Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/558,348

SPLIT-PHASE OUTPUT POWER ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM, ADJUSTMENT METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM IN LOW VOLTAGE TRANSFORMER AREA

Non-Final OA §101§103
Filed
Oct 31, 2023
Examiner
SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Electric Power Research Institute Of Yunnan Power Grid Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
135 granted / 222 resolved
+5.8% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
256
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§103
58.1%
+18.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 222 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) calculating power to be compensated for each phase in a transformer area; S130, determining an adjustment power supply that needs to participate in unbalanced adjustment in the transformer area, wherein adjustment power supplies comprise distributed photovoltaic devices and distributed small energy storage power supplies in the transformer area; S140, calculating unbalanced adjustment power to be output by each split-phase power adjustment module, and determining three-phase compensation reference currents and repeating the steps S120 to S160. The determining and calculating pertain to a mental process since these steps can be performed in the mind using pen and paper and thus falls under the mental process grouping of abstract ideas (MPEP 2106.04(a)(2)(III)). The claim does not integrate the judicial exceptions into a practical application. The claim includes additional limitations including: detecting a three-phase unbalance degree, obtaining actual compensation currents of converters of phase output modules by tracking the current reference values, detecting whether a change range of the three-phase unbalance degree reaches a set offset value. These limitations are recited at a high level of generality and amount to mere data gathering which is a form of insignificant extra solution activity (MPEP 2106.05(g)). The claim does not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. As noted above, the data gathering steps relate to insignificant extra solution activity (MPEP 2106.05(g)). Additionally, the gathering step amounts to receiving or transmitting data over a network and is well understood routine and conventional in the field (MPEP 2106.05(d)(II)). Thus, this is well-understood, routine and conventional (MPEP 2106.05(d)(II)). The claim does not include any further additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. Therefore, claim 9 is rejected. Claim 10 recites when the computer program is executed by a processor, the split-phase output power adjustment method in the low voltage transformer of claim 9 is performed. This limitation are at a high level of generality and amount to field of use and technological environment (2106.05(h)). Therefore, claim 10 is rejected. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because computer-readable storage medium is not limited to a non-transitory storage medium. The instant specification discloses that computer-readable storage medium can be a “Computer instructions can be stored in computer-readable storage media or transferred from one computer-readable storage medium to another. For example, computer instructions can be transmitted from a website site, computer, server, or data center to another website site, computer, server or data center for transmission, by a wired way (e.g., coaxial cable, optical fiber, digital subscriber line (DSL)) or a wireless way (e.g., infrared, wireless, microwave, etc.). The computer-readable storage medium may be any available medium that can be stored by a computer, or a data storage device such as a server, a data center, etc. integrated with one or more available media” (0109). A transitory computer readable storage medium corresponds to a transitory storage medium which is understood to not be a process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter and thus is not patent eligible. Therefore, claim 10 is rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ying et al (CN112909968, herein Ying) in view of Gao et al (US PUB. 20220271712, herein Gao). Regarding claim 1, Ying teaches A split-phase output power adjustment system in a low voltage transformer area, comprising adjustment power supplies, split-phase power adjustment modules, [sub-controllers, and a main controller] (abstract “switching a three-phase unbalance treatment line in a low-voltage transformer area, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the method comprises the steps of determining three-phase unbalanced load power adjustment quantity based on acquired power grid data, setting a three-phase unbalanced load change-over optimization model, and performing adjustment optimization on a manual off-line change over three-phase unbalanced line”, page 4 “The embodiment of the invention also provides a computer readable storage medium, and the computer readable storage medium stores computer instructions so as to execute the low-voltage transformer area three-phase unbalance treatment line switching method provided by the embodiment of the invention”); the adjustment power supplies connected to the split-phase power adjustment modules, and total power P of the adjustment power supplies complying with a relationship as follows: P= Pt=PG1 +PG2 +…PGn wherein Pt is power required to comply with three-phase current unbalance adjustment of a distribution transformer, PG1 , PG2, …PGn is power generated by each of the adjustment power supplies to compensate three-phase current unbalance in a transformer area (page 7-8 “low-voltage transformer area three-phase imbalance management line switching method according to the embodiment of the present invention, the three-phase imbalance load power adjustment amount is determined through the power grid data, the three-phase imbalance load switching optimization model is set to perform adjustment optimization on the manual off-line switching three-phase imbalance line, so as to meet the requirements of the current three-phase imbalance load adjustment timeliness, accuracy and user high-quality service, and the transformer area user switching amount and phase selection are guided through the adjustment optimization model, so that the dynamic balance of the transformer area three-phase load is ensured”); wherein the split-phase power adjustment modules are connected to lines of three phases A, B, and C [and a neutral line N] in the transformer area (page 8 “representing the mean value of three-phase currents, i Phase current of A phase, i Phase current of B phase, i The phase current of the C A B C phase is shown”); wherein the sub-controllers are connected to the adjustment power supplies, [and the sub-controllers communicate with the main controller to control power] generated by each of the adjustment power supplies, so as to compensate the unbalanced three-phase current in the transformer area (page 8 “three-phase imbalance load switching optimization model is set to perform adjustment optimization on the manual off-line switching three-phase imbalance line, so as to meet the requirements of the current three-phase imbalance load adjustment timeliness, accuracy and user high-quality service, and the transformer area user switching amount and phase selection are guided through the adjustment optimization model, so that the dynamic balance of the transformer area three-phase load is ensured.”). The cited prior art do not teach sub-controllers, and a main controller, and a neutral line N, and the sub-controllers communicate with the main controller to control power. Gao teaches sub-controllers, and a main controller (0081 “the fault detection apparatus 500 may further include a breaking unit 504 connected to the controller 503. The breaking unit 504 may be connected between the output end of the grid-tied inverter and the plurality of filter capacitors and may be disconnected or connected under control of the controller”) and a neutral line N (0069) and the sub-controllers communicate with the main controller to control power (0081 “the fault detection apparatus 500 may further include a breaking unit 504 connected to the controller 503. The breaking unit 504 may be connected between the output end of the grid-tied inverter and the plurality of filter capacitors and may be disconnected or connected under control of the controller”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to have modified the teachings of Ying with the fault detection and appropriate control teachings of Gao since Ying teaches a means for dynamic balance of the transformer area three-phase load to be ensured (page 8). Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ying et al (CN112909968, herein Ying) in view of Gao et al (US PUB. 20220271712, herein Gao) in further view of Ayai (US PUB. 20160336873). Regarding claim 2, the cited prior art teach The system of claim 1. The cited prior art do not teach wherein, the split-phase power adjustment modules comprise a first filter capacitor, a second filter capacitor, a three-phase reactor, and a three-phase full-bridge inverter; wherein the first filter capacitor and the second filter capacitor are connected to a power grid between the neutral line of the power grid and the three-phase full-bridge inverter, and the three-phase reactor is connected between the three-phase full-bridge inverter and a three-phase line of the power grid; wherein inductance values of the first filter capacitor, the second filter capacitor and the three-phase reactor are determined by capacity and filter effect thereof. Ayai teaches wherein, the split-phase power adjustment modules comprise a first filter capacitor, a second filter capacitor, a three-phase reactor, and a three-phase full-bridge inverter (0086 “AC reactor 23 is provided on the output side of the full-bridge inverter 21 in the second converter 2, and a voltage sensor 9 for detecting output voltage of the first converter 1 is provided. The other hardware configuration is the same. The AC reactor 23 and the capacitor 22 compose a filter circuit (low-pass filter) for removing a high-frequency component contained in output of the second converter 2. Information about the voltage detected by the voltage sensor 9 is sent to the control unit”, fig. 9); wherein the first filter capacitor and the second filter capacitor are connected to a power grid between the neutral line of the power grid and the three-phase full-bridge inverter, and the three-phase reactor is connected between the three-phase full-bridge inverter and a three-phase line of the power grid (0108 “the power conversion device 100P may be connected to a single-phase load or a power grid”, 0086 “AC reactor 23 is provided on the output side of the full-bridge inverter 21 in the second converter 2, and a voltage sensor 9 for detecting output voltage of the first converter 1 is provided. The other hardware configuration is the same. The AC reactor 23 and the capacitor 22 compose a filter circuit (low-pass filter) for removing a high-frequency component contained in output of the second converter 2. Information about the voltage detected by the voltage sensor 9 is sent to the control unit”, fig. 9 ; wherein inductance values of the first filter capacitor, the second filter capacitor and the three-phase reactor are determined by capacity and filter effect thereof (0007 “voltage of the DC bus 204 is 600V, when a switching element in the three-phase inverter circuit 207 is turned off, due to resonance by a floating inductance and the capacitance of the switching element, voltage that greatly exceeds 600V is applied to the switching element”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to have modified the teachings of Gao and Ying with the teachings of Ayai since Ayai teaches a means for reliably prevent insulation breakdown (0007). Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ying et al (CN112909968, herein Ying) in view of Gao et al (US PUB. 20220271712, herein Gao) in further view of Ma (US PUB. 20220393642, herein Ma). Regarding claim 3, the cited prior art teach The system of claim 1. The cited prior art do not teach wherein the sub-controllers communicate with the main controller via wireless or carrier wave, and the sub-controllers are electrically connected to the split-phase power adjustment modules, and are used for collecting power and voltage of each phase of the corresponding split-phase power adjustment modules connected to a grid-point, so as to upload them to the main controller, wherein the sub-controllers send control amount calculated by the main controller to the corresponding split-phase power adjustment modules, so as to control the split-phase power adjustment modules to output adjustment power corresponding to the main controller. Ma teaches wherein the sub-controllers communicate with the main controller via wireless or carrier wave, and the sub-controllers are electrically connected to the split-phase power adjustment modules, and are used for collecting power and voltage of each phase of the corresponding split-phase power adjustment modules connected to a grid-point, so as to upload them to the main controller, wherein the sub-controllers send control amount calculated by the main controller to the corresponding split-phase power adjustment modules, so as to control the split-phase power adjustment modules to output adjustment power corresponding to the main controller (0022 “power carrier signal transmitted between controllers in different photovoltaic units in a photovoltaic system, where the power carrier signal carries identification information of a controller that sends the power carrier signal, and the attenuation reference factor is used to reflect an attenuation degree of signal attenuation of the power carrier signal in a process of being transmitted, to a controller in a photovoltaic unit, from the controller that is in another photovoltaic unit and that is indicated by the identification information in the power carrier signal; a determining module, configured to determine, based on the attenuation reference factor, an attenuation degree of a power carrier signal obtained by a controller in each photovoltaic unit”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to have modified the teachings of Gao and Ying with the teachings of Ma since Ma teaches a means for “improving operation and maintenance efficiency of the photovoltaic system” (0009). Claim(s) 9 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Black et al (US PUB. 20120074779, herein Black) in view of Varma et al (US PUB. 20160197482, herein Varma) in further view of Zhou et al (US PAT. 7508173, herein Zhou). Regarding claim 9, Black teaches A split-phase output power adjustment method in a low voltage transformer area, comprising: S110, detecting a three-phase unbalance degree (0021 “total phase A load on transmission substation 52 includes all the phase A loads on local substations 56, 156, 256. Similarly, total phase B and phase C loads on transmission substation 52 are the sum of respective phase loads on local substations 56, 156, 256. Thus, transmission substation 52 has 170 MVA load on phase A, 152 MVA load on phase B and 174 MVA load on phase C which is unbalanced load distribution on transmission substation” 0001 “In a balanced three-phase power system, the individual phase quantities (voltages/currents) are equal in magnitude and are displaced with respect to each other by 120.degree”, 0022, fig. 5); S120, [at a condition that the three-phase unbalance degree does not reach a starting value], calculating power to be compensated for each phase in a transformer area (0006 “The method also includes estimating an available demand response on the distribution system for the period of interest and allocating an optimized demand response from available demand response to minimize the voltage unbalance on the distribution system”). The cited prior art do not teach at a condition that the three-phase unbalance degree does not reach a starting value, S130, determining an adjustment power supply that needs to participate in unbalanced adjustment in the transformer area, wherein adjustment power supplies comprise distributed photovoltaic devices and distributed small energy storage power supplies in the transformer area; S140, calculating unbalanced adjustment power to be output by each split-phase power adjustment module, and determining three-phase compensation reference currents Ia_ref, Ib_ref, Ic_ref of the split-phase power adjustment modules; S150, obtaining actual compensation currents Ioa , Iob, Ioc of converters of phase output modules by tracking the current reference values Ia_ref, Ib_ref, Ic_ref through hysteresis control of converters of the split-phase power adjustment modules; S160, detecting whether a change range of the three-phase unbalance degree reaches a set offset value; S170, if the set offset value has not been reached, repeating the steps S120 to S160. Varna teaches at a condition that the three-phase unbalance degree does not reach a starting value (0166 “the voltage regulation mode is activated only if the PCC voltage rises/drops below the set reference value of ±1% (1.01 pu or 0.99 pu). The current harmonic compensation loop is activated if the THD in load current is noticed to be more than 5%”) S140, calculating unbalanced adjustment power to be output by each split-phase power adjustment module, and determining three-phase compensation reference currents Ia_ref, Ib_ref, Ic_ref of the split-phase power adjustment modules (0166 “the voltage regulation mode is activated only if the PCC voltage rises/drops below the set reference value of ±1% (1.01 pu or 0.99 pu). The current harmonic compensation loop is activated if the THD in load current is noticed to be more than 5%”, table 1 instantaneous phase a, b, c reference current for PCC voltage) S150, obtaining actual compensation currents Ioa , Iob, Ioc of converters of phase output modules by tracking the current reference values Ia_ref, Ib_ref, Ic_ref through hysteresis control of converters of the split-phase power adjustment modules (0164 “all the control loop current components are added together to generate the overall reference current signals (i*.sub.SF,abc) for the solar farm inverter. These reference signals are then compared with actual sensed solar farm inverter output currents (i.sub.SF,abc) and processed using a hysteresis current controller to perform switching of inverter semiconductor devices”, 0165) S160, detecting whether a change range of the three-phase unbalance degree reaches a set offset value (0166 “the voltage regulation mode is activated only if the PCC voltage rises/drops below the set reference value of ±1% (1.01 pu or 0.99 pu). The current harmonic compensation loop is activated if the THD in load current is noticed to be more than 5%”) S170, if the set offset value has not been reached, repeating the steps S120 to S160 (0166 “All the reference signals for different functionalities are generated on a continuous basis and the master control unit is used to activate/deactivate different loops based on priorities and control requirements”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to have modified the teachings of Black with the teachings of Varma since Varma teaches a means for “enhance damping and stability, and provide other benefits provided by FACTS devices” (abstract). The cited prior art do not teach S130, determining an adjustment power supply that needs to participate in unbalanced adjustment in the transformer area, wherein adjustment power supplies comprise distributed photovoltaic devices and distributed small energy storage power supplies in the transformer area. Zhou teaches S130, determining an adjustment power supply that needs to participate in unbalanced adjustment in the transformer area, wherein adjustment power supplies comprise distributed photovoltaic devices and distributed small energy storage power supplies in the transformer area (1:55-65 “a reactive power compensation system comprises a distributed energy resource situated at a local location configured to also receive power from a remote location by a distribution feeder line. The distributed energy resource comprises an inverter comprising power semiconductor switching devices and an inverter controller configured for controlling the power semiconductor switching devices so as to provide reactive power support to the distribution feeder line”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to have modified the teachings of Black and Varma with Zhou since Zhou teaches a means for using photovoltaic systems in order to leverage these assets for desirable reactive power support (1:50-55). Regarding claim 10, A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program (Black 0007) wherein, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the split-phase output power adjustment method in the low voltage transformer of claim 9 is performed (taught as shown in the rejection of claim 9). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAMEEM SIDDIQUEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1627. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Lo can be reached at (571) 272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAMEEM D SIDDIQUEE/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602019
COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF REFERENCE RESPONSE PROFILE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595922
METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR EVACUATION OF CONTAMINATED AIR AND PREVENTION OF IGNITION IN AN AIR HANDLING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596857
METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE FOR OPTIMIZING PROCESS PARAMETER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590725
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING AMBIENT TEMPERATURE USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585249
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING VEHICLE MANIFEST DATA AT A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.4%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 222 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month