Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/558,418

PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGE WITH ALIGNMENT FEATURES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 01, 2023
Priority
May 03, 2021 — provisional 63/183,287 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, HOANG Q
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
388 granted / 574 resolved
At TC average
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
608
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
86.0%
+46.0% vs TC avg
§102
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 574 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 5/06/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 and 10-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent Application Publication to Vallance 2017/0299824US in view of the US Patent Application Publication to Butler 2016/0231513US and further in view of the US Patent Application Publication to Zhang 2018/0267265US. In terms of Claim 1, Vallance teaches an opto-electronic assembly (Figure 1-7) comprising: a substrate (Figure 2a-b: 100) comprising a plurality of first optical waveguides (Figure 5a: waveguides 102 or 112 on PIC substrate 100; [0052]); a cradle (Figure 3a: 21 or Figure 7a: 420) bonded to the substrate (Figure 4a: see 20 is bonded to 100 wherein 21 is part of vertical sidewall of 20 as shown Figure 3a-b) and defining a pocket (Figure 2b: open area of 29; Figure 7a: open area in 420) therein having an opening (Figure 2b: opening at 29), the pocket configured to receive an optical ferrule (Figure 3a: 22 contain grooves or channels 23 with circular or semi-circular cross-section as shown in Figure 4b: 23; thus, the examiner considers them to be ferrules) through the opening (Figure 3a: 23 located within the opening of 29) and align the optical ferrule (23) to the plurality of first optical waveguides (Figure 4b illustrates the fiber section 31 are aligned with 106 which contains 102 or 112 for optical transmission; [0052]); and a first cover (Figure 2a: 28 or Figure 7a wherein OSA 20 can have the top surface of shell 320 at 321 shown in Figure 7d; Element 321 function as a cover) encapsulating at least portions of the plurality of first optical waveguides (Figure 2a: 28 covers the waveguide both on the circuit board and the fibers sections 31; while 321 function in a similar manner) and the cradle (Figure 2a: 21 or Figure 7a: 420), the first cover comprising an aperture (Figure 7a: 320 contains an open window area at 322) exposing the opening of the pocket (Figure 7a: at 321), such that when the optical ferrule (23) is received in the pocket through the opening (Figure 2a: opening of 21 that houses 22) and secured therein and a plurality of second optical waveguides (fibers 31 are considers as waveguide since they can guide light) are attached to the optical ferrule (Figure 2a-b: 31 is attach to 23), the opto-electronic assembly (20) is configured to transfer light between the plurality of first optical waveguides (102/112) and the plurality of second optical waveguides (Figure 2a: 31; Paragraph [0052] discloses light couples from 102/112 to 31); wherein the optical ferrule (23) comprises a reflective light-turning surface (24/25/26) configured to redirect light between the plurality of second optical waveguides and the plurality of first optical waveguides through the aperture (102/112 or 10/31 wherein light is being directed as from one set of waveguides to another set on the sides of the ferrule 23 as shown by Figure 4b and 5a). Vallance does not teach a first cover that is an overmold formed on the substrate and the cradle and encapsulating at least portions of the plurality of first optical waveguides and the cradle; and the first cover comprising an aperture exposing aligned with and exposing the opening of the pocket, whereby the optical ferrules is insertable and removable through the aperture while the first cover is in place; and wherein the cradle comprises integral refractive optical lenses disposed in an optical path between the plurality of first optical waveguides and the plurality of second optical waveguides. Butler does teach a first cover (Figure 16: 162) that is an overmold formed on the substrate (Figure 17a: 162 is formed over the substrate 166) and the cradle (Figure 16: 164) and encapsulating at least portions of the plurality of first optical waveguides and the cradle (Figure 17a: 162 encapsulate the cradle 164 and the bottom substrate 166)” and the first cover (162) comprising an aperture (Figure 16: see “aperture”) aligned with and exposing the opening of the pocket (open area that house fibers under 162), whereby the optical ferrules (Figure 15: is an multi-channel ferrule housing several fibers tips wherein each channel functions as ferrule) is insertable and removable through the aperture while the first cover is in place (Figure 15: 190 can move or slide along recess area of 188a in and out of the aperture opening); PNG media_image1.png 436 534 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 540 732 media_image2.png Greyscale and wherein the cradle comprises integral refractive optical lenses (Figure 16: 169) disposed in an optical path between the plurality of first optical waveguides and the plurality of second optical waveguides (Figure 15: the lens is in-between 156 and waveguides 146 along the optical path). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device cradle Vallance to be similar to cradle design of Butler which includes an aperture opening to include a MT type ferrule. This allows the fibers to be mated with a ferrule connector instead of just bear fibers which overs no protection to internal fibers. Further it allows the fiber cable to easily installed by a sliding movement which reduce the chance of the fiber stub being damage. The modification of the lens allows light to be directed downward wherein lens can perform additional function such as collimating or focusing which further reduces insertion or coupling loss to the 2nd waveguide. Vallance / Butler do not teach the first cover being a monolithic overmold formed after the cradle is bonded to the substrate and encapsulating the cradle on all sides. Zhang does teach a first cover (Figure 4: 304) that is an overmold formed on the substrate (Figure 4: 304 and 311) and the cradle (Figure 4: 303 and components within substrate 311) and encapsulating at least portions of the plurality of first optical waveguides and the cradle (Figures 10a and 10b: wherein waveguides are within connector or MT ferrule which is encapsulated within 304 as shown in Figures 5 and 6); and the first cover (304) comprising an aperture exposing aligned with and exposing the opening of the pocket (Figure 5: see connector registration structure or 502), whereby the optical ferrules (Figure 5: within 502) is insertable and removable through the aperture while the first cover is in place; the first cover (304) being a monolithic overmold formed after the cradle is bonded to the substrate ([0027]) and encapsulating the cradle on all sides (Figure 4: 304 encapsulate the cradle area within the registration structure). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cover of Vallance / Butler to be encapsulating to cradle waveguides in order to protect the device from dust, provides mechanical alignment and protection to the internal components within the cover recess area (Zhang’s [0056]). As for Claim 2, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 1, wherein Vallance further teaches the opening comprises an open top of the pocket (Figure 2a: 21 contains a middle area that’s open on the top). As for Claim 3, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 1, wherein Vallance further teaches the opening comprises an open side of the pocket (Figure 2b: 21 contains an open top and sides at 24). As for Claim 4, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 1, wherein Vallance further teaches the pocket of the cradle (21) comprises at least one mechanical alignment feature (24 located on the left and right sides or internal vertical side walls of open area 29) configured to align the optical ferrule (23) to at least one of the plurality of first optical waveguides (Figure 4b: 31 is aligned with section 106 which contains waveguide 112 as shown by Figure 5a: wherein 31 is located on top of 102 and 106). As for Claim 5 , Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 1, wherein Vallance further teaches the first cover (either 28 or 320 top surface) provides a seal for the at least portions of the plurality of first optical waveguides (Figure 7a: 320 contains waveguide section within 320; Figure 2a: 28 seals the fiber section 31 and covers up the waveguide on 101) and the cradle (Figure 2a: 28 covers up the cradle 21, Figure 7a: 320 top surface covers up the middle area of 420), except for the opening therein (Figure 2a: 28 leaves expose part of the opening in the middle of 22 while Figure 7a: contain a window area 322 which is expose to the middle portion opening), As for Claim 6, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 1, Vallance further teaches an outer cap (Figure 6a:334 functions as an outer cap to 520), the outer cap (334) covering the opening (Figure 6a: 334 partially covers portion of the middle window area of 520 on the top surface) and securing the optical ferrule in the pocket (Figure 6a: 334 functions as clip that secures 520 to shell 333). As for Claim 7, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 6, wherein Vallance further teaches the outer cap (334) provides strain relief to at least some of the plurality of second optical waveguides (Figure 7a: second waveguides are located in fiber section 31 which is within 520). The clip 334 provides strain relief if pressure was applied to clip via its top surface. The clip slanted structure will absorb some pressure if the pressure was exerted to fiber in a vertical downward manner during installation or removal from the cradle Figure 6a: 334 and 420). As for Claim 10, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 1, Vallance further teaches further comprising an adhesive (Paragraph [0055] teaches epoxy is used to secure 100 to 20), the adhesive at least partially filling a space between the first cover and the substrate adhesive (Figure 4b shows 28 is between the middle portion of 20 and the substrate 100; Paragraph [0055] teaches epoxy is used to secure 100 to 20. Thus, adhesive must be located between 100 and 28 in order to secure 100 to 20 as shown in Figure 4b and disclosed by [0055]). As for Claim 11, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 1, wherein Vallance further teaches the cradle (21) comprises integral optical lenses disposed between the plurality of first optical waveguides and the plurality of second optical waveguides ([0052] and [0057] As for Claim 12, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 1, wherein Vallance further teaches the light transferred between the plurality of first optical waveguides (102/112) and the plurality of second optical waveguides (31) is substantially collimated ([0055]) for at least a portion of the optical path between the plurality of first optical waveguides and the plurality of second optical waveguides (Paragraph [0052] teaches light being coupled from 31 to 102/112 via section 106 and Paragraph [0055] teaches element 25 allows the light to be collimated along the way). As for claim 13, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 12, Vallance further teaches comprising a structure capable of reshaping light ([0053-0055]) between the first optical waveguide (102/112) and the second optical waveguides (31). Vallance does not mention the act of reshaping the light is expanding the beam connection between the first and second waveguides. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Vallance to reshape light to a level that causes the beam to expand in order to increase coupling efficiency. It has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art, In re Antonie, 195 USPQ 6 (C.C.P.A. 1977). In terms of Claim 14, Vallance teaches an opto-electronic assembly (Figure 2-7) comprising: a substrate (Figure 2b: 100 or Figure 7a: 101) comprising an electrically conductive trace (Figure 2a: 100 or Figure 7a: 101 may contain 130 which contains anode and cathode electrode as shown Figure 5b; electrodes are conductive traces); a cradle (Figure 2a: 21) bonded to the substrate (Figure 2a: 21 to 100 via epoxy [0055]) and defining a pocket therein (Figure 2a: middle portion of 21); and an overmold (Figure 2a: 28 or Figure 7a: top wall of shell 320) covering at least portions of the substrate (Figure 4b: 28 and 100 or Figure 7a: 320 cover 101) and the cradle (Figure 2a: 21 or Figure 7a 420), the overmold (28 or top surface of 320) defining an opening (Figure 7a: 322 is opening window in 320) therein at least partially exposing the pocket for receiving an optical ferrule (the middle contents within 320) therein so that light may be transferred between an optical element (fibers within 320 and the waveguides on 101) disposed on the substrate (100 or 101) and an optical waveguide (Figure 2a: 31) attached to the optical ferrule (Figure 3a: 23), wherein the optical element is at least partially encapsulated by the overmold (Figure 7a: 320 top surface covers the optical element 101; Figure 2a: 28 covers the optical element 102/112 on 100). Vallance does not teach an overmold formed on and covering at least portions of the substrate, the overmold defining an opening therein at least partially exposing the pocket for receiving an optical ferrule therein while the overmold is in place; and wherein the optical element is at least partially encapsulated by the overmold, and wherein the cradle comprises integral refractive optical lenses disposed between the optical element and the optical waveguide attached to the optical ferrule. Butler does teach an overmold formed on and covering at least portions of the substrate (Figure 17a: 162 is formed over the substrate 166) and the cradle (Figure 16: 164), the overmold (162) defining an opening therein at least partially exposing the pocket for receiving an optical ferrule therein while the overmold is in place (Figure 17: 162 over 164); and wherein the optical element (Figure 17:162 is covering optical element 146 on the bottom) is at least partially encapsulated by the overmold (Figure 17: 162/164 covers 146), and wherein the cradle (164) comprises integral refractive optical lenses (169) disposed between the optical element and the optical waveguide attached to the optical ferrule (Figure 15: 190/ 164/ 169/ 146). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device cradle Vallance to be similar to cradle design of Butler which includes an aperture opening to include a MT type ferrule. This allows the fibers to be mated with a ferrule connector instead of just bear fibers which overs no protection to internal fibers. Further it allows the fiber cable to easily installed by a sliding movement which reduce the chance of the fiber stub being damage. The modification of the lens allows light to be directed downward wherein lens can perform additional function such as collimating or focusing which further reduces insertion or coupling loss to the optical element. Vallance / Butler do not teach the first cover being a monolithic overmold formed after the cradle is bonded to the substrate and encapsulating the cradle on all sides. Zhang does teach a first cover (Figure 4: 304) that is an overmold formed on the substrate (Figure 4: 304 and 311) and the cradle (Figure 4: 303 and components within substrate 311) and encapsulating at least portions of the plurality of first optical waveguides and the cradle (Figures 10a and 10b: wherein waveguides are within connector or MT ferrule which is encapsulated within 304 as shown in Figures 5 and 6); and the first cover (304) comprising an aperture exposing aligned with and exposing the opening of the pocket (Figure 5: see connector registration structure or 502), whereby the optical ferrules (Figure 5: within 502) is insertable and removable through the aperture while the first cover is in place; the first cover (304) being a monolithic overmold formed after the cradle is bonded to the substrate ([0027]) and encapsulating the cradle on all sides (Figure 4: 304 encapsulate the cradle area within the registration structure). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cover of Vallance / Butler to be encapsulating to cradle waveguides in order to protect the device from dust, provides mechanical alignment and protection to the internal components within the cover recess area (Zhang’s [0056]). As for Claim 15, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 14, wherein Vallance further teaches the opening comprises an open top of the pocket (Figure 2a: 21 contains a middle area that’s open on the top). As for Claim 16, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 14, wherein Vallance further teaches the opening comprises an open side of the pocket (Figure 2b: 21 contains an open top and sides at 24). As for Claim 17, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 14, wherein Vallance further teaches the pocket of the cradle (21) comprises at least one mechanical alignment feature (24 located on the left and right sides or internal vertical side walls of open area 29) configured to align the optical ferrule (23) to at least one of the plurality of first optical waveguides (Figure 4b: 31 is aligned with section 106 which contains waveguide 112 as shown by Figure 5a: wherein 31 is located on top of 102 and 106). As for Claim 18, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 14, wherein Vallance further teaches the overmold (Figure 2a: 28) encapsulates at least portions of the electrically conductive trace and (Figure 4b: 130 wherein cathode and anode are connector traces which are located at 104 and 105 [0064] and 28 covers 104/105). As for Claim 19, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 14, wherein Vallance further teaches the optical ferrule (Figure 3a: 23) is removably received in the pocket (middle area of 21) when the overmold is in place Figure 2a: 28 and Figure 2b: 23). As for Claim 20, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 14, wherein Vallance teaches the overmold (28) provides a seal for the at least portions of the substrate and the cradle (100 and 21), except for the opening therein (Figure 2a: 28 doesn’t cover a portion of 21 that contains the opening mainly in the area 26/25/34). Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vallance 2017/0299824US / Butler 2016/0231513US / Zhang 2018/0267265US as applied to claim 6 above, and further in view of US Patent Application Publication to Barwicz 2017/0196097US. In regards to Claim 8, Vallance / Butler / Zhang teaches the device of Claim 6, Vallance does not teach a device further comprising a curable adhesive ([0048]) securing the outer cap (Figure 8: outer cap 414) to the first cover overmold (Figure 8: 414 is secured to overmold layer 126) and forming an environmental seal around the aperture (Figure 8: 426 / 428 used to form a seal in openings or aperture taken up by 546). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Vallance / Butler to have an additional cap to protect the overmold layer wherein adhesive is used to provide the mechanical bonding while providing an environmental seal at the adhesion site. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 and 14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any of the combination of references applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Newly amended limitations to Claims 1 and 14 have been rejected in view of the prior art to Zhang as detailed above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent Application Publication to Nishimura 2011/0064358US teaches an optical connector coupled to a cradle over a substrate circuit board. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOANG Q TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5049. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 am - 5:30pm Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached at 5712722397. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOANG Q TRAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2874 /UYEN CHAU N LE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 18, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636843
Method for Manufacturing an Electro-Optical Component and Electro-Optical Component
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631837
PHOTONIC QUASI-MONOLITHIC DIE ARCHITECTURES
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625337
Fiber Optic Cassette
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619031
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO REDUCE EMI FOR FIBER OPTIC ARRAYS
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12607817
RECONFIGURABLE MODULAR FIBER OPTIC CASSETTE
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.5%)
3y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 574 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month