Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/553,930

ENHANCEMENTS FOR TCI ACTIVATION AND APPLICATION IN COMMON TCI OPERATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Examiner
SEFCHECK, GREGORY B
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
469 granted / 677 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
736
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 677 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority as a 371 of PCT/US2022/071540 filed 4/5/2022 and Provisional Application 63/170798 filed 4/5/2021 is acknowledged. Preliminary Amendment filed 10/4/2023 is acknowledged. Claims 1-16 have been cancelled. Claims 17-36 have been newly added and remain pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/4/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 17, 18, 21-27, and 30-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhou et al. (US20240015717A1), hereafter Zhou. Regarding claims 17, 26, and 35, Zhou discloses a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) system (Fig. 7, 700-702; paragraph 101) comprising a transceiver (Fig. 7, transceiver 722), one or more processors (Fig. 7, processors 704-706), and memory coupled with the one or more processors storing executable instructions that when executed by the one or more processors (paragraph 101) cause the one or more processors to effectuate operations of a method comprising to receive a Medium Access Control (MAC) Control Element (CE), wherein the MAC CE indicates an activation of a plurality of Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) states for a TCI codepoint (Fig. 4, paragraph 61; MAC-CE activating joint DL/UL TCI states mapped to TCI codepoint) and to receive a first Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) transmission (i.e. DCI conveyed via PDCCH) comprising the TCI codepoint (paragraphs 62-63; 1st DCI-based scheduling based on multiple sets of joint TCI states activated by MAC-CE). Zhou further shows receiving a second PDCCH transmission using first TCI states of the plurality of activated TCI states (paragraph 63; 2nd DCI applied to joint TCI states), wherein the second PDCCH transmission includes information for scheduling a Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH) transmission or a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) transmission (paragraphs 61-64 describe various examples of joint TCI state activation for PUCCH/PUSCH/PDSCH/PDCCH) with multiple transmission occasions (paragraph 65; multi-TRP where different DCIs schedule communication with different TRPs) and to transmit, by using second TCI states of the plurality of activated TCI states, the PUCCH transmission or the PUSCH transmission on the multiple transmission occasions, wherein different TCI states of the second TCI states are used in different transmission occasions of the multiple transmission occasions (paragraphs 65-67; DL- and UL-only TCI state scheme via multi-TRP DCI scheduling). Regarding claims 18, 27, and 36, Zhou discloses the first TCI states comprise a plurality of downlink (DL) TCI states (paragraph 66) and the second TCI states comprise a plurality of uplink (UL) TCI states (paragraph 67). Regarding claims 21, 22, 30, and 31, Zhou discloses the MAC CE comprises a TCI state identification field for the TCI codepoint and a number of Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) state identifiers for activation (Fig. 4; paragraph 61; BWP ID indicates the BWP for which the MAC CE applies as the codepoint and multiple TCI state ID fields). Regarding claims 23 and 32, Zhou discloses the PDCCH transmission comprises Downlink Control Information (DCI) and the DCI comprises an indication of the TCI codepoint (paragraphs 61-65; see above rejections of claims 17 and 26). Regarding claims 24 and 33, Zhou discloses the activated TCI states are activated based on a TCI activation timeline (paragraphs 40-42, 62, 75; TDM/TDD, timeslots/timing offset). Regarding claims 25 and 34, Zhou discloses first PDCCH transmission is received before one or more of the plurality of TCI states are activated (Fig. 5, steps 506-512 before step 514-516; enabling a beam indication scheme before applying that beam indication scheme to activate TCI state for UL/DL beam communication). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 19, 20, 28, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou in view of Jang et al. (US20230006727A1), hereafter Jang. Regarding claims 19 and 28, Zhou discloses first PDCCH transmission is received before one or more of the plurality of TCI states are activated, as shown above with respect to claims 25 and 34 (Fig. 5, steps 506-512 before step 514-516; enabling a beam indication scheme before applying that beam indication scheme to activate TCI state for UL/DL beam communication) but does not expressly disclose a TCI state of the plurality of TCI states is used at an activation time. Jang discloses analogous art (paragraph 227; TCI state activation via MAC CE) including a TCI state of the plurality of TCI states used at an activation time (i.e. that is signaled in advance; Fig. 6; paragraph 77-79). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time of effective filing to modify Zhou by applying a TCI state of the plurality of TCI states is used at an activation time, as shown by Jang, thereby providing preconfigured mapping of activation of plural BWPs and their corresponding TCI state. Regarding claims 20 and 29, Zhou discloses the plurality of TCI states for the TCI codepoint are associated with a control resource set (CORESET) (paragraph 45) but fails to expressly disclose a CORESET pool index value where the first PDCCH transmission is received on a CORESET associated with the CORESET pool index value. Jang discloses analogous art (paragraph 227; TCI state activation via MAC CE) including a CORESET pool index value where the first PDCCH transmission is received on a CORESET associated with the CORESET pool index value (paragraphs 206, 211, 223-232; use of CORESET poolindex value corresponding to TCI states). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time of effective filing to modify Zhou by utilizing a CORESET pool index value where the first PDCCH transmission is received on a CORESET associated with the CORESET pool index value, as shown by Jang, thereby enabling efficient beam failure recovery. Conclusion 6. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY B SEFCHECK whose telephone number is (571)272-3098. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached at 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY B SEFCHECK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604276
USER EQUIPMENT (UE) CAPABILITY SIGNALING FOR MAXIMUM POWER SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12568493
Multiple Downlink Semi-Persistent Scheduling Configurations for New Radio Internet of Things
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12513668
TECHNIQUES FOR USER EQUIPMENT (UE) PROCEDURES FOR RANDOM ACCESS CHANNEL (RACH) TYPE SELECTION AND RANDOM ACCESS RESPONSE (RAR) MONITORING IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12513615
Device for and Method of Radio Access Technology Selection Among Multiple Radio Access Technologies
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12507319
UE-TO-UE RELAY SERVICE IN 5G SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+20.0%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 677 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month