Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/557,515

CONNECTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INSTALLING SUCH A CONNECTION DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Oct 26, 2023
Priority
Apr 29, 2021 — DE 10 2021 111 100.5 +1 more
Examiner
FIGUEROA, FELIX O
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Weidmüller Interface GmbH & Co. KG
OA Round
2 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
534 granted / 920 resolved
-10.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
975
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
79.0%
+39.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.84(h)(1). When an exploded view is shown in a figure which is on the same sheet as another figure, the exploded view should be placed in brackets. See Figures 4a, 4b, 5a, 5b, 6e, and 6f. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The abstract is objected because it is too long. The abstract should be within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. Claim Objections Claims 17, 34 and 35 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claims 17 and 34, the use of parenthesis makes unclear whether the text inside the parenthesis is part of the claim language or no. In claim 34 line 4, “an electrical conductor” should be --the electrical conductor--, per line 2. In claim 35 lines 1-2 , “an actuation space” should be --the actuation space--, per claim 35. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 17-29, 31-32, 34 and 35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oesterhaus (US 7,104,833). Regarding claim 17, Oesterhaus discloses a connection device comprising at least one direct-plug-in clamping connection having a direct-plug-in design for plugging in an electrical conductor, the at least one direct-plug-in clamping connection having at least one of a clamping spring (12), a busbar and a clamping cage (2), wherein the clamping spring is designed to clamp the electrical conductor plugged into the direct-plug-in clamping connection to form an electrically conductive contact with the busbar or the clamping cage (2), the at least one direct-plug-in clamping connection further having an actuation mechanism (15) movable between a base position (Fig. 2) and an actuation position (Fig. 3) for moving the clamping spring to release the electrical conductor, the actuation mechanism having at least two actuation regions (16, 17) for an actuation tool, the at least two actuation regions arranged at an angle (a) > 0 relative to each other, wherein the actuation mechanism rotates about an axis which moves between a first position and a second position (rotationally) when the actuation mechanism is moved between the base position and the actuation position, respectively. Please also note that Oesterhaus shows enough space to allow some translation of 23. Regarding claim 18, Oesterhaus discloses the actuation mechanism displaced along a guide (22 or lateral walls around 19) when moved between the base position and the actuation position. Regarding claim 19, Oesterhaus discloses the guide having an arcuate shape (at 22) generally corresponding to the position of the changing rotational point. Regarding claim 20, Oesterhaus discloses the actuation mechanism having a mating guide (outer surface of 23) having a design that corresponds to the profile of the guide. Regarding claim 21, Oesterhaus discloses the guide and first mating guide include a groove (at 22) and bar (at 23), respectively, or the guide and first mating guide include a bar and groove, respectively. Regarding claim 22, Oesterhaus discloses the actuation mechanism having an arcuate profile being generally sickle shaped (fig. 2). Regarding claim 23, Oesterhaus discloses the actuation mechanisms having a clamping end (end of 19) which when actuated rests against and pushes the clamping spring into a releasing position (Fig .3) from a clamping position against a restoring force of the clamping spring. Regarding claim 24, Oesterhaus discloses the actuation mechanism pushed back into the base position from the actuation position by the restoring force of the clamping spring, wherein the clamping spring pushes the mating guide against the guide in the base position. Regarding claim 25, Oesterhaus discloses the first actuation region (16) arranged between an actuation end and a clamping end opposite the actuation end and the second actuation region (17) arranged at the actuation end of the actuation mechanism. Regarding claim 26, Oesterhaus discloses the actuation mechanism arranged in an actuation space externally accessible through first and second actuation apertures, the first actuation region being accessible through the first actuation aperture and the second actuation region being accessible through the second actuation aperture (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 27, Oesterhaus discloses one of the actuation regions arranged on an upper side of the actuation mechanism (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 28, Oesterhaus discloses the direct-plug-in clamping connection having a stop and the actuation mechanism has a counter stop (25) arranged to interact with the stop, the stop and counter stop being provided to secure the actuation mechanism in the actuation space (intended use). Regarding claim 29, Oesterhaus discloses the connection device is a series connection (intended use) having at least one direct-plug-in clamping connection. Regarding claim 31, Oesterhaus discloses a method of installing a connection device according to claim 1 comprising the steps of, installing the clamping spring (8) in the housing (1) and installing the actuation mechanism (15) for releasing an electrical conductor clamped in the connection device with the clamping spring by inserting it into the connection device through an actuation aperture, wherein the actuation mechanism is actuated via the actuation aperture when the connection device is installed and the clamping spring clamps the actuation mechanism in the connection device when inserted in a base position. Regarding claim 32, Oesterhaus discloses that when the actuation mechanism is installed and in the base position the actuation mechanism rests on a guide or a stop of the connection device (22). Regarding claim 34, Oesterhaus discloses a connection device comprising at least one direct-plug-in clamping connection having a direct-plug-in design for plugging in an electrical conductor, the at least one direct-plug-in clamping connection having at least one of a clamping spring (8), a busbar and a clamping cage, wherein the clamping spring is designed to clamp an electrical conductor plugged into the direct-plug-in clamping connection to form an electrically conductive contact with the busbar (9) or the clamping cage, the at least one direct-plug-in clamping connection further having an actuation mechanism (15, 19) movable between a base position (Fig. 2) and an actuation position (Fig. 3) for moving the clamping spring to release the electrical conductor, the actuation mechanism having at least two actuation regions (16, 17) for an actuation tool, the at least two actuation regions arranged at an angle (a) > 0 relative to each other, wherein the actuation mechanism (19) traverses an actuation space when moved between the base position and the actuation position. Regarding claim 35, Oesterhaus discloses the actuation mechanism traversing an actuation space including the actuation mechanism (19) extending into and along a length of the actuation space (vertically on Figs. 2 and 3) when the actuation mechanism is moved between the base position and actuation position. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 33 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oesterhaus in view of Wago et al. (DE 20 2024 106 714). Regarding claim 33, Wago teaches and actuation mechanism (4), wherein a path of movement of the axis from the first position (Fig. 6) to the second position (Fig. 14) is defined by movement of the actuation mechanism between the base position and the actuation position. Wago teaches that a floating axis and a fixed axis can be alternatively used. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use an axis with a movable path, as taught by Wago, in order to better control the translation and pressure provided by the actuation mechanism. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the grounds of rejection, as applied. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FELIX O FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-2003. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at (571)727-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FELIX O FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 23, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12658626
HIGH SPEED AND HIGH DENSITY CABLE INTERCONNECTS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651879
WATT-HOUR METER BLADE
5y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12649428
ELECTRIC JUNCTION BOX FOR VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12640521
INSERT FOR A CONNECTOR
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633473
LONG-STROKE TRIGGER SWITCH WITH INSTANTANEOUS STRUCTURE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month