2461
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587411
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ISOLATING NETWORK TRAFFIC OF MULTIPLE USERS ACROSS NETWORKS OF COMPUTING PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581535
RESOURCE EXCLUSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574166
METHOD FOR RETRANSMISSION-RELATED OPERATION OF RELAY UE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12532325
PDCCH MONITORING METHOD AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, TERMINAL, AND BASE STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12526869
SLEEPING CELL DETECTION IN AN OPEN RADIO ACCESS NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month