Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/553,646

RESIN COMPOSITION AND MOLDED BODY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 02, 2023
Priority
Apr 14, 2021 — JP 2021-068309 +1 more
Examiner
HALL, DEVE V.
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
SUMITOMO CHEMICAL Company, Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
695 granted / 927 resolved
+10.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
951
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 927 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by ITO et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2014/0187721, hereinafter ITO). Regarding claims 1 and 7, ITO teaches a resin composition comprising a hard resin may be mixtures of polyetherimide (PEI), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and polysulfone (PSU) (well-known to be aromatic) [0016] and a fibrous inorganic filler may also be added into the resin composition [0018]. Examples of inorganic fillers include carbon fiber, glass fiber, alumina fiber, potassium titanate fiber, boron fiber, or silicon carbide fiber [0018]. The resin composition is mixed in an twin-screw extruder [0025]. The resin composition is injection molded (Example 1; [0028]) to for a sliding member including bearings, guide members, chains, gears, thrust washers, seal rings, and the like [0026]. Claims 1-3, 5, and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by ANEJA et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2007/0197739, hereinafter ANEJA). Regarding claims 1 and 7, ANEJA teaches filled phase-separated blends (composites [0222]) of polyether ether ketones and at least one polysulfone etherimide (Abstract; [0003 and 0015]). Note: polysulfone etherimide is a well-known aromatic polysulfone [0019]. In one embodiment, the blends include a polyetherimide [0022, 0149, 0151, and 0246 (Table 1)]. The filled compositions include one or more fillers selected from carbon fibers, aramid fibers, metallic fibers, metal-coated fibers, natural fibers, and reinforcing fibers [0172-0175]. Regarding claim 2, ANEJA teaches the final resin blend comprises 30 to 70% of polyaryl ether ketone resin of the entire mixture and 70 to 30% of polysulfone etherimide ([0026] and [0257] (Example 14)) (which is in within the claimed range of less than 40% by mass based on a total content of the polyether ether ketone, the aromatic polysulfone, a polyetherimide, and a fibrous filler). Regarding claim 3, ANEJA teaches the final resin blend comprises 30 to 70% of polyaryl ether ketone resin of the entire mixture and 70 to 30% of polysulfone etherimide ([0026] and [0257] (Example 14)) (which is within the claimed is 25% by mass or more based on the total content of the polyether ether ketone, the aromatic polysulfone, and the polyetherimide). Regarding claim 5, ANEJA teaches the blend composition comprises from 1 to 98 wt% of the at least filler (Claim 1). When converted from wt% to parts by mass, the amount of filler is within the claimed range of 10 parts or more and 100 parts by mass or less as claimed. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 and 6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. ITO et al. and ANEJA et al. are the closest prior art of record, however the references do not teach the claim limitations of claims 4 and 6. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEVE V HALL whose telephone number is (571)270-7738. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9 am-5 pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Del Sole can be reached at (571) 272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DEVE V. HALL Primary Examiner Art Unit 1763 /DEVE V HALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692370
POLYAMIDE COMPOSITE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692329
FUNCTIONALIZED HYDROGENATED POLYMERS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692362
SULFUR-CROSSLINKABLE RUBBER COMPOSITION COMPRISING A GRAFT COPOLYMER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686730
A METHOD FOR OBTAINING PLASTIC ADMIXTURE MATERIAL AND BIOPLASTIC MATERIAL FROM BREAD WASTE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679917
GRAFT-MODIFIED PRODUCT, ADHESIVE, OLEFIN RESIN COMPOSITION, AND LAMINATE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+16.9%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 927 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month