Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/554,289

MONITORING STATE SWITCHING CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 06, 2023
Priority
Apr 09, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021086207
Examiner
MOORE JR, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
824 granted / 916 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
929
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
35.6%
-4.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 916 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/28/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4-12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20-22, and 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wei et al. (U.S. 2023/0171698) (hereinafter “Wei”) in view of Fujishiro et al. (U.S. 2024/0015850) (hereinafter “Fujishiro”). Regarding claim 1, Wei teaches the base station 110 (network device) that transmits, and the UE 120 (terminal) that receives, configuration information (reception configuration information) indicating one or more DRX (discontinuous reception mode) configurations for one or more MBMS sessions (MBS) as shown in step 505 of Figure 5A and spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]. Wei also teaches the base station 110 that transmits, and the UE 120 receives, DCI (target control information) that indicates a wakeup signal for a broadcast/multicast session in a session-specific field of the DCI as shown in step 510 of Figure 5A as well as step 610 of Figure 6, where the UE 120 selectively performs (activate or deactivate), for the broadcast/multicast session, a wakeup operation for a DRX cycle based at least in part on the wakeup signal as shown in step 620 of Figure 6 and spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0065] as well as page 8, paragraphs [0090]-[0091]; and where the UE 120 performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]. Wei does not explicitly teach “wherein the target control information comprises a target media access control layer control element (MAC CE); wherein the target control information further comprises indication information of the MBS, the indication information of the MBS comprises an MBS scheduling identifier, and the MBS scheduling identifier comprises at least one of: a dynamic scheduling identifier, wherein the dynamic scheduling identifier is a Group Radio Network Temporary Identifier (G-RNTI); or a semi-persistent scheduling identifier, wherein the semi-persistent scheduling identifier is a Semi-Persistent Scheduling Radio Network Temporary Identifier (SPS-RNTI)”. However, Fujishiro teaches a communication control method for providing a multicast broadcast service (MBS) from a base station to a user equipment where a gNB 200 (network device) transmits to a UE 100 (terminal) an indication (target control information) to individually activate or deactivate a PTP leg and a PTM leg; where a MAC entity of the gNB 200 may transmit a MAC CE including the indication to the UE 100; and where the MAC CE may include an identifier such as a G-RNTI (dynamic scheduling identifier) associated with the MBS session to be indicated as shown in step S12 of Figure 9 and spoken of on page 5, paragraphs [0095]-[0097]. Given the above references, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to apply the use of a MAC CE including an MBS scheduling identifier as taught in Fujishiro to the target control information transmission of Wei in order to allow for more dynamic control compared with a case by use of an RRC message, thereby providing a more adaptive system that may better adjust to network conditions as spoken of on page 5, paragraph [0098] of Fujishiro. Regarding claim 2, Wei further teaches the base station 110 that transmits, and the UE 120 receives, DCI (target control information) that indicates a wakeup signal for a broadcast/multicast session in a session-specific field of the DCI as shown in step 510 of Figure 5A as well as step 610 of Figure 6, where the UE 120 selectively performs (activate or deactivate), for the broadcast/multicast session, a wakeup operation for a DRX cycle based at least in part on the wakeup signal as shown in step 620 of Figure 6 and spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0065] as well as page 8, paragraphs [0090]-[0091]; and where the UE 120 performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]. Regarding claim 4, Wei further teaches the base station 110 that transmits, and the UE 120 receives, DCI (target control information) that indicates a wakeup signal for a broadcast/multicast session (MBS activated state) in a session-specific field of the DCI as shown in step 510 of Figure 5A as well as step 610 of Figure 6, where the UE 120 selectively performs (activate or deactivate), for the broadcast/multicast session, a wakeup operation for a DRX cycle based at least in part on the wakeup signal as shown in step 620 of Figure 6 and spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0065] as well as page 8, paragraphs [0090]-[0091]; and where the UE 120 performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]. Regarding claim 5, Wei further teaches the DRX configuration that is configured by RRC signaling (RRC message) as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0057]. Regarding claim 6, Wei further teaches the DRX configuration indicated by the configuration information that identifies a DRX on-duration timer, a DRX inactivity timer, a DRX scheduling cycle, a DRX scheduling offset (initial monitoring state) as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]; where the configuration information also indicates a wakeup signal configuration to be used with the DRX configuration, where the wakeup signal configuration identifies a set of wakeup monitoring occasions (for starting the MBS reception monitoring) as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0064]. Regarding claim 7, Wei further teaches the base station 110 that may transmit MBMS sessions associated with respective MBMSs (more than one MBS), and where a plurality of DRX configurations (different reception configuration information) may be used for a plurality of MBMS sessions as spoken of on page 6, paragraphs [0062]-[0063]. Regarding claim 8, Wei further teaches the DRX configuration indicated by the configuration information that identifies a DRX on-duration timer (first timer), a DRX inactivity timer, a DRX scheduling cycle (service monitoring cycle), a DRX scheduling offset, etc. as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]. Regarding claim 9, Wei teaches the base station 110 (network device) that transmits, and the UE 120 (terminal) that receives, configuration information (reception configuration information) indicating one or more DRX (discontinuous reception mode) configurations for one or more MBMS sessions (MBS) as shown in step 505 of Figure 5A and spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]; as well as the base station 110 that transmits, and the UE 120 receives, DCI (target control information) that indicates a wakeup signal for a broadcast/multicast session in a session-specific field of the DCI as shown in step 510 of Figure 5A as well as step 610 of Figure 6, where the UE 120 selectively performs (starting or stopping), for the broadcast/multicast session, a wakeup operation for a DRX cycle based at least in part on the wakeup signal as shown in step 620 of Figure 6 and spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0065] as well as page 8, paragraphs [0090]-[0091]; and where the UE 120 performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]. Wei does not explicitly teach “wherein the target control information comprises a target media access control layer control element (MAC CE); wherein the target control information further comprises indication information of the MBS, the indication information of the MBS comprises an MBS scheduling identifier, and the MBS scheduling identifier comprises at least one of: a dynamic scheduling identifier, wherein the dynamic scheduling identifier is a Group Radio Network Temporary Identifier (G-RNTI); or a semi-persistent scheduling identifier, wherein the semi-persistent scheduling identifier is a Semi-Persistent Scheduling Radio Network Temporary Identifier (SPS-RNTI)”. However, Fujishiro teaches a communication control method for providing a multicast broadcast service (MBS) from a base station to a user equipment where a gNB 200 (network device) transmits to a UE 100 (terminal) an indication (target control information) to individually activate or deactivate a PTP leg and a PTM leg; where a MAC entity of the gNB 200 may transmit a MAC CE including the indication to the UE 100; and where the MAC CE may include an identifier such as a G-RNTI (dynamic scheduling identifier) associated with the MBS session to be indicated as shown in step S12 of Figure 9 and spoken of on page 5, paragraphs [0095]-[0097]. Given the above references, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to apply the use of a MAC CE including an MBS scheduling identifier as taught in Fujishiro to the target control information transmission of Wei in order to allow for more dynamic control compared with a case by use of an RRC message, thereby providing a more adaptive system that may better adjust to network conditions as spoken of on page 5, paragraph [0098] of Fujishiro. Regarding claim 10, Wei further teaches the base station 110 that transmits, and the UE 120 receives, DCI (target control information) that indicates a wakeup signal for a broadcast/multicast session (MBS activated state) in a session-specific field of the DCI as shown in step 510 of Figure 5A as well as step 610 of Figure 6, where the UE 120 selectively performs (activate or deactivate), for the broadcast/multicast session, a wakeup operation for a DRX cycle based at least in part on the wakeup signal as shown in step 620 of Figure 6 and spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0065] as well as page 8, paragraphs [0090]-[0091]; and where the UE 120 performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]. Regarding claim 11, Wei further teaches the UE 120 that selectively performs (starting or stopping), for the broadcast/multicast session, a wakeup operation for a DRX cycle based at least in part on the wakeup signal (target control information) as shown in step 620 of Figure 6 and spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0065] as well as page 8, paragraphs [0090]-[0091]; and where the UE 120 performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal (target control information) as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]. Regarding claim 12, Wei further teaches the UE 120 that performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring started/stopped) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal (target control information) as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]; where the DRX configuration is configured by RRC signaling (RRC message) as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0057]; where the DRX configuration indicated by the configuration information identifies a DRX on-duration timer, a DRX inactivity timer, a DRX scheduling cycle, a DRX scheduling offset (initial monitoring state) as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]; where the configuration information also indicates a wakeup signal configuration to be used with the DRX configuration, and where the wakeup signal configuration identifies a set of wakeup monitoring occasions (for starting the MBS reception monitoring) as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0064]. Regarding claim 14, Wei further teaches the UE 120 that monitors the set of wakeup signal monitoring occasions 525 (target time domain position) and receives DCI in a PDCCH-WUS 535 as shown in Figure 5B and spoken of on page 8, paragraph [0074]. Regarding claim 15, Wei further teaches a session-specific field of the received DCI that is allocated two bits (bit value) for wakeup signal indication, e.g. where a wakeup signal indicates the UE to start PDCCH monitoring for the next DRX cycle using a bit value (first predefined value) of “00”, and where the wakeup signal indicates the UE to skip PDCCH monitoring in the next DRX cycle using a bit value (second predefined value) of “01” as spoken of on pages 7-8, paragraph [0073]. Regarding claim 17, Wei further teaches the DRX configuration indicated by the configuration information that identifies a DRX on-duration timer, a DRX inactivity timer, a DRX scheduling cycle, a DRX scheduling offset (predetermined offset value), etc. as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]. Regarding claim 18, Wei further teaches the UE 120 that monitors the set of wakeup signal monitoring occasions 525 (service-monitoring start position) and receives DCI in a PDCCH-WUS 535 as shown in Figure 5B and spoken of on page 8, paragraph [0074]. Regarding claim 20, Wei further teaches the base station 110 that may transmit MBMS sessions associated with respective MBMSs (more than one MBS), and where a plurality of DRX configurations (different reception configuration information) may be used for a plurality of MBMS sessions as spoken of on page 6, paragraphs [0062]-[0063]. Regarding claim 21, Wei further teaches the DRX configuration indicated by the configuration information that identifies a DRX on-duration timer (first timer), a DRX inactivity timer, a DRX scheduling cycle (service monitoring cycle), a DRX scheduling offset, etc. as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]. Regarding claim 22, Wei further teaches the DRX configuration indicated by the configuration information that identifies a DRX on-duration timer (first timer), a DRX inactivity timer, a DRX scheduling cycle, a DRX scheduling offset, etc. as spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]; where the wakeup signal indicates whether the UE 120 is to initiate an on-duration timer for a subsequent DRX cycle 530, or whether the UE 120 is not to initiate (start) an on-duration timer for one or more subsequent DRX cycles 530 as spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0073]; and where the UE 120 performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal (target control information) as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]. Regarding claim 28, Wei teaches the base station 110 (network device) that transmits, and the UE 120 (terminal) that receives, configuration information (reception configuration information) indicating one or more DRX (discontinuous reception mode) configurations for one or more MBMS sessions (MBS) as shown in step 505 of Figure 5A and spoken of on page 6, paragraph [0063]; where base station 110 of Figure 2 includes a processor 240 coupled to a memory 242. Wei also teaches the base station 110 that transmits, and the UE 120 receives, DCI (target control information) that indicates a wakeup signal for a broadcast/multicast session in a session-specific field of the DCI as shown in step 510 of Figure 5A as well as step 610 of Figure 6, where the UE 120 selectively performs (activate or deactivate), for the broadcast/multicast session, a wakeup operation for a DRX cycle based at least in part on the wakeup signal as shown in step 620 of Figure 6 and spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0065] as well as page 8, paragraphs [0090]-[0091]; and where the UE 120 performs PDCCH monitoring (reception monitoring) associated with a MBMS (MBS) session in the DRX cycle in relation to the wakeup signal as spoken of on page 9, paragraph [0084]. Wei does not explicitly teach “wherein the target control information comprises a target media access control layer control element (MAC CE); wherein the target control information further comprises indication information of the MBS, the indication information of the MBS comprises an MBS scheduling identifier, and the MBS scheduling identifier comprises at least one of: a dynamic scheduling identifier, wherein the dynamic scheduling identifier is a Group Radio Network Temporary Identifier (G-RNTI); or a semi-persistent scheduling identifier, wherein the semi-persistent scheduling identifier is a Semi-Persistent Scheduling Radio Network Temporary Identifier (SPS-RNTI)”. However, Fujishiro teaches a communication control method for providing a multicast broadcast service (MBS) from a base station to a user equipment where a gNB 200 (network device) transmits to a UE 100 (terminal) an indication (target control information) to individually activate or deactivate a PTP leg and a PTM leg; where a MAC entity of the gNB 200 may transmit a MAC CE including the indication to the UE 100; and where the MAC CE may include an identifier such as a G-RNTI (dynamic scheduling identifier) associated with the MBS session to be indicated as shown in step S12 of Figure 9 and spoken of on page 5, paragraphs [0095]-[0097]. Given the above references, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to apply the use of a MAC CE including an MBS scheduling identifier as taught in Fujishiro to the target control information transmission of Wei in order to allow for more dynamic control compared with a case by use of an RRC message, thereby providing a more adaptive system that may better adjust to network conditions as spoken of on page 5, paragraph [0098] of Fujishiro. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wei in view of Fujishiro and Liu et al. (U.S. 2022/0210766) (hereinafter “Liu”). Regarding claim 3, Wei in view of Fujishiro teaches claim 2 as described above. While Wei also teaches where the received DCI PDCCH wakeup signal is scrambled by a RNTI as spoken of on page 7, paragraph [0065], Wei does not explicitly teach “wherein the target DCI is identified by a power saving radio network temporary identification (PS-RNTI)”. However, Liu teaches a method and system for DCI monitoring for multicast/broadcast services where a base station may transmit a group-common wakeup signal (GC-WUS) in a MBS bandwidth part 405 (BWP) when the MBS BWP is inactive, dormant, or active e.g. for downlink DCI format 2_6 with group-power-saving-RNTI (G-PS-RNTI) for MBS transmissions, which may include a bitmap for multiple services or for downlink DCI format 2_6 with power-saving-RNTI (PS-RNTI), which may include a bitmap for unicast services and MBSs as spoken of on page 14, paragraph [0126]. Given the above references, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to apply a power saving RNTI as taught in Liu to the DCI transmission of Wei in view of Fujishiro in order to improve the efficiency of the communication system by using an RNTI with additional power savings as spoken of on page 14, paragraph [0126] of Liu. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to amended claim(s) 1-12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20-22, and 28 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J. MOORE, JR., whose telephone number is (571)272-3168. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (9am-4pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan A. Phillips can be reached at (571)272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL J MOORE JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 06, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 08, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745262
TECHNIQUES FOR UPDATING TRANSMISSION CONFIGURATION INDICATOR (TCI) STATES IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745198
Configuring Timing Offsets in Integrated Access Backhaul (IAB) Networks with Multiple Available Timing Modes
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12732966
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726984
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12707476
METHOD, USER EQUIPMENT, PROCESSING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR RECEIVING DOWNLINK SIGNAL, AND METHOD AND BASE STATION FOR TRANSMITTING DOWNLINK SIGNAL
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 916 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month