Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/556,178

GPR35 Agonist Compounds

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 19, 2023
Priority
Apr 23, 2021 — GB 2105846.6 +1 more
Examiner
HSU, GRACE CHING
Art Unit
1627
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Nxera Pharma UK Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
31 granted / 41 resolved
+15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
63
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 41 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status This Non-Final Office Action is in response to the October 19, 2023 Preliminary Amendment and corresponding documents in the above-identified application Claims 1-3, 6-10, 12-20, 22-25 and 27-33 are pending, claims 7, 9, 12,13, 15, 22-25 and 27 are currently amended, claims 1-3, 6, 8, 10, 14, 16-18 and 28-33 are original and claims 4, 5, 11. 21, 26 are cancelled in the above-identified application. Priority U.S. Pat. Appln. No.18/556,178, Filed: October 19, 2023 is a 371 Nat.’ l Stage Entry of WO 2022/224212A1 (i.e., PCT/IB2022/053772, Intern.’ l Filing Date: April 22, 2022), which claims foreign priority to GB 2105846.6, Filed: April 23, 2021. Information Disclosure Statement Two (2) Information Disclosure Statements (IDS) submitted on December 30, 2024 and October 19, 2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, Information Disclosure Statements have been considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 22-25 and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant(s)), regards as the invention. In particular, claim 22 is rejected for lacking clarity and for being vague, ambiguous and indefinite for recitation of term “conditions” or “visceral conditions” as associated with the following phrases: “gastrointestinal disorders or conditions”; “symptoms of pain associated with gastrointestinal diseases or other visceral conditions”; and “pulmonary diseases or conditions” diseases; and for not distinguishing between: broad and non-specific terms (i.e., could mean any GI-related or pulmonary related state, from a transient symptom to a severe disease, without defining the scope) diseases vs conditions GI/Pulmonary Condition A broader term for any state of health affecting the GI or pulmonary system, regardless of whether it is disease or disorder. Visceral Condition A condition affecting the internal organs (viscera) of the GI or pulmonary systems, often involving visceral pain, motility, or function. Lacking structural or functional specificity (i.e., unlike a named disorder, it does not describe a particular pathological process, making it impossible to determine the exact scope of the claimed invention). Failing to define the boundaries (i.e., could cover multiple distinct diseases, each with different diagnostic, treatment, and functional impacts, without narrowing to a particular embodiment). Such that the claims defined indeterminate phrases and definitions that fail to provide a clear, precise, and enabling definition, such that the metes and bounds of the claims cannot be determined with reasonable certainty by a person of ordinary skill in art. Accordingly, claim 22 should be rewritten to incorporate the specific definitions of claims 23 to 25, while drawing distinctions between diseases vs conditions as supported by the actual specification or simply amending the claim to remove all terms that recited “conditions” . Claim 23 recite examples of a broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) , which may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claim 23 recites: the broad recitation and the narrower statement of the range/limitation A mast cell related disorders mast cell activation syndrome, clonal mast cell disorder, monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome, idiopathic urticaria, idiopathic anaphylaxis), B infectious diarrhea Clostridium difficile, Salmonella, Shigella toxin Appropriate correction is required accordingly. 2, 3 & 4. Nature Of The Invention, State of the Art and Predictability In The Art. ALLOWABLE SUBJECT MATTER The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 1-3, 6-10, 12-20, 22-25 and 27 contain allowable subject matter; i.e., as NO prior art was found in the above-identified application. over the prior art. CONCLUSION Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to GRACE C HSU whose telephone number is (571) 270-1689. The Examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30 am - 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicants is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Kortney L. Klinkel can be reached on 571-270-5239. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /G.C.H./ Examiner, Art Unit 1627 /Kortney L. Klinkel/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630530
FGFR INHIBITOR COMPOUND AND USE THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12611410
Emulsion, Injection Agent, and Emulsion Preparation Method
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599593
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING NON-ERK MAPK PATHWAY INHIBITOR-RESISTANT CANCERS
4y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590084
OXADIAZOLE HDAC6 INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576082
METTL16 INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF
4y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.6%)
3y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 41 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month