Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/554,698

A WATERCRAFT, AND AN ALIGNMENT STRUCTURE FOR AN ELECTRICALLY POWERED WATERCRAFT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 10, 2023
Examiner
WIEST, ANTHONY D
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ride Awake AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
635 granted / 896 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
925
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 896 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-15 are pending in the current application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 7-12 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lind et al., US 20200283102 (herein after “Lind”). Lind discloses an alignment structure (2a, 3a) for a battery pack (2) and a propulsion module (3) for a powered watercraft (figure 1), wherein the alignment structure (2a, 3a) is configured to be received in and affixed to said powered watercraft (2a, 3a are integral with the watercraft), the alignment structure (2a, 3a) comprising: - a first alignment feature (2a) configured to receive a removable battery pack (2) (the examiner considers the sides to be substantially smooth (see Fig. 2b) and that the battery pack is supported and retained against the force of gravity), and a second alignment feature (3a) configured to receive a removable propulsion module (3) for propelling the powered watercraft in a longitudinal direction, wherein the alignment structure (2a) extends along the longitudinal direction (see figures 1-3) to provide a space for the battery pack (2) and/or the propulsion module (3) (Lind discloses that the alignment features overlap in the longitudinal direction, and wherein the first alignment feature (2a) and the second alignment feature (3a) are configured for positioning and fixedly locating said battery pack (2) and said propulsion module (3) relative to each other so that said battery pack (2) and said propulsion module (3) are individually removable (2 and 3 are individually removable). The examiner considers the stepped features of the connection between the battery pack and propulsion module to constitute a mechanical interface to connect electrical contacts (see Figs. 2 and 2b). The examiner also considers the alignment structure to be rigid and to comprise heat conducting material. Regarding claim 14: the features of the first alignment feature (2a) and the second alignment feature (3a) constituting the overlapping step in allowing the battery pack (2) and propulsion module (3) to be connected are considered by the examiner to be the third and fourth alignment features for positioning and fixedly locating the first alignment part and second alignment part relative to each other. The examiner notes that the terms “feature” and “part” have no structural connotation and any point or surface on the apparatus of Lind can broadly be considered to be a “feature” or “part”. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lind et al., US 20200283102 (herein after “Lind”). Lind discloses a method of securing a removable battery pack (2) and a removable propulsion module (3) within a watercraft body (1) for a powered watercraft, such as a water-jet propelled surfboard, the method comprising the steps of: - providing a watercraft body (1) extending in a longitudinal direction and having a cavity (2a), - providing an alignment structure (2a integral with the cavity, 3a integral with the recess) comprising a first alignment feature (2a integral with the cavity)configured to receive a removable battery pack (2) and a second alignment feature (3a integral with the recess) configured to receive a removable propulsion module (3) for propelling the powered watercraft in the longitudinal direction, - positioning the alignment structure (2a integral with the cavity, 3a integral with the recess; positioned when manufactured) in the cavity (2a) so that the first alignment feature (2a) and the second alignment feature (3a) provide a space for positioning and fixedly locating a removable battery pack (2) and a removable propulsion module (3) relative to each other so that they are individually removable, and - securing (implicit) the alignment structure (2a integral with the cavity, 3a integral with the recess) to the watercraft body (1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lind in view of Kohnsen, US 10814939 (herein after “Kohnsen”). Lind discloses a watercraft (see figure 1), in particular a surfboard, comprising: a flotation body (1) having a top face (see figure 1) providing a surface for a user to stand on when using the watercraft, an opposite bottom face (figures 1-8), a front end (see figure 1), a rear end (see figure 1), a cavity (2a) opening up at said top face and a recess (3a) opening up at said bottom face, said recess (3a) extending from said rear end to said cavity (2a) (see figure 2b), a housing (2a integral with the cavity, 3a integral with the recess) connected to said flotation body (1), said housing (2a, 3a) comprising a first housing part (2a) connected to a second housing part (3a), - said first housing part (2a) being positioned in said cavity (2a integral with the first housing part) and being upwardly open for receiving a battery pack (2) at said top face, - - said battery pack (2) being for powering a propulsion unit (3) for propulsion of the watercraft, said second housing part (3a) being positioned in said recess (3a integral with the housing) and defining a downwardly and rearwardly open channel (see figures 2b and 3) of said watercraft. The examiner considers the flotation body to be molded around parts of the housings due to the integral structure of the surfboard and floatation body and the housing parts to be integrally connected permitting electrical contact of the propulsion module and the battery pack. Lind does not explicitly disclose moving the propulsion module in a direction into the open channel at the rear end and along the length of the open channel, into an operative position wherein the propulsion module may be powered by the battery pack for propulsion of the watercraft or a lock to secure the propulsion module in the operative position. The problem to be solved by the present invention may therefore be regarded as how to provide a watercraft allowing safe insertion/removal of its modules. Kohnsen discloses a surfboard where the electric drive is inserted into an open channel at the rear end and along a length of the open channel and is locked into place using screws. Although Kohnsen discloses inserting the propulsion module from above, it is clear that it is capable for the propulsion module to be longitudinally inserted from the rear end (see Fig. 4 and column 4, line 63 – column 5, line 20) which shows opposing frame sections 41a, 41b comprising tracks along the length of the open channel for supporting the propulsion module. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the apparatus of Lind by inserting the propulsion module into the open cavity from the rear end along the length of the open channels disclosed by Kohnsen and securing or locking the propulsion module in the operative position. Doing so allows easier insertion of the propulsion module either when the surfboard is on a flat surface or when the surfboard is floating on the surface of the water without the need for lifting the propulsion module vertically into the cavity of lowering the surfboard onto the propulsion module. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D WIEST whose telephone number is (571)270-5974. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:00 - 3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D WIEST/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595025
STEP APPARATUSES FOR BOATS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589836
SURGE DAMPING SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES FOR USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577942
METHODS OF SECURING A VESSEL DURING TRANSPORTATION, OFF-LOADING, AND INSTALLATION OF WIND TURBINE COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571372
FLOATING WIND TURBINE SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565296
RAPID REPLACEMENT CONTROL FIN FOR AN UNDERWATER VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.7%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 896 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month