Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/558,529

OPTICAL MODULE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Nov 01, 2023
Examiner
BELLO, AGUSTIN
Art Unit
2635
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Innolight Technology (Tongling) Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
679 granted / 901 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
925
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§102
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 901 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 and 10-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by LIU (Publication No.: US 2022/0404563 A1). Regarding claim 1, LIU teaches An optical module, comprising a housing (reference numeral 201, 202 in Figure 4), and an optical assembly (reference numeral 800 in Figure 6) and a circuit board (reference numeral 602 in Figure 6) which are disposed inside the housing, wherein the optical module further comprises an optical device box (reference numeral 600 in Figure 5) disposed inside the housing, wherein the optical assembly is packaged in the optical device box (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 6); the circuit board is provided with an extension portion (e.g. the leftmost and/or rightmost extension portions of reference numeral 602 as illustrated in Figure 6 and/or reference numeral 6024, 6026 in Figure 8) extending to overlap the optical device box, the optical device box is fixed on one surface of the extension portion (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 5) ; wherein the extension portion (e.g. the leftmost and/or rightmost extension portions of reference numeral 602 as illustrated in Figure 6 and/or reference numeral 6024, 6026 in Figure 8) is part of the circuit board (reference numeral 602 in Figure 6), and is not a flexible circuit board (e.g. “metallized ceramic” as in paragraph [0049]), the optical device box is provided with an optical interface (reference numeral 700 in Figure 5) and an electrical interface (e.g. “Pins” as in paragraph [0049] at the edge of reference numeral 602 in Figure 6 and/or reference numeral 6027, 6025 in Figure 8) , the optical assembly comprises a photoelectric chip (reference numeral 805 in Figure 9) and an optical processing unit (reference numeral 802 in Figure 9) , the photoelectric chip is electrically connected to the circuit board outside the optical device box through the electrical interface (e.g. via reference numeral 602, 6027, 6025, 6024, 6026 as illustrated in Figure 8) , the optical processing unit is optically connected to the outside of the optical device box through the optical interface (reference numeral 700 in Figure 5) . Regarding claim 2, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 1, wherein the housing comprises an upper housing (reference numeral 201 in Figure 4) , a lower housing (reference numeral 202 in Figure 4) and a movable head (reference numeral 203 in Figure 4) that cooperate with each other, wherein the upper housing and the lower housing are matched to form an internal accommodation cavity (e.g. “enclosed chamber” as in paragraph [0039]) and an end portion space (reference numeral 205 in Figure 3) for accommodating the movable head; one end of the internal accommodation cavity is connected to the end portion space (e.g. via “openings” as in paragraph [0040]), and the other end has an opening (reference numeral 204 in Figure 3) ; the circuit board and the optical device box are located in the internal accommodation cavity (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 4) ; the extension portion (e.g. the leftmost and/or rightmost extension portions of reference numeral 602 as illustrated in Figure 6 and/or reference numeral 6024, 6026 in Figure 8) of the circuit board is adjacent to the end portion space (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 4) , and one end of the circuit board away from the extension portion passes through the opening to be electrically connected to outside of the optical module (e.g. “opening 204 is an electrical port from which the golden fingers of the circuit board protrude and are inserted into a host computer” as in paragraph [0040]). Regarding claim 3, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 1, wherein the extension portion (e.g. the leftmost and/or rightmost extension portions of reference numeral 602 as illustrated in Figure 6 and/or reference numeral 6024, 6026 in Figure 8) has a fixed surface face to the optical device box (e.g. “boss 6024 is provided on the sixth side plate 6022” as in paragraph [0054]) and an expanded surface away from the fixed surface (e.g. the plane on which reference numeral 6025 lies extending in a leftward direction to the end of reference numeral 6024 as illustrated in Figure 8) ; wherein the fixed surface is configured to support and fix the optical device box (e.g. by virtue of attachment between reference numerals 6024, 6022, 6021, 6023 as illustrated in Figure 8) ; a layout space of the circuit board comprises the expanded surface (reference numeral 6024 in Figure 8). Regarding claim 4, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 1, wherein the electrical interface (reference numeral 602 in Figure 8) comprises a radio frequency (RF) signal connection port (reference numeral 6025 in Figure 8) and a direct current (DC) signal connection port (reference numeral 6025 in Figure 8) , the RF signal connection port is electrically connected to the circuit board (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 8) , and configured to transmit a RF signal between the circuit board and the optical assembly inside the optical device box (e.g. “I2C signals, data information” as in paragraph [0004] and/or “RF” as in paragraph [0087]); the DC signal connection port is electrically connected to the circuit board (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 8), and configured to transmit a DC signal between the circuit board and the optical assembly inside the optical device box (e.g. “power supply” “grounding” as in paragraph [0004] and/or “DC” as in paragraph [0087]). Regarding claim 5, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 4, wherein the optical module comprises a conductive substrate (reference numeral 6024, 6025, 6026 in Figure 8) , the conductive substrate is provided on one side wall of the optical device box (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 8), wherein one end of the conductive substrate is electrically connected to the optical assembly in the optical device box (e.g. “light-emitting device 800 can be connected to the pads 6027 via gold wire bondings” as in paragraph [0054]) , and the other end extends through the side wall to the outside of the optical device box (reference numeral 6024 in Figure 8) ; a portion of the conductive substrate located outside the optical device box has two surfaces opposite each other (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 5) , and the RF signal connection port and the DC signal connection port are respectively disposed on the two surfaces (e.g. “RF flexible circuit board is connected to an upper side” “DC flexible circuit board is connected to a lower side” as in paragraph [0087]). Regarding claim 6, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 5, wherein the RF signal connection port is electrically connected to the circuit board through a RF signal flexible circuit board (e.g. upper flexible circuit board of reference numeral 500 in Figure 5) ; the DC signal connection port is electrically connected to the circuit board through a DC signal flexible circuit board (e.g. lower flexible circuit board of reference numeral 500 in Figure 5). Regarding claim 7, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 6, wherein the optical assembly (reference numeral 800 in Figure 6) comprises a transmission end optical assembly (e.g. rightmost portion of reference numeral 800 in Figure 6) and a receiving end optical assembly (e.g. leftmost portion of reference numeral 800 in Figure 6), the RF signal flexible circuit board (e.g. upper flexible circuit board of reference numeral 500 in Figure 5) comprises a first transmission portion (e.g. leftmost portion of reference numeral 500 as illustrated in Figure 5) and a second transmission portion (e.g. rightmost portion of reference numeral 500 as illustrated in Figure 5), the first transmission portion is provided for the circuit board to transmit the RF signal toward the transmission end optical assembly, and the second transmission portion is provided for the receiving end optical assembly to transmit the RF signal toward the circuit board. Regarding claim 10, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 1, wherein the optical device box comprises a bottom plate (reference numeral 603 in Figure 6 and/or reference numeral 801, 603 in Figure 9 ) , side walls arranged around the bottom plate (reference numeral 601 in Figure 6) , and a cover plate (reference numeral 604 in Figure 6) opposite to the bottom plate, wherein the side walls connect the bottom plate and the cover plate; the cover plate is adjacent to the extension portion of the circuit board, and the bottom plate is adjacent to an inner wall of the housing (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 4, 5, 6, and 14) . Regarding claim 11, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 10, wherein the optical device box is a hermetically sealed box (e.g. “hermetically” as in paragraph [0052] and throughout). Regarding claim 12, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 10, wherein the bottom plate is a heat-dissipation plate, the photoelectric chip is thermally connected to the heat-dissipation plate (e.g. “refrigerator” as in paragraph [0059]) , and the heat-dissipation plate is thermally connected to the housing (e.g. “heat generated by the optical module is conducted to the cage 106 and then dissipated by the heat sink 107 on the cage” as in paragraph [0037]) . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 8, 9, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LIU. Regarding claim 8, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 7, wherein the first transmission portion and the second transmission portion are arranged in parallel (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 5); the RF signal flexible circuit board further has a ground trace (e.g. “grounding” as in paragraph [0004]; “circuit traces so as to realize electrical functions such as power supply, electrical signal transmission, and grounding, etc” as in paragraph [0045]). LIU Differs from the claim invention in that it fails to specifically teach that ground trace is provided between the first transmission portion and the second transmission portion, wherein the ground trace is provided to isolate the first transmission portion from the second transmission portion. However, utilization of ground traces between transmission portions is well known in the art and Officially Noted as such. One skilled in the art would have been motivated to utilize a ground trace provided between the first transmission portion and the second transmission portion in order to isolate the first transmission portion from the second transmission portion and/or in order to meet design, budget, or performance requirements. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one skilled in the art to utilize a ground trace provided between the first transmission portion and the second transmission portion in LIU. Regarding claim 9, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 6, wherein the RF signal flexible circuit board (e.g. upper flexible circuit board of reference numeral 500 in Figure 5) and the DC signal flexible circuit board (e.g. lower flexible circuit board of reference numeral 500 in Figure 5) are respectively and electrically connected to the RF signal connection port and the DC signal connection port on the two surfaces of the conductive substrate (reference numeral 602 in Figure 6). LIU differs from the claim invention in that it fails to specifically teach that the claimed electrical connections come through an anisotropic conductive film or a solder anisotropic conductive paste. However, utilization of an anisotropic conductive film or a solder anisotropic conductive paste in making electrical connections is well known in the art and Officially Noted as such. One skilled in the art would have been motivated to utilize an anisotropic conductive film or a solder anisotropic conductive paste in order to meet design, budget, or performance requirements. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one skilled in the art to utilize an anisotropic conductive film or a solder anisotropic conductive paste in LIU. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LIU in view of LIN (Publication No.: US 2018/0287705 A1) Regarding claim 13, LIU teaches The optical module according to claim 10, wherein the photoelectric chip comprises a light-emitting chip (reference numeral 805 in Figure 9), the optical processing unit comprises a transmission end optical processing unit (reference numeral 802 in Figure 9); the optical assembly comprises a transmission end optical assembly (reference numeral 808-811 in Figure 9), wherein the transmission end optical assembly comprises the light-emitting chip and the transmission end optical processing unit (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 9). LIU differs from the claim invention in that it fails to specifically teach that it fails to specifically teach the receiving aspects of the claimed invention, i.e. a light-receiving chip, a receiving end optical processing unit, and a receiving end optical assembly, where the receiving end optical assembly comprises the light-receiving chip and the receiving end optical processing unit; and the optical device box is provided with a partition isolating the transmission end optical assembly from the receiving end optical assembly. However, LIN teaches that these concepts are well known in the art (Figure 3A). Furthermore, LIU discloses a bidirectional optical communication apparatus that suggests the optical receiving components (e.g. as in paragraph [0029]-[0034]). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one skilled in the art to include a light-receiving chip, a receiving end optical processing unit, and a receiving end optical assembly, where the receiving end optical assembly comprises the light-receiving chip and the receiving end optical processing unit; and the optical device box is provided with a partition isolating the transmission end optical assembly from the receiving end optical assembly in LIU. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, with respect to the rejection(s) of the claim(s) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of a new interpretation of LIU. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AGUSTIN BELLO whose telephone number is (571)272-3026. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Payne can be reached at (571)272-3024. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AGUSTIN BELLO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 08, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 08, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596229
3D TAPERED NANOPHOTONIC WAVEGUIDE TO FIBER EDGE COUPLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580673
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING OPTICAL SUBCARRIERS HAVING DIFFERENT SPECTRAL WIDTHS AND/OR POWER VALUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580657
OUT-OF-BAND COMMUNICATION CHANNEL FOR SUBCARRIER-BASED OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571974
ADAPTER, CONNECTOR, AND OPTO-ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574110
MODULAR CELL SITE INSTALLATION, TESTING, MEASUREMENT, AND MAINTENANCE TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 901 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month