Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/555,225

CSI REPORTING WITH SUBSET OF COEFFICIENT INDICATORS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 12, 2023
Priority
Apr 12, 2021 — provisional 63/173,996 +1 more
Examiner
ALI, SYED
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
441 granted / 534 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Strong +59% interview lift
Without
With
+59.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
566
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 534 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This action is in response to the application filed on May 26, 2026 Claims 1-20 is under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rahman et al. (US: 2021/0099211 A1) in view of Tosato et al. (US: 2020/0322028 A1). As per Claim 1 Rahman teaches a method performed by a User Equipment (“UE”), the method comprising: receiving, from a Radio Access Network (“RAN”), a codebook configuration corresponding to a port-selection codebook(Paragraph 0038, 0045 0202, 0206 the UEs 111-116 include circuitry, programing, or a combination thereof, for CSI reporting 5G communication systems, based on radio access networks (RANs), transmission and reception, where v is the rank value reported via RI, the pre-coder (cf. equation 5 and equation 5A) includes the codebook components (indicated via PMI) summarized in Table 4. The parameters L.sub.l and M.sub.l are either fixed or configured (e.g., via RRC)): receiving a set of Channel State Information (“CSI”) reference signals: identifying a set of ports based on the set of CSI reference signals (Paragraph 0219, 0223 example, the first subset (S1) of codebook components is derived (e.g., by the gNB) based on the UL channel estimated using SRS transmission from the UE, and the derived first subset (S1) is configured to the UE. The first and second subsets may be disjoint, i.e., they do not have any common codebook components. Alternatively, they may have at least one common codebook component. CSI part 1 comprising CQI, RI, and K.sub.NZ=Σ.sub.l=0.sup.v−1K.sub.NZ,l are multiplexed and encoded together in UCI part 1, where K.sub.NZ indicates the total number of NZ coefficients across v layers, and K.sub.NZ,l indicates a number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients for layer l); generating a set of coefficient indicators corresponding to the identified set of ports, wherein a subset of the coefficient indicators is assigned a non-zero amplitude value, wherein the port-selection codebook comprises a first bitmap that identifies the subset of the coefficient indicators having the non-zero amplitude value (Paragraph 0206 0223 See Table 4 and 5, a UE is configured with higher layer parameter codebookType set to ‘typeII-PortSelection-r17’ for CSI reporting based on a new (Rel. 17) Type II port selection codebook in which the port selection (which is in SD) in Rel. 15/16 Type II port selection codebook is extended to FD in addition to SDCSI part 1 comprising CQI, RI, and K.sub.NZ=Σ.sub.l=0.sup.v−1K.sub.NZ,l are multiplexed and encoded together in UCI part 1, where K.sub.NZ indicates the total number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients across v layers, and K.sub.NZ,l indicates a number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients for layer l; TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Codebook components Index Components Description 0 {a.sub.l, i}.sub.i = 0.sup.L.sup.l.sup.−1 set of selected SD beams/ports comprising columns of A.sub.l 2 {x.sub.l, i, m} bitmap indicating the indices of the non-zero (NZ) coefficients 3 SCI.sub.l an indicator indicating an index of the strongest coefficient for layer l 4 p.sub.l, r.sup.(1) reference amplitude 5 {p.sub.l, i, m} amplitudes of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap 6 {ϕ.sub.l, i, m} phases of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap): generating a CSI report based the set of CSI reference signals, wherein the CSI report comprises codebook parameters for one or more layers and further containing an indication of a size of the subset of the coefficient indicators, wherein the first bitmap is selectively included in the CSI report response to the a size of the subset of the coefficient indicators having the non-zero amplitude value (Paragraph 0224 See Table 4 and 5; CSI part 2 comprising the PMI indicating the second subset (S2) of codebook components is multiplexed and encoded together in UCI part 2. CSI reporting based on a new (Rel. 17) Type II port selection codebook in which the port selection (which is in SD) in Rel. 15/16 Type II port selection codebook is extended to FD in addition to SDCSI part 1 comprising CQI, RI, and K.sub.NZ=Σ.sub.l=0.sup.v−1K.sub.NZ,l are multiplexed and encoded together in UCI part 1, where K.sub.NZ indicates the total number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients across v layers, and K.sub.NZ,l indicates a number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients for layer l; TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Codebook components Index Components Description 0 {a.sub.l, i}.sub.i = 0.sup.L.sup.l.sup.−1 set of selected SD beams/ports comprising columns of A.sub.l 2 {x.sub.l, i, m} bitmap indicating the indices of the non-zero (NZ) coefficients 3 SCI.sub.l an indicator indicating an index of the strongest coefficient for layer l 4 p.sub.l, r.sup.(1) reference amplitude 5 {p.sub.l, i, m} amplitudes of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap 6 {ϕ.sub.l, i, m} phases of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap. ); and transmitting the CSI report to the RAN (Paragraph 222, FIG. 14, CSI reporting communication systems, based on radio access networks (RANs), the UE is further configured to use a two-part UCI to multiplex and report a CSI report). However Rahman does not explicitly disclose satisfying a predetermined threshold;. Tosato disclose satisfying a predetermined threshold (Paragraph 0072, These quantized values may correspond to the amplitude values of the coefficients exceeding the predetermined threshold except the coefficient with the largest magnitude.The UE may report the first indicator in the sequence, the sequence comprising amplitude values of the coefficients exceeding the predetermined threshold except the coefficient with the largest magnitude. Report the first indicator to the second device in a sequence comprising amplitude values of the coefficients exceeding the predetermined threshold except the coefficient with the largest magnitude, ) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Rahman with the teachings of Tosato in order to the make the system more efficient. Because when the sequence comprising amplitude values of the coefficients exceeding the predetermined threshold except the coefficient with the largest magnitude.. (see Tosato Paragraph 0118). As per Claim 2 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the first bitmap is omitted from the CSI report when all coefficients corresponding to a maximum number of configured coefficients have non-zero amplitude value (Paragraph 0108, 0122 the CSI reporting payload (bits) for part 2 is determined. In particular, the components of the second PMI i.sub.2 are reported only for the coefficients whose corresponding reported WB amplitudes are non-zero. a strongest coefficient (indicated using indicators i.sub.1,3,1 and i.sub.1,3,2); and [0109] a WB amplitude coefficient p.sub.l,i.sup.(1) (indicated using indicators i.sub.1,4,1 and i.sub.1,4,2).). As per Claim 3 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the first bitmap is omitted from the CSI report when a configured fraction of non-zero coefficients is greater than or equal to a configured threshold value (Paragraph 0122, 0222, 0287 CSI code rate is below a threshold code rate See Table 3 and 4 the CSI reporting payload (bits) for part 2 is determined. In particular, the components of the second PMI i.sub.2 are reported only for the coefficients whose corresponding reported WB amplitudes are non-zero. bitmap indicating the indices of the non-zero (NZ) coefficients 3 SCI.sub.l an indicator indicating an index (i*, m*) of the strongest coefficient for layer l 4 p.sub.l, r.sup.(1) reference amplitude 5 {p.sub.l, i, m} amplitudes of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap 6 {ϕ.sub.l, i, m} phases of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap ). As per Claim 4 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 3, wherein the configured threshold value is equal to one (Paragraph 0287 When part 2 CSI is transmitted on PUSCH with no transport block, lower priority bits are omitted until Part 2 CSI code rate is below a threshold code rate). As per Claim 5 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the first bitmap corresponds to coefficients associated with a selected set of frequency domain (“FD”) basis indices (Paragraph 0070, 0071 the input bits to produce a sequence of frequency-domain modulation symbols. Serial-to-parallel block 410 converts (i.e., de-multiplexes) the serial modulated symbols to parallel data to produce N parallel symbol streams where N is the IFFT/FFT size used in BS 102 and UE 116. Parallel-to-serial block 475 converts the parallel frequency-domain signals to a sequence of modulated data symbols. Channel decoding and demodulation block 480 demodulates and then decodes the modulated symbols to recover the original input data stream. ). As per Claim 6 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 5, wherein the first bitmap is omitted from the CSI report when a configured number of selected FD basis indices is less than a threshold amount (Paragraph 0287 When part 2 CSI is transmitted on PUSCH with no transport block, lower priority bits are omitted until Part 2 CSI code rate is below a threshold code rate). As per Claim 7 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 6, wherein the configured number of selected FD basis indices is equal to one (Paragraph 0035, 0070, 0071 the input bits to produce a sequence of frequency-domain (FD) modulation symbols. Serial-to-parallel block 410 converts (i.e., de-multiplexes) the serial modulated symbols to parallel data to produce N parallel symbol streams where N is the IFFT/FFT size used in BS 102 and UE 116. assume orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) or orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), the present disclosure can be extended to other OFDM-based transmission waveforms or multiple access schemes such as filtered OFDM (F-OFDM). Parallel-to-serial block 475 converts the parallel frequency-domain signals to a sequence of modulated data symbols. Channel decoding and demodulation block 480 demodulates and then decodes the modulated symbols to recover the original input data stream. ). As per Claim 8 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the CSI report contains separate bitmaps that indicate indices of non-zero coefficients reported for each layer corresponding to the one or more layers (Paragraph 0148, 0222 See Table 1, 3 and 4 The strongest coefficient is reported out of the K.sub.NZ non-zero (NZ) coefficients that is reported using a bitmap, where K.sub.NZ ≤K.sub.0=┌β×2LM┐<2LM and β is higher layer configured. The remaining 2LM−K.sub.NZ coefficients that are not reported by the UE are assumed to be zero. The following quantization scheme is used to quantize/report the K.sub.NZ NZ coefficients. set of FD/TD beams comprising columns of B.sub.l 4 {x.sub.l, i, m} bitmap indicating the indices of the non-zero (NZ) coefficients 5 SCI.sub.l Strongest coefficient indicator for layer l 6 {p.sub.l, i, m} amplitudes of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap 7 {ϕ.sub.l, i, m} phases of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap). As per Claim 9 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 1, wherein a size of the first bitmap is equal to a number of the identified set of ports (Paragraph 0178, 0093 supports up to 32 CSI-RS antenna ports which enable a gNB to be equipped with a large number of antenna elements (such as 64 or 128). In this case, a plurality of antenna elements is mapped onto one CSI-RS port. example, when the SD basis W.sub.1 is a port selection, then the candidate values for L or L.sub.1 include 1, and the candidate values for the number of CSI-RS ports N.sub.CSI-RS include 2. the SD ports are selected (hence reported), where this selection is according to at least one of Alt A-1 through Alt A-5. ). As per Claim 10 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 9, wherein a configured number of selected frequency domain (“FD”) basis indices is equal to two(Paragraph 0298, 0309 a set of frequency domain (FD) port selection vectors {b.sub.f}, where a port selection vector has one entry equal to 1 and remaining entries equal to 0, C2: indices of non-zero (NZ) coefficients, C3: an index of a strongest coefficient, C4: a reference amplitude, C5: amplitudes of NZ coefficients, and C6: phases of the NZ coefficients. ). As per Claim 11 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 10, wherein, for each bit in the first bitmap, a zero value of the bit corresponds to a respective non-zero coefficient corresponding to a first FD basis index being non-zero, and a one value of the bit corresponds to a respective non-zero coefficient corresponding to a second FD basis index being non-zero (Paragraph 0190, 0309 the FD/TD basis selection to similar to Alt A-1, i.e., the M.sub.l FD/TD units ports or column vectors of B.sub.l are selected by the index indices of non-zero (NZ) coefficients, C3: an index of a strongest coefficient, C4: a reference amplitude, C5: amplitudes of NZ coefficients, and C6: phases of the NZ coefficients.). As per Claim 12 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 10, further comprising identifying, for each layer corresponding to the one or more layers, a second bitmap of size equal to the configured number of selected FD basis indices, wherein the CSI report includes the second bitmap (Paragraph 0125, 0264, 0274 the bitmap(s) are partitioned into two parts, 1st part and 2nd part, that may or may not be equal in length (size), and the 1st part of the bitmap(s) is included in G1 and the 2nd part of the bitmap(s) is included in G2. the bitmap(s) are partitioned into two parts, 1.sup.st part and 2.sup.nd part, that may or may not be equal in length (size), and the 1.sup.st part of the bitmap(s) is included in G0 and the 2.sup.nd part of the bitmap(s) is included in G1.). As per Claim 13 Rahman-Tosato teaches the method of claim 12, wherein the second bitmap identifies whether coefficients corresponding to a selected FD basis index are assigned a zero amplitude value (Paragraph 0115, 0157 see table 2 and 3 each polarization, differential amplitudes p.sub.l,i,m.sup.(2) of the coefficients calculated relative to the associated polarization-specific reference amplitude and quantized to 3 bits SB amplitude coefficient p.sub.l,i.sup.(2) (which can be turned ON or OFF by RRC signaling via subbandAmplitude) indicated using indicators ). As per Claim 14 Rahman teaches a User Equipment (“UE”) apparatus comprising: at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory and configured to cause the UE to: receive, from a Radio Access Network (“RAN”), a codebook configuration for a port-selection codebook: receive a set of Channel State Information (“CSI”) reference signals(Paragraph 0038, 0045 0202, 0206 the UEs 111-116 include circuitry, programing, or a combination thereof, for CSI reporting 5G communication systems, based on radio access networks (RANs), transmission and reception, where v is the rank value reported via RI, the pre-coder (cf. equation 5 and equation 5A) includes the codebook components (indicated via PMI) summarized in Table 4. The parameters L.sub.l and M.sub.l are either fixed or configured (e.g., via RRC)): identify a set of ports based on the set of CSI reference signals(Paragraph 0219, 0223 example, the first subset (S1) of codebook components is derived (e.g., by the gNB) based on the UL channel estimated using SRS transmission from the UE, and the derived first subset (S1) is configured to the UE. The first and second subsets may be disjoint, i.e., they do not have any common codebook components. Alternatively, they may have at least one common codebook component. CSI part 1 comprising CQI, RI, and K.sub.NZ=Σ.sub.l=0.sup.v−1K.sub.NZ,l are multiplexed and encoded together in UCI part 1, where K.sub.NZ indicates the total number of NZ coefficients across v layers, and K.sub.NZ,l indicates a number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients for layer l); generate a set of coefficient indicators corresponding to the port-selection codebook, wherein a subset of the coefficient indicators is assigned a non-zero amplitude value, wherein the port-selection codebook comprises a first bitmap that identifies the subset of the coefficient indicators having the non-zero amplitude value (Paragraph 0206 0223 See Table 4 and 5, a UE is configured with higher layer parameter codebookType set to ‘typeII-PortSelection-r17’ for CSI reporting based on a new (Rel. 17) Type II port selection codebook in which the port selection (which is in SD) in Rel. 15/16 Type II port selection codebook is extended to FD in addition to SDCSI part 1 comprising CQI, RI, and K.sub.NZ=Σ.sub.l=0.sup.v−1K.sub.NZ,l are multiplexed and encoded together in UCI part 1, where K.sub.NZ indicates the total number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients across v layers, and K.sub.NZ,l indicates a number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients for layer l; TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Codebook components Index Components Description 0 {a.sub.l, i}.sub.i = 0.sup.L.sup.l.sup.−1 set of selected SD beams/ports comprising columns of A.sub.l 2 {x.sub.l, i, m} bitmap indicating the indices of the non-zero (NZ) coefficients 3 SCI.sub.l an indicator indicating an index of the strongest coefficient for layer l 4 p.sub.l, r.sup.(1) reference amplitude 5 {p.sub.l, i, m} amplitudes of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap 6 {ϕ.sub.l, i, m} phases of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap): generate a CSI report based the set of CSI reference signals, wherein the CSI report comprises codebook parameters for one or more layers and further containing an indication of a size of the subset of the coefficient indicators, wherein the first bitmap is selectively included in the CSI report based on a size of the subset of the coefficient indicators having the non-zero amplitude value(Paragraph 0224 See Table 4 and 5; CSI part 2 comprising the PMI indicating the second subset (S2) of codebook components is multiplexed and encoded together in UCI part 2. CSI reporting based on a new (Rel. 17) Type II port selection codebook in which the port selection (which is in SD) in Rel. 15/16 Type II port selection codebook is extended to FD in addition to SDCSI part 1 comprising CQI, RI, and K.sub.NZ=Σ.sub.l=0.sup.v−1K.sub.NZ,l are multiplexed and encoded together in UCI part 1, where K.sub.NZ indicates the total number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients across v layers, and K.sub.NZ,l indicates a number of non-zero (NZ) coefficients for layer l; TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Codebook components Index Components Description 0 {a.sub.l, i}.sub.i = 0.sup.L.sup.l.sup.−1 set of selected SD beams/ports comprising columns of A.sub.l 2 {x.sub.l, i, m} bitmap indicating the indices of the non-zero (NZ) coefficients 3 SCI.sub.l an indicator indicating an index of the strongest coefficient for layer l 4 p.sub.l, r.sup.(1) reference amplitude 5 {p.sub.l, i, m} amplitudes of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap 6 {ϕ.sub.l, i, m} phases of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap. ) However Rahman does not explicitly disclose satisfying a predetermined threshold;. Tosato disclose satisfying a predetermined threshold (Paragraph 0072, These quantized values may correspond to the amplitude values of the coefficients exceeding the predetermined threshold except the coefficient with the largest magnitude.The UE may report the first indicator in the sequence, the sequence comprising amplitude values of the coefficients exceeding the predetermined threshold except the coefficient with the largest magnitude. Report the first indicator to the second device in a sequence comprising amplitude values of the coefficients exceeding the predetermined threshold except the coefficient with the largest magnitude, ) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Rahman with the teachings of Tosato in order to the make the system more efficient. Because when the sequence comprising amplitude values of the coefficients exceeding the predetermined threshold except the coefficient with the largest magnitude.. (see Tosato Paragraph 0118). As per Claim 15 Rahman-Tosato teaches the UE of claim 14, wherein the first bitmap is omitted from in the CSI report when all coefficients corresponding to a maximum number of configured coefficients have non-zero amplitude value (Paragraph 0108, 0122 the CSI reporting payload (bits) for part 2 is determined. In particular, the components of the second PMI i.sub.2 are reported only for the coefficients whose corresponding reported WB amplitudes are non-zero. a strongest coefficient (indicated using indicators i.sub.1,3,1 and i.sub.1,3,2); and [0109] a WB amplitude coefficient p.sub.l,i.sup.(1) (indicated using indicators i.sub.1,4,1 and i.sub.1,4,2).). As per Claim 16 Rahman-Tosato teaches the UE of claim 14, wherein the first bitmap is omitted from the CSI report when a configured fraction of non-zero coefficients is greater than or equal to a configured threshold value (Paragraph 0122, 0222, 0287 CSI code rate is below a threshold code rate. See Table 3 and 4 the CSI reporting payload (bits) for part 2 is determined. In particular, the components of the second PMI i.sub.2 are reported only for the coefficients whose corresponding reported WB amplitudes are non-zero. bitmap indicating the indices of the non-zero (NZ) coefficients 3 SCI.sub.l an indicator indicating an index (i*, m*) of the strongest coefficient for layer l 4 p.sub.l, r.sup.(1) reference amplitude 5 {p.sub.l, i, m} amplitudes of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap 6 {ϕ.sub.l, i, m} phases of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap ).. As per Claim 17 Rahman-Tosato teaches the UE of claim 14, wherein the first bitmap corresponds to coefficients associated with a selected set of frequency domain ("FD") basis indices (Paragraph 0070, 0071 the input bits to produce a sequence of frequency-domain modulation symbols. Serial-to-parallel block 410 converts (i.e., de-multiplexes) the serial modulated symbols to parallel data to produce N parallel symbol streams where N is the IFFT/FFT size used in BS 102 and UE 116. Parallel-to-serial block 475 converts the parallel frequency-domain signals to a sequence of modulated data symbols. Channel decoding and demodulation block 480 demodulates and then decodes the modulated symbols to recover the original input data stream. ). As per Claim 18 Rahman-Tosato teaches the UE of claim 17, wherein the first bitmap is omitted from the CSI report when a configured number of selected FD basis indices is less than a threshold amount, and wherein the configured number of selected FD basis indices is equal to one (Paragraph 0035, 0070, 0071 the input bits to produce a sequence of frequency-domain (FD) modulation symbols. Serial-to-parallel block 410 converts (i.e., de-multiplexes) the serial modulated symbols to parallel data to produce N parallel symbol streams where N is the IFFT/FFT size used in BS 102 and UE 116. assume orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) or orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), the present disclosure can be extended to other OFDM-based transmission waveforms or multiple access schemes such as filtered OFDM (F-OFDM). Parallel-to-serial block 475 converts the parallel frequency-domain signals to a sequence of modulated data symbols. Channel decoding and demodulation block 480 demodulates and then decodes the modulated symbols to recover the original input data stream. ). As per Claim 19 Rahman-Tosato teaches the UE of claim 14, wherein the CSI report contains separate bitmaps that indicate indices of non-zero coefficients reported for each layer corresponding to the one or more layers (Paragraph 0148, 0222 See Table 1, 3 and 4 The strongest coefficient is reported out of the K.sub.NZ non-zero (NZ) coefficients that is reported using a bitmap, where K.sub.NZ ≤K.sub.0=┌β×2LM┐<2LM and β is higher layer configured. The remaining 2LM−K.sub.NZ coefficients that are not reported by the UE are assumed to be zero. The following quantization scheme is used to quantize/report the K.sub.NZ NZ coefficients. set of FD/TD beams comprising columns of B.sub.l 4 {x.sub.l, i, m} bitmap indicating the indices of the non-zero (NZ) coefficients 5 SCI.sub.l Strongest coefficient indicator for layer l 6 {p.sub.l, i, m} amplitudes of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap 7 {ϕ.sub.l, i, m} phases of NZ coefficients indicated via the bitmap). As per Claim 20 Rahman-Tosato teaches the UE of claim 14, wherein a size of the first bitmap is equal to a number of the identified set of ports (Paragraph 0178, 0093 supports up to 32 CSI-RS antenna ports which enable a gNB to be equipped with a large number of antenna elements (such as 64 or 128). In this case, a plurality of antenna elements is mapped onto one CSI-RS port. example, when the SD basis W.sub.1 is a port selection, then the candidate values for L or L.sub.1 include 1, and the candidate values for the number of CSI-RS ports N.sub.CSI-RS include 2. the SD ports are selected (hence reported), where this selection is according to at least one of Alt A-1 through Alt A-5). Response to Argument(s) Applicant's argument(s) filed on May 26, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. All arguments are moot in view of the new ground of rejection. Examiner’s Note Examiner is open for discussion if the applicant’s representative need further clarifications. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SYED ALI whose telephone number is (571)270-3681. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Asad Nawaz can be reached on 571-272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov . Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SYED ALI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 12, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701568
SCHEDULE GAP FOR MULTI-SIM USER EQUIPMENT
4y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701405
USER EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY NUMBER DEFINED IN MACHINE LEARNING LIMIT
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701147
VOICE CALL METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND CHIP SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696126
NETWORK COMMUNICATION THROUGH A HOST DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12672149
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+59.1%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 534 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month