Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/553,842

RADIO WAVE ABSORBING ELEMENT AND ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Examiner
ZHU, NOAH YI MIN
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
49 granted / 60 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
99
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 60 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 10/04/2023 and 05/08/2025 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement(s) is/are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 3, the claim recites the limitation “the electromagnetic wave” in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 3 depends from Claim 1, but “an electromagnetic wave” is first recited in Claim 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Carceller (US 2020/0235480). Regarding Claim 1, Carceller discloses: A radio wave absorbing element comprising: a first resonator extending in a first plane direction ([0038]: “output resonator 106”; Fig. 1C; [0044]: “output resonator (radiator) 208”; “output resonator element 222”; Figs. 2A-B); a second resonator spaced apart from the first resonator in a first direction and extending in the first plane direction ([0038]: “input resonator 102”; Fig. 1C; [0044]: “input resonator 202”; “radiator element 224”; Figs. 2A-B); a third resonator located between the first resonator and the second resonator in the first direction and configured to magnetically or capacitively connect to or electrically connect to each of the first resonator and the second resonator ([0038]: “intermediate resonator 104”; [0039]: “couplings 120, 122”; Fig. 1C; [0044]: “two intermediate resonators 204, 206”; “radiator element ... 226, 228”; Figs. 2A-B; [0060]: “the couplings are formed with vias 702, 704, 706”; Fig. 7); a reference conductor extending in the first plane direction, located between the first resonator and the second resonator in the first direction, and serving as a potential reference of the first resonator and the second resonator ([0038]: “ground plane layers”; [0041]: “adjacent ground plane 132”; Fig. 1C; [0045]: “ground planes 230, 232, 236”; Figs. 2A-B); and a shielding conductor spaced apart from the second resonator in the first direction and extending in the first plane direction ([0038]: “metallic enclosure 116, 118”; “ground plane layers”; Fig. 1C; [0045]: “bottom (lower) ground plane 234”; Figs. 2A-B), wherein the reference conductor surrounds at least a part of the third resonator in the first plane direction ([0041]: “adjacent ground plane 132”; Fig. 1C; [0045]: “ground planes 230, 232, 236”; Figs. 2A-B). Regarding Claim 2, Carceller discloses: wherein the shielding conductor is configured to shield an electromagnetic wave received by the first resonator ([0038]: The metallic enclosures provide shielding; [0043]: “In addition to providing additional shielding and ground connectivity, the outer enclosure 201 provides structural stability.”; [0045]: Ground plane 234 provides shielding). Regarding Claim 3, Carceller discloses: wherein the shielding conductor is configured to shield the electromagnetic wave radiated by the second resonator ([0038]: The metallic enclosures provide shielding; [0043]: “In addition to providing additional shielding and ground connectivity, the outer enclosure 201 provides structural stability.”; [0045]: Ground plane 234 provides shielding). Regarding Claim 4, Carceller discloses: wherein the plurality of radio wave absorbing elements are arranged in the first plane direction ([0034]; Fig. 1A). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NOAH Y. ZHU whose telephone number is (571)270-0170. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William J. Kelleher can be reached on (571) 272-7753. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NOAH YI MIN ZHU/Examiner, Art Unit 3648 /TIMOTHY A BRAINARD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591041
System and Method for Robotic Inspection
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584779
RADAR LEVEL GAUGE SYSTEM PROPAGATING MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALLY GENERATED TRANSMIT SIGNALS BY A COMMON ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12553760
MICROWAVE TRANSMISSION ARRANGEMENT WITH ENCAPSULATION, COMMUNICATION AND/OR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND RADAR LEVEL GAUGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12546859
RADAR CONTROL DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12493118
INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE RADAR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+16.7%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 60 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month