Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/555,468

HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVE INHIBITOR AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND APPLICATION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 13, 2023
Examiner
SHOWALTER, ALEXANDER KEITH
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Jiangsu Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
37 granted / 69 resolved
-6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +52% interview lift
Without
With
+51.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
115
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§112
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 69 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority The present Application, filed June 22, 2023, is a national stage entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2022/088466, filed April 22, 2022, which claims priority to Chinese Patent Application Nos. CN202210072358, CN202110926676, CN202110653169, and CN202110443582, filed January 21, 2022, August 12, 2021, June 11, 2021 and April 23, 2021, respectively. Status of the Claims In the amendment filed October 13, 2023, claim 21 is canceled and new claims 23-24 are added. Claims 2-18 and 20 are amended. Claims 1-20 and 22-24 are currently pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs), two in total, submitted on October 13, 2023 and March 5, 2024 are acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, and 8-11 are anticipated by Stachel: Claims 1, 5, and 8-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by German Patent No. DE1190466 to Stachel (hereinafter, “Stachel”). Claim 1 recites a compound of formula (I) PNG media_image1.png 138 346 media_image1.png Greyscale where the variable moieties are as defined. Stachel teaches a process for the preparation of piperazine derivatives having a general formula PNG media_image2.png 122 351 media_image2.png Greyscale where R can be any of several moieties, such as aryl (claim 1). Several working examples of Stacher are within the scope of instant claim 1, such as example 4,1-[1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-naphthyl-(2')]-4-(o-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine (note that in an obsolete nomenclature, Stachel puts prime symbols on the four saturation sites of the naphthyl group, but it is clear from the disclosure, including the line drawing of the general formula, that this Example is as named above and drawn below): PNG media_image3.png 149 264 media_image3.png Greyscale This is a compound of instant formula (I), where ring A is phenyl, ring B is cyclohexyl, Ring C is piperazinyl, and ring D is phenyl; L1, L2, and L3 are each a bond; Ra, Rb, and Rc are each hydrogen; and R1 is methoxy. With respect to claim 5, instant ring C in the compound of Stachel is piperazinyl, the first alternative of claim 5. With respect to claims 8-11, each Ra, Rb, Rc, and Rd, respectively in the compound of Stachel is hydrogen. Claims 1-2, 5-12, 19-20, and 22-24 are anticipated by Brown: Claims 1-2, 5-12, and 19-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 8,669,249 to Brown et al. (hereinafter, “Brown”). Brown teaches compounds of a generic formula for use as Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors PNG media_image4.png 134 183 media_image4.png Greyscale where the variable moieties are as defined (col. 15, line 39 through col. 17, line 38). Among a substantial number of specific, real examples, Brown teaches 6-((4-(4-Fluorophenyl)-5,6-dihydropyridin-1(2H)-yl)methyl)-2-methyl-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazin-3(4H)one (compound 33; col. 71, line 47 through col. 71, line 2). PNG media_image5.png 145 287 media_image5.png Greyscale Brown compound 33 is a compound of instant claim 1, where ring A is heterocyclo and Ra is oxo and methyl (alkyl); ring B is aryl and Rb is hydrogen; L1 is -(CH2)1-; ring C is heterocyclyl and Rc is hydrogen; L2 is a bond; ring D is aryl and Rd is hydrogen; and L3 is a bond and R1 is hydrogen. Brown compound 33 is a compound of claim 2 [formula (III)] PNG media_image6.png 162 312 media_image6.png Greyscale where M5 is -CR6R7-O- with R6 and R7 being methyl and H; M6 is CH and Rb is hydrogen; L1 is -(CH2)1-; M1 and M2 are N, Rc is hydrogen, n5 and n6 are each one, and the variable bond is single; L2 is -(CH2)1-; ring D is aryl (phenyl) and Rd is hydrogen; and L3 is a bond and R1 is hydrogen. With respect to claim 5, depending from claim 1, ring C of compound 33 of Brown is piperazinyl, the first listed option in claim 5. With respect to claim 6, ring D of compound 33 of Brown is phenyl, a C6-10 aryl. With respect to claim 7, R1 of compound 33 of Brown is hydrogen. While this claim specifies alternatives for different variable groups when present (e.g. R11, R22, R33, R44, R55, and R66, the claim does not require them to be present. With respect to claim 8, instant Ra of compound 33 of Brown is oxo and methyl (alkyl). With respect to claim 9, instant Rb of compound 33 of Brown is hydrogen. With respect to claim 10, instant Rc of compound 33 of Brown is hydrogen. With respect to claim 11, instant Rd of compound 33 of Brown is hydrogen. Claim 12 recites a compound of formula (VII) PNG media_image7.png 120 266 media_image7.png Greyscale which is highly similar to formula (III) of claim 2, except that ring D is required to be aryl or heteroaryl and L3 is required to be carbonyl. As such, compound 33 of Brown is nearly a compound of claim 12, except that it lacks the required carbon at M1 and carbonyl moiety at L3. However, Brown further teaches compounds, such as methyl 4-(1-((2-methyl-3-oxo-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazin-7-yl)methyl)piperidin-4-yl)benzoate (compound 207; col. 144, lines 35-58) PNG media_image8.png 313 296 media_image8.png Greyscale that are within the scope of claim 12. Compound 207 of Brown is identical to compound 33 except that ring C is piperidinyl rather than piperazinyl and it includes a methyl formate group at the para position of the ring D. As such, compound 207 is a compound of instant claim 12, where M5 is -CR6R7-O- with R6 and R7 being methyl and H; M6 is CH and Rb is hydrogen; L1 is -(CH2)1-; M1 is CH and M2 is N, Rc is hydrogen, n5 and n6 are each one, and the variable bond is single; L2 is -(CH2)1-; M3 and M4 are CH and Rd is hydrogen; and R1 is methoxy (C1-6 alkoxy). With respect to claim 19, Brown discloses a reductive amination involving 1-phenylpiperazine to prepare compound 33 (col. 71, lines 38-39). Phenylpiperazine is a compound of instant claim 19, where M1 and M2 are N, n5 and n6 are each one, Rc is hydrogen, L2 is a bond, ring D is phenyl and Rd is hydrogen, L3 is a bond, and R1 is hydrogen. With respect to claim 20, Brown teaches compositions (pharmaceutical compositions) comprising a disclosed PARP inhibitor and a pharmaceutical excipient (col. 34, line 66 through col. 35, line 4). With respect to claims 22-23, Brown teaches a method of treating a disease state for which PARP possesses activity that contributes to the symptomology or pathology of the disease state, the method comprising administering a disclosed PARP inhibitor to a subject (col. 30, lines 31-39). Brown further teaches that the disease state can be cancer, such as breast cancer (col. 30, lines 39-60). With respect to claim 24, in compound 207 of Brown, each of R2-R9 is either hydrogen (R4, R5, R6) or methyl (R7) or absent (R8, R9). Claims 1-11, 18-20, and 22-24 are anticipated by Packer: Claims 1-11, 18-20, and 22-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by International Patent Application No. WO2021/013735 to Packer et al. (hereinafter, “Packer”). Packer discloses PARP inhibitors of a Formula (I) PNG media_image9.png 154 363 media_image9.png Greyscale where the variable groups are as defined (pg. 2, lines 13-25). In a working example, Packer teaches 5-[4-[(7-ethyl-6-oxo-5H-1.5-naphthyridin-3-yl)methyl]piperazin-1-yl]-N-methyl-pyridine-2-carboxamide (Example 4 – pg. 15, line 36 through pg. 16, line 5), PNG media_image10.png 114 258 media_image10.png Greyscale Example 4 is a compound of instant claims 1 and 2. For example, with respect to claim 2, M5 is -CR6R7-CR8R9- with R6 being ethyl and R7-R9 being H; M6 is N and Rb is hydrogen; L1 is -(CH2)1-; M1 and M2 are N, Rc is hydrogen, n5 and n6 are each one, and the variable bond is single; L2 is -(CH2)1-; ring D is aryl (phenyl) and Rd is hydrogen; and L3 is a bond and R1 is hydrogen. Claim 3, depending from claim 1, recites compounds of the narrower formula (II) PNG media_image11.png 157 267 media_image11.png Greyscale where the variable groups are as defined. Packer Example 4 is a species of formula (II) where Ra is ethyl; Rb is hydrogen; L1 is CH2; ring C is piperazyl and Rc is hydrogen; Rd is hydrogen; L3 is -(CH2)nC(O)NRaa(CH2)n1- where n is zero, Raa is hydrogen, and n1 is one; and R1 is hydrogen (other of the assorted definitions could be used to arrive at the same result). Claim 4, depending from claim 1, recites compounds of the narrower (relative to the formula of claim 1) formula (IV) PNG media_image12.png 119 252 media_image12.png Greyscale Packer Example 4 is a species of formula (IV) where Ra is ethyl; Rb, Rc, and Rd are hydrogen; M1 is N; ring D is pyridyl; L3 is -(CH2)nC(O)NRaa(CH2)n1- where n is zero, Raa is hydrogen, and n1 is one; and R1 is hydrogen. With respect to claim 5, depending from claim 1, ring C of Packer Example 4 is piperazinyl, the first listed option in claim 5. With respect to claim 6, ring D of Packer Example 4 is pyridyl, a C5-10 heteroaryl. With respect to claim 7, R1 of Packer Example 4 is hydrogen. While this claim specifies alternatives for different variable groups when present (e.g. R11, R22, R33, R44, R55, and R66, the claim does not require them to be present. With respect to claim 8, instant Ra of Packer Example 4 of Brown is ethyl (alkyl). With respect to claim 9, instant Rb of Packer Example 4 is hydrogen. With respect to claim 10, instant Rc of Packer Example 4 is hydrogen. With respect to claim 11, instant Rd of Packer Example 4 is hydrogen. Claim 18 recites a method for preparing a compound of formula (III) – i.e. claim 2. The method comprises reacting compounds of formulae (III-1) and (III-2) to produce a compound of formula (III): PNG media_image13.png 94 539 media_image13.png Greyscale where X is a halogen. As discussed above, Example 4 of Packer is a compound of formula (III). Packer further teaches reacting 7-(chloromethyl)-3-ethyl-1H-1,5-naphthyridin-2-one (Intermediate 17) with N-methyl-5-piperazin-1-yl-pyridine-2-carboxamide (Intermediate 13) to produce Example 4 (pg. 15, line 36 through pg. 16, line 20). PNG media_image14.png 114 603 media_image14.png Greyscale This is an instance of the method of claim 18. With respect to claim 19, Packer teaches various intermediates, such as intermediate 13 (reaction scheme at top of pg. 14), which is a compound of claim 19. With respect to claim 20, Packer teaches a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a disclosed PARP inhibitor and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, excipient, or inert carrier. (pg. 2, lines 26-28). With respect to claims 22-23, Packer teaches a method of treating diseases or conditions in which inhibition PARP1 is beneficial, comprising administering to a patient in need thereof an effective amount of a disclosed compound and further teaches that the disease state can be cancer, such as breast cancer (pg. 3, lines 7-121). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER K SHOWALTER whose telephone number is (571)270-0610. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 am to 5:00 pm, eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey S Lundgren can be reached on (571) 272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER K. SHOWALTER/Examiner, Art Unit 1629 /JEFFREY S LUNDGREN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 13, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590065
LEVORPHANOL PRODRUGS AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING AND USING THEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583884
3beta-(benzyloxy)-17alpha-methyl-pregn-5-en-20-one for use in the treatment of cognitive disorders
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582634
SYNTHETIC METHODS FOR PREPARATION OF 4-(2-CHLORO-4-METHOXY-5-METHYLPHENYL)-N-[(1S)-2-CYCLOPROPYL-1-(3-FLUORO-4-METHYLPHENYL)ETHYL]-5-METHYL-N-PROP-2-YNYL-1,3-THIAZOL-2-AMINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12528794
A NOVEL MAO-B INHIBITOR DRG-MAOB-1 FOR USE IN TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12479866
BORON-CONTAINING RHO KINASE INHIBITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+51.6%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 69 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month