Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/556,363

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Oct 20, 2023
Examiner
MCDOWELL, JR, MAURICE L
Art Unit
2612
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
790 granted / 913 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
936
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 913 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Claims 1 and 5-18 are pending; claims 1, 5-16 and 18 are allowed. The examiner has removed the objection to the title of the invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claim 17 is directed to an information processing method with the steps of controlling, determining, setting and switching, which amounts to software instructions, software instructions are non-statutory under 35 U.S.C. 101. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 5-16 and 18 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 1, the prior art doesn’t teach: determine, based on the viewpoint information of the user and the position information of the virtual object, that the virtual object is a target of a switching operation of a display format in the virtual space; determine, based on the position information of the virtual object, that the virtual object exists in the first region; set, based on the determination that the virtual object exists in the first region, the virtual object as the target of the switching operation of the display format in the virtual space; Regarding claim 18, the prior art doesn’t teach: determining, based on the viewpoint information of the user and the position information of the virtual object, that the virtual object is a target of a switching operation of a display format in the virtual space; determining, based on the position information of the virtual object, that the virtual object exists in the first region; setting, based on the determination that the virtual object exists in the first region, the virtual object as the target of the switching operation of the display format in the virtual space; Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAURICE L MCDOWELL, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-3707. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 2pm-10pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Said A. Broome can be reached at 571-272-2931. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAURICE L. MCDOWELL, JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Sep 12, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §101
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598281
CONTROL APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DETERMINING A CAMERA PATH INDICATING A MOVEMENT PATH OF A VIRTUAL VIEWPOINT IN A THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12579741
DETECTING THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) CHANGES BASED ON MULTI-VIEWPOINT IMAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12561905
Optimizing Generative Machine-Learned Models for Subject-Driven Text-to-3D Generation
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12536756
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING PERSPECTIVE VIEWS OF AUGMENTED REALITY VIRTUAL OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12525012
AUGMENTED, VIRTUAL AND MIXED-REALITY CONTENT SELECTION & DISPLAY FOR REAL ESTATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 913 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month