Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/554,020

APPROACHES FOR MULTI-LINK COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 05, 2023
Priority
Apr 07, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2021059048
Examiner
BLAIR, DOUGLAS B
Art Unit
2454
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
469 granted / 647 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
705
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 647 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/17/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-6, 8, 9, 21 and 25 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6, 8, 9, 21, and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted steps are: Claim 1 ends with the language “the receivers to be worken being selected by the user device”. The use of the future tense “to be woken” implies that the selection happens by the user device at some point after the method steps explicitly recited as being performed by the radio access node. Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the elements. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted elements are: Claim 21 recites an apparatus for a radio access node configured for transmission to a user device, meaning the user device is not part of the claimed apparatus. The applicant is claiming an action of selection that is attributed to the user device and therefore the user device is essential to the invention but not covered as part of the scope of the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 8, 9, and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by International Publication Number WO2020/076465 by Nam et al. As to claim 1, Nam teaches a method for a radio access node configured for transmission to a user device over multiple links, the user device having a plurality of receivers, the method comprising: responsive to data being available for transmission to the user device (paragraph 61), determining which of the multiple links are possible links for transmission of the data (paragraphs 79 and 93); selecting a plurality of links of the possible links; and transmitting a wake-up signal to the user device (step 1110), the wake-up signal including a request to wake up a number of the plurality of receivers corresponding to the selected links (paragraph 63), the receivers to be woken being selected by the user device (paragraph 105). As to claim 2, see paragraphs 32 and 61. As to claim 3, see Figure 11. As to claim 4, see Figure 11. As to claim 5, see Figure 11. As to claim 6, see Figure 9 and paragraphs 109 and 110. As to claim 8, see Figure 11, the WUS can indicate which links should be woken. As to claim 9, see paragraphs 63 and 105. As to claim 21, it is rejected for the same reasoning as claim 1. As to claim 25, see paragraph 105. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS B BLAIR whose telephone number is (571)272-3893. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Glenton Burgess can be reached at 571-272-3949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOUGLAS B BLAIR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2454
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
May 11, 2026
Response Filed
May 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Aug 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12756647
TESTING DEVICE, TESTING METHOD, AND TESTING PROGRAM
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12744713
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12672204
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING VOICE HANDOVER IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672035
NETWORK-INITIATED SLICE-BASED SESSION HANDOVER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664226
SELF-DIAGNOSING LINK STABILIZER
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+7.9%)
3y 11m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 647 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month