Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/557,270

BATTERY SYSTEM AND HULL ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 25, 2023
Examiner
POLAY, ANDREW
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
A P Møller - Maersk A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
654 granted / 881 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
923
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 881 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8-10, 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Jeong (KR-20180113377-A). Regarding Claim1, Jeong discloses a battery system for a marine vessel, the marine vessel comprising a hull (See F1g. 1), the battery system comprising: a flow battery comprising an ion exchange element (stack, 130); and a first ballast tank (Element 110) for location in the hull and defining a first ballast tank chamber for storing electrolyte for the flow battery. Regarding Claim 2, Jeong discloses a battery system of claim 1, comprising a first feed conduit through which the electrolyte is flowable from the first ballast tank chamber to the ion exchange element. (page 4 of translation provided by Examiner) Regarding Claim 3, Jeong discloses a battery system of claim 2 comprising: a second ballast tank for location in the hull and defining a second ballast tank chamber for storing electrolyte for the flow battery; and a first conduit (Element 121 Fig. 5) arrangement through which electrolyte is flowable from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber. Regarding Claim 4, Jeong discloses a battery system of claim 3, wherein the first conduit arrangement comprises the first feed conduit and a second feed conduit (Element 156, Fig. 5.), and wherein the ion exchange element (Element 130) is fluidically connected or connectable to the first and second ballast tank chambers by the respective first and second feed conduits. Regarding Claim 5, Jeong discloses the battery system of claim 3, wherein the first conduit arrangement comprises a first transfer conduit configured so that electrolyte is flowable from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber without passing through the ion exchange element. (Fig. 5., Element 121) Regarding Claim 6, Jeong discloses the battery system of claim 3, comprising a first flow moving device operable to move electrolyte along the first conduit arrangement from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber. (Element 156) Regarding Claim 8, Jeong discloses the hull assembly for a marine vessel, the hull assembly comprising a hull and the battery system of claim 3, wherein the first ballast tank is located in the hull. (See Fig. 1.) Regarding Claim 9, Jeong discloses the hull assembly of claim 8, wherein the second ballast tank is located in the hull, and wherein the first and second ballast tanks are located at opposite lateral sides of the hull or at opposite longitudinal ends of the hull. (See Fig. 1.) Regarding Claim 12, Jeong discloses the method of changing an attitude of a marine vessel, the marine vessel comprising a hull, a flow battery, and first and second ballast tank chambers in the hull, the method comprising moving electrolyte for the flow battery from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber. (See rejection of Claim 1 above.) Regarding Claim 13, Jeong discloses the method of claim 12, wherein the flow battery comprises an ion exchange element, and the method comprises moving electrolyte for the flow battery from one or both of the first and second ballast tank chambers to the ion exchange element and back to the respective one or both of the first and second ballast tank chambers, to charge and/or discharge the electrolyte. (See Fig. 3.) Regarding Claim 14, Jeong discloses the method of claim 13, wherein the moving electrolyte for the flow battery from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber comprises moving, using a first flow moving device, the electrolyte from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber via a transfer conduit that is configured so that electrolyte is flowable from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber without passing through the ion exchange element. (See Fig. 5.) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7, 11, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Jeong (KR-20180113377-A). Regarding Claim 7, Jeong discloses the battery system of claim 3, wherein the first conduit arrangement is configurable such that electrolyte is flowable from one of the first and second ballast tank chambers to the other of the first and second ballast tank chambers via valve (Element 122, Fig 5) but does not explicitly disclose via the ion exchange element. (It’s arguably implicitly disclosed in the text, but a 103 makes the logic a PHOSITA uses when reading the disclosure more explicit since Fig. 5. leaves out elements.) Jeong discloses wherein ballast controller 140 controls the flow of the electrolyte via the ion exchange element in order to adjust the balance of the hull (top of page 4) and the controller moves the electrolyte amongst the first plurality of tanks in order to control the balance of the hull (middle of page 6.) It would have been obvious at the time of filing for a person of ordinary skill in the marine art to add conduit in order to move ballast between tanks via the ion exchange member which can be accomplished with a reasonable expectation of success. The motivation to modify Jeong is to improve the balancing function of the ballast control when using the membrane by incorporating the plurality of tanks. Regarding Claim 10, Jeong discloses the hull assembly of claim 8, a flow battery, but does not explicitly disclose comprising more than one flow battery. It would have been obvious at the time of filing for a person of ordinary skill in the marine art to add a second flow battery as a multiplicity of parts which can be accomplished with a reasonable expectation of success. The motivation to provide a second flow battery is to provide for additional flexibility in ballasting and maintenance. Regarding Claim 15, Jeong discloses the method of claim 13, wherein the moving electrolyte for the flow battery from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber comprises moving the electrolyte from the first ballast tank chamber to the second ballast tank chamber via the ion exchange element. (See rejection Claim 7 above.) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW POLAY whose telephone number is (408)918-9746. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joe Morano can be reached at 5712726684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW POLAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615 20 Feb 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 06, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589833
VENTILATION DRUG REDUCTION DEVICE AND MARINE VENTILATION DRUG REDUCTION SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589847
BIOMIMETIC AQUATIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589848
Hydrogen Transport Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582886
SWIM TRAINING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565294
ADJUSTABLE ELECTRONICS MOUNTING PLATFORM AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 881 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month