Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/554,199

THERAPEUTIC MODALITIES FOR INHIBITING PANCREATIC BETA CELL IMPAIRMENT AND TREATING DIABETES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 05, 2023
Priority
Apr 07, 2021 — provisional 63/171,607 +1 more
Examiner
HABTE, KAHSAY
Art Unit
1624
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1371 granted / 1612 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
74 currently pending
Career history
1650
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
63.9%
+23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1612 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1, 3-4, 8, 16, 18, 22, 25-26, 28, 32, 35-36, 38, 40-43 and 47 are pending in this application. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I and a single disclosed species of compound C1a in the reply filed on 05/08/2026 is acknowledged. PNG media_image1.png 400 655 media_image1.png Greyscale The examiner searched the elected species and it is free of prior art. The search was expanded and stopped when a prior art was found. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 16, 18 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Basak et al. WO-2008/008374 A2. Cited reference disclose at page 254 the following antidiabetic compounds that are the same as applicants (i.e. R3 = H; X1 = methyl or chloro; W = -SO2-NH; R1 = -CONR4R5 wherein R4 and R5 together with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached form a heterocyclic ring; R2 = H; and Y1 = chloro. PNG media_image2.png 255 262 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 259 244 media_image3.png Greyscale Since said compounds are the same as applicants, a 102(a)(1) rejection is proper. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3-4, 16, 18, 22, 25-26, 28, 32, 36, 38, 40-43 and 47 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention: a. Claim 1 and claims dependent thereon are rejected because the phrase “ form a ring” is indefinite. What is covered and what is not? What is the nature of the ring? Monocyclic? Polycyclic? Spirocyclic? What is the size of the ring formed? What is the nature of the ring atoms in the ring? b. Claim 16 is rejected because the claims fails to narrow down the claim limitation of claim 1. In claim 16, the phrase “wherein said compound is selective prostaglandin receptor antagonist” does not narrow down the claim limitation of the compound of claim 1. What compounds are selective prostaglandin receptor antagonists and what are not? c. In claim 18, the phrase “the diabetes is characterized by EP3 overexpression beta cells” and in claim 22 the phrase “administration is performed so as to prevent or inhibit loss of pancreatic beta cells…” lacks sufficient antecedent basis. Claims 18 and 22 depend from claim 1, but there is no mention of said phrases back in claim 1. Claims 18 and 22 appears to be duplicate of claim 1. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The chemical structures of Compounds 1a and Compound 1b at page 20 of the specification are fuzzy. The compounds should be drawn as it was done in Compound 1c. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claims 8 and 35 are objected to because of the following informalities: The chemical structures of Compounds 1a and Compound 1b are fuzzy and drawn differently from Compound 1c. It is recommended that applicants fix the chemical structures of Compound 1a and Compound 1b. PNG media_image4.png 356 989 media_image4.png Greyscale Note that Compound 1c in said claims is drawn properly (see below). PNG media_image5.png 269 487 media_image5.png Greyscale It is also recommended that applicants fix the same faded chemical structures in the specification. Appropriate correction is required. Information Disclosure Statement 9. Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement, filed on 02/23/20024 has been acknowledged. Please refer to Applicant’s copies of the 1449 submitted herewith. Conclusion 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kahsay Habte Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)272-0667. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JEFFREY MURRAY can be reached on 571-272-9023. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kahsay Habte/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1624 May 19, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2023
Application Filed
May 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679805
NOVEL BIOACTIVE SUBSTANCE EXHIBITING ANTIMALARIAL ACTIVITY, AND USE FOR SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673961
COMPOUNDS AND METHODS USEFUL FOR STABILIZING PHENYLALANINE HYDROXYLASE MUTATIONS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673940
METHODS OF MANUFACTURE AND SYNTHESIS OF FLUORESCENT DYE COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662474
FUSED RING DERIVATIVES CONTAINING 1,4-OXAZEPANE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655158
BIOMIMETIC G-QUARTET COMPOUNDS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+7.4%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1612 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month