Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/558,287

TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 31, 2023
Examiner
LAM, YEE F
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NTT Docomo Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
486 granted / 632 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
677
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 632 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priorities and Examiner Remarks This application is a National Stage entry of PCT/JP2022/015544 (international filing date: 03/29/2022) which claims foreign priority to application of JAPAN: 2021-089352 (filed 05/27/2021). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) (1) as being anticipated by CHIN et al. (US 20210028849 A1, hereinafter CHIN). Regarding claim 7, CHIN teaches a terminal comprising (in general, see fig. 3 and many of its corresponding paragraphs): a receiver that receives information configuring a plurality of physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resources for a scheduling request (SR) for transmission/reception point (TRP)-specific beam failure detection (BFD) (CHIN, see at least para. 41 along with para. 50, “...the UE may transmit a BFR-SR on a dedicated PUCCH resource for BFR-SR transmission. In one implementation, a “triggered SR procedure” may also be referred to as a “triggered SR for SCell BFR”. In one implementation, a PUCCH resource for BFR-SR transmission may be configured by the network via dedicated signaling...”, note that “...BFR-SR configuration may be configured per BWP, per TRP, per CC, per set of CCs, per CG, and/or per UE...”); and a processor that, when the SR for TRP-specific BFD is triggered for an other purpose, controls to select and apply one PUCCH resource of the plurality of PUCCH resources for the other purpose (CHIN, see at least para. 260, for one non-limiting example, “...In some implementations, The UE transmits the BFR-SR on a PUCCH resource for BFR-SR transmission, and the PUCCH resource is configured on a BWP. If the UE switches/deactivated the BWP to another BWP, the UE may transmit the BFR-SR on another PUCCH resource for BFR-SR transmission, which is configured on another BWP...”, note that “...BFR-SR configuration may be configured per BWP, per TRP, per CC, per set of CCs, per CG, and/or per UE...”). Regarding claim 8, this claim is rejected for the same reasoning as claim 7 except this claim is in method claim format. Regarding claim 9, this claim is rejected for the same reasoning as claim 7. To be more specific, although reciting subject matters slightly different, one skilled in the art would have known claim 9 performs reverse (or corresponding) procedures of claim 7. For example, it would be a base station of claim 9 that performs the reverse (or corresponding) receiving from and transmitting to the terminal of claim 7. Hence, the examiner applies the same rejection reasoning as set forth in claim 7. Regarding claim 10, this claim is rejected for the same reasoning as combination of claims 7 and 9, except this claim is in system claim format. To be more specific, CHIN also teaches a same or similar system comprising terminal and base station (CHIN, see at least of fig. 3), which are well known in the art and commonly used for providing and enabling robust and reliable data communication hardware and software. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/05/2026 have been fully considered. Regarding independent claims 7, 8, 9, and 10, since applicant's amendment necessitated new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action, previous Office action's rejections are moot. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YEE F LAM whose telephone number is (571)270-7577. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayman Abaza can be reached on 571-270-0422. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YEE F LAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Feb 05, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604300
Prioritization Between Uplink and Sidelink Communications
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587822
DISCOVERY OF SIDELINK DEVICES USING A DISCOVERY SEQUENCE AND A DISCOVERY REPLY SEQUENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574917
SCHEDULING REQUEST CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574849
TECHNIQUES FOR BITRATE CONTROL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568414
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DUAL ACTIVE PROTOCOL STACK (DAPS) HANDOVER IN NEXT GENERATION MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.8%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 632 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month