Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/555,979

CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Priority
Jun 17, 2021 — JP 2021-100634 +1 more
Examiner
HINZE, LEO T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyo Electric Mfg Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
408 granted / 773 resolved
-7.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
792
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 773 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 2, line 4, “the neutral” lacks a proper antecedent basis; In claim 2, line 4, “the other” lacks a proper antecedent basis; Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the definition of the x and y axes is indefinite, because the automobile is not part of the chassis dynamometer apparatus, and because the drive wheel connecter is not disclosed, so it is not clear where the automobile would connect to the chassis dynamometer apparatus. Further regarding claim 1, the limitation “the tilting support comprises a tilting shaft projecting from each of leg portions suspended at both ends in the x-axis direction of the load motor and extending in the x-axis direction” in lines 15-16 makes the scope of the claim indefinite, because it is not clear which both ends of which component are suspended, and it is not clear how the both ends are suspended, or what the both ends are suspended from. Further regarding claim 1, the claim is indefinite because it is not clear how a single “a first bearing” is capable of rotatably supporting each of the tilting shafts, as the tilting shafts are shown at opposite ends of the assembly in Fig. 1. Regarding claim 2, the scope of the claim is indefinite because the claim recites “each of the return devices” in lines 1-2. However, only a single “first return device,” which makes it unclear why claim 2 would refer to a plurality of return devices. Further regarding claim 2, the scope of the claim is indefinite because the use of ‘(s)’ to indicate a possibility of a plurality of certain components makes it unclear how many of each component exists, and which components are related to each other. For example, the claim recites “an elastic member” in line 6, and then recites that single elastic member is interposed between each of the first inclined pieces and each of the second inclined pieces. However, it appears that there are two corresponding pairs of first inclined pieces and second inclined pieces, at each end of the chassis dynamometer, and a single elastic member would not be capable of being interposed between all of the included inclined pieces. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, but would appear to possibly be allowable if the rejections were overcome. Claim 2 is also objected to, which objects would need to be overcome to make claim 2 allowable. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the claim is deemed to be directed to a nonobvious difference over US 20210215573 A1. Claim 1 recites a tilting support disposed under the load motor and supporting the load motor so as to be tiltable, the tilting support comprises a tilting shaft projecting from each of leg portions suspended at both ends in the x-axis direction of the load motor and extending in the x-axis direction; a first bearing for rotatably supporting each of the tilting shafts, the first bearing being provided at the mounting frame; and a first return device for returning the tilted load motor to the neutral attitude, and wherein the rotary support comprises a rotary shaft suspended at a central portion in both the x-axis direction and the y-axis direction of the mounting frame; and a second bearing suspended at a central portion in both the x-axis direction and the y-axis direction of the movable table, so as to optimize the operation of the dynamometer. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20210215573 A1 discloses in the chassis dynamometer apparatus, a pedestal contains a mounting frame on which a load motor is mounted, and a base under the mounting frame. Provided that a longitudinal direction of a vehicle is an x-axis direction and a width direction of the vehicle is a y-axis direction, a first movable mount(s) slidable in one side of the x-axis or y-axis direction, a second movable stand slidable in the other side of the x-axis or y-axis direction, and a spherical joint tiltable and rotatable in an arbitrary direction are connected in series between the mounting frame and the base. US 20210215573 A1 does not appear to disclose a tilting section having tilting shafts, bearings, and returning devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEO T HINZE whose telephone number is (571)272-2864. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9-2. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Meier can be reached on (571)272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEO T HINZE/ Patent Examiner AU 2853 27 July 2026 /STEPHEN D MEIER/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12722924
CONVERTING MACHINE WITH INVERSION TRANSFER MODULE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12693634
METHOD FOR UNIFYING TIME IN WIDE AREA OF SPACE, SPACE TIME-KEEPING SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693272
DOOR FAULT IDENTIFICATION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686203
IMAGE REGISTRATION IN A CAN DECORATOR
7y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687845
CONDITION MONITORING SYSTEM AND DATA ANALYZER
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+10.6%)
3y 2m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 773 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month